verification-before-completion

Verification Before Completion

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "verification-before-completion" with this command: npx skills add 5dlabs/cto/5dlabs-cto-verification-before-completion

Verification Before Completion

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

When to Use

ALWAYS before:

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims

  • ANY expression of satisfaction about work state

  • Committing, PR creation, task completion

  • Moving to next task

  • Delegating to other agents

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this response, you cannot claim it passes.

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

  1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
  2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
  3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
  4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
    • If NO: State actual status with evidence
    • If YES: State claim WITH evidence
  5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Verification Requirements

Claim Requires Not Sufficient

Tests pass Test command output: 0 failures Previous run, "should pass"

Linter clean Linter output: 0 errors Partial check, extrapolation

Build succeeds Build command: exit 0 Linter passing, logs look good

Bug fixed Test original symptom: passes Code changed, assumed fixed

Regression test works Red-green cycle verified Test passes once

Agent completed VCS diff shows changes Agent reports "success"

Requirements met Line-by-line checklist Tests passing

Clippy passes cargo clippy with 0 warnings cargo build succeeds

Format correct cargo fmt --check exit 0 Code looks right

Red Flags - STOP

  • Using "should", "probably", "seems to"

  • Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!")

  • About to commit/push/PR without verification

  • Trusting agent success reports without checking

  • Relying on partial verification

  • Thinking "just this once"

  • ANY wording implying success without having run verification

Rationalization Prevention

Excuse Reality

"Should work now" RUN the verification

"I'm confident" Confidence ≠ evidence

"Just this once" No exceptions

"Linter passed" Linter ≠ compiler ≠ tests

"Agent said success" Verify independently

"Partial check is enough" Partial proves nothing

"Different words so rule doesn't apply" Spirit over letter

Key Patterns

Tests

✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass" ❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"

Build (Rust)

✅ cargo build --release && echo "Build passes: exit 0" ❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)

Clippy Pedantic

✅ cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings -W clippy::pedantic [See: 0 warnings] "Clippy pedantic clean" ❌ "Fixed the warning" (without re-running)

Requirements

✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion ❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"

Agent Delegation

✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state ❌ Trust agent report

CTO Platform Verification Checklist

Before marking any task complete:

Code Quality

  • cargo fmt --all --check

  • exit 0

  • cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings -W clippy::pedantic

  • 0 warnings

  • cargo test

  • all pass

Pre-Commit

  • pre-commit run --all-files
  • all hooks pass

GitOps (if applicable)

  • make -C infra/gitops validate
  • passes

Why This Matters

From failure analysis:

  • Trust broken when claims don't match reality

  • Undefined functions shipped would crash production

  • Missing requirements shipped = incomplete features

  • Time wasted: false completion → redirect → rework

The Bottom Line

No shortcuts for verification.

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

This is non-negotiable.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

expo-patterns

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

better-auth-expo

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

elysia-llm-docs

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

frontend-excellence

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review