competitor-teardown

Structured competitive analysis with feature matrices, SWOT, positioning maps, and UX review. Covers research frameworks, pricing comparison, review mining, and visual deliverables. Use for: market research, competitive intelligence, investor decks, product strategy, sales enablement. Triggers: competitor analysis, competitive analysis, competitor teardown, market research, competitive intelligence, swot analysis, competitor comparison, market landscape, competitor review, competitive landscape, feature comparison, market positioning

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "competitor-teardown" with this command: npx skills add inference-sh/skills@web-search

Competitor Teardown

Structured competitive analysis with research and screenshots via inference.sh CLI.

Quick Start

curl -fsSL https://cli.inference.sh | sh && infsh login

# Research competitor landscape
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "top project management tools comparison 2024 market share"
}'

# Screenshot competitor's website
infsh app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
  "url": "https://competitor.com",
  "action": "screenshot"
}'

Teardown Framework

The 7-Layer Analysis

LayerWhat to AnalyzeData Source
1. ProductFeatures, UX, qualityScreenshots, free trial
2. PricingPlans, pricing model, hidden costsPricing page, sales call
3. PositioningMessaging, tagline, ICPWebsite, ads
4. TractionUsers, revenue, growthWeb search, press, funding
5. ReviewsStrengths, weaknesses from usersG2, Capterra, App Store
6. ContentBlog, social, SEO strategyWebsite, social profiles
7. TeamSize, key hires, backgroundLinkedIn, About page

Research Commands

Company Overview

# General intelligence
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX company overview funding team size 2024"
}'

# Funding and financials
infsh app run exa/search --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX funding round series valuation investors"
}'

# Recent news
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX latest news announcements 2024"
}'

Product Analysis

# Feature comparison
infsh app run exa/search --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX vs alternatives feature comparison review"
}'

# Pricing details
infsh app run tavily/extract --input '{
  "urls": ["https://competitor.com/pricing"]
}'

# User reviews
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX reviews G2 Capterra pros cons 2024"
}'

UX Screenshots

# Homepage
infsh app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
  "url": "https://competitor.com",
  "action": "screenshot"
}'

# Pricing page
infsh app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
  "url": "https://competitor.com/pricing",
  "action": "screenshot"
}'

# Signup flow
infsh app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
  "url": "https://competitor.com/signup",
  "action": "screenshot"
}'

Feature Matrix

Structure

| Feature | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Real-time collaboration | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| API access | ✅ | Paid only | ✅ | ❌ |
| SSO/SAML | ✅ | Enterprise | ✅ | Enterprise |
| Custom reports | ✅ | Limited | ✅ | ❌ |
| Mobile app | ✅ | iOS only | ✅ | ✅ |
| Free tier | ✅ (unlimited) | ✅ (3 users) | ❌ | ✅ (1 project) |
| Integrations | 50+ | 100+ | 30+ | 20+ |

Rules

  • ✅ = Full support
  • ⚠️ or "Partial" = Limited or conditional
  • ❌ = Not available
  • Note conditions: "Paid only", "Enterprise tier", "Beta"
  • Lead with features where YOU win
  • Be honest about competitor strengths — credibility matters

Pricing Comparison

Structure

| | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|---------|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| **Free tier** | Yes, 5 users | Yes, 3 users | No |
| **Starter** | $10/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $12/user/mo |
| **Pro** | $25/user/mo | $30/user/mo | $29/user/mo |
| **Enterprise** | Custom | Custom | $50/user/mo |
| **Billing** | Monthly/Annual | Annual only | Monthly/Annual |
| **Annual discount** | 20% | 15% | 25% |
| **Min seats** | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| **Hidden costs** | None | Setup fee $500 | API calls metered |

What to Look For

  • Minimum seat requirements
  • Annual-only billing (reduces flexibility)
  • Feature gating between tiers
  • Overage charges
  • Setup/onboarding fees
  • Contract lock-in periods

SWOT Analysis

Create a SWOT for each competitor:

### Competitor A — SWOT

| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|-----------|------------|
| • Strong brand recognition | • Slow feature development |
| • Large integration ecosystem | • Complex onboarding (30+ min) |
| • Enterprise sales team | • No free tier |

| Opportunities | Threats |
|--------------|---------|
| • AI features not yet shipped | • New AI-native competitors |
| • Expanding into mid-market | • Customer complaints about pricing |
| • International markets untapped | • Key engineer departures (LinkedIn) |

Positioning Map

A 2x2 matrix showing where competitors sit on two meaningful dimensions.

Choose Meaningful Axes

Good AxesBad Axes
Simple ↔ ComplexGood ↔ Bad
SMB ↔ EnterpriseCheap ↔ Expensive (too obvious)
Self-serve ↔ Sales-ledOld ↔ New
Specialized ↔ GeneralSmall ↔ Large
Opinionated ↔ Flexible

Template

                    Enterprise
                        │
           Competitor C │  Competitor A
                ●       │       ●
                        │
  Simple ──────────────────────────── Complex
                        │
            You ●       │  Competitor B
                        │       ●
                        │
                      SMB

Generating the Visual

# Create positioning map with Python
infsh app run infsh/python-executor --input '{
  "code": "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\nimport matplotlib\nmatplotlib.use(\"Agg\")\n\nfig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 10))\n\n# Competitors\ncompetitors = {\n    \"You\": (-0.3, -0.3),\n    \"Competitor A\": (0.5, 0.6),\n    \"Competitor B\": (0.6, -0.4),\n    \"Competitor C\": (-0.4, 0.5)\n}\n\nfor name, (x, y) in competitors.items():\n    color = \"#22c55e\" if name == \"You\" else \"#6366f1\"\n    size = 200 if name == \"You\" else 150\n    ax.scatter(x, y, s=size, c=color, zorder=5)\n    ax.annotate(name, (x, y), textcoords=\"offset points\", xytext=(10, 10), fontsize=12, fontweight=\"bold\")\n\nax.axhline(y=0, color=\"grey\", linewidth=0.5)\nax.axvline(x=0, color=\"grey\", linewidth=0.5)\nax.set_xlim(-1, 1)\nax.set_ylim(-1, 1)\nax.set_xlabel(\"Simple ← → Complex\", fontsize=14)\nax.set_ylabel(\"SMB ← → Enterprise\", fontsize=14)\nax.set_title(\"Competitive Positioning Map\", fontsize=16, fontweight=\"bold\")\nax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)\nplt.tight_layout()\nplt.savefig(\"positioning-map.png\", dpi=150)\nprint(\"Saved\")"
}'

Review Mining

Where to Find Reviews

PlatformBest ForURL Pattern
G2B2B SaaSg2.com/products/[product]/reviews
CapterraBusiness softwarecapterra.com/software/[id]/reviews
App StoreiOS appsapps.apple.com
Google PlayAndroid appsplay.google.com
Product HuntLaunchesproducthunt.com/posts/[product]
RedditHonest opinionsreddit.com/r/[relevant-sub]

What to Extract

CategoryLook For
Most praisedWhat features do happy users mention most?
Most complainedWhat do unhappy users say? (= your opportunity)
Switching reasonsWhy do users leave? What triggers switching?
Feature requestsWhat's missing that users want?
Comparison mentionsWhen users compare, what do they say?
# Mine G2 reviews
infsh app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX G2 reviews complaints issues 2024"
}'

# Reddit sentiment
infsh app run exa/search --input '{
  "query": "reddit CompetitorX alternative frustration switching"
}'

Deliverable Formats

Executive Summary (1 page)

## Competitive Landscape Summary

**Market:** [Category] — $[X]B market growing [Y]% annually

**Key competitors:** A (leader), B (challenger), C (niche)

**Our positioning:** [Where you sit and why it matters]

**Key insight:** [One sentence about the biggest opportunity]

| Metric | You | A | B | C |
|--------|-----|---|---|---|
| Users | X | Y | Z | W |
| Pricing (starter) | $X | $Y | $Z | $W |
| Rating (G2) | X.X | Y.Y | Z.Z | W.W |

Detailed Report (per competitor)

  1. Company overview (size, funding, team)
  2. Product analysis (features, UX screenshots)
  3. Pricing breakdown
  4. SWOT analysis
  5. Review analysis (top praised, top complained)
  6. Positioning vs. you
  7. Opportunity summary

Comparison Grid Visual

# Stitch competitor screenshots into comparison
infsh app run infsh/stitch-images --input '{
  "images": ["your-homepage.png", "competitorA-homepage.png", "competitorB-homepage.png"],
  "direction": "horizontal"
}'

Common Mistakes

MistakeProblemFix
Only looking at featuresMisses positioning, pricing, tractionUse the 7-layer framework
Biased analysisLoses credibilityBe honest about competitor strengths
Outdated dataWrong conclusionsDate all research, refresh quarterly
Too many competitorsAnalysis paralysisFocus on top 3-5 direct competitors
No "so what"Data without insightEnd each section with implications for you
Feature-only comparisonDoesn't show positioningInclude pricing, reviews, positioning map

Related Skills

npx skills add inference-sh/skills@web-search
npx skills add inference-sh/skills@prompt-engineering

Browse all apps: infsh app list

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

multi-search-engine

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

feishu-automation

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

web-scraping-automation

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

memory-hygiene

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review