nostr-zap-integration

Implement Lightning Zaps (NIP-57) and Nutzaps (NIP-61) for Nostr applications. Use when building zap request construction (kind:9734), zap receipt validation (kind:9735), LNURL-pay flows, zap splits, Cashu/Nutzap sending (kind:9321), nutzap receiving configuration (kind:10019), or any payment integration between Nostr and Lightning/Cashu.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "nostr-zap-integration" with this command: npx skills add accolver/skill-maker/accolver-skill-maker-nostr-zap-integration

Nostr Zap Integration

Overview

Build correct Lightning Zap and Nutzap flows for Nostr applications. This skill covers the full NIP-57 lifecycle (LNURL discovery, zap request construction, invoice handling, zap receipt validation) and the NIP-61 Cashu alternative (nutzap configuration, P2PK token minting, nutzap publishing and redemption).

When to Use

  • Implementing "zap" functionality in a Nostr client
  • Constructing kind:9734 zap request events
  • Validating kind:9735 zap receipt events
  • Integrating LNURL-pay endpoints with Nostr
  • Building zap split support for events with multiple zap tags
  • Implementing NIP-61 Nutzaps (Cashu-based zaps)
  • Setting up kind:10019 nutzap receiving configuration
  • Constructing kind:9321 nutzap events with P2PK-locked tokens
  • Debugging zap flows (missing tags, validation failures, amount mismatches)

Do NOT use when:

  • Building general Lightning/LNURL wallets unrelated to Nostr
  • Implementing relay WebSocket protocol logic
  • Working with NIP-19 bech32 encoding (separate concern)
  • Building Cashu wallets without Nostr integration

Workflow

1. Determine the Payment Path

Ask: "Is this a Lightning Zap (NIP-57) or a Nutzap (NIP-61)?"

PathWhen to UseKey Kinds
Lightning ZapRecipient has lud16/lud06, LNURL server9734, 9735
Nutzap (Cashu)Recipient has kind:10019, trusted mints10019, 9321

If unsure, check the recipient's profile (kind:0) for lud16/lud06 fields (Lightning path) or query for their kind:10019 event (Nutzap path).

2. Lightning Zap Flow (NIP-57)

Follow the steps in references/zap-flow.md for the complete implementation. Summary:

Step 2a: Discover the LNURL Endpoint

// From lud16 (e.g., "bob@example.com")
const [name, domain] = lud16.split("@");
const url = `https://${domain}/.well-known/lnurlp/${name}`;
const res = await fetch(url);
const lnurlPayData = await res.json();

// Verify Nostr support
if (!lnurlPayData.allowsNostr || !lnurlPayData.nostrPubkey) {
  throw new Error("Recipient does not support Nostr zaps");
}

Critical checks on the LNURL response:

  • allowsNostr MUST be true
  • nostrPubkey MUST be a valid 32-byte hex public key
  • Save callback, minSendable, maxSendable for later use

Step 2b: Construct the Zap Request (kind:9734)

{
  "kind": 9734,
  "content": "Optional zap comment",
  "tags": [
    ["relays", "wss://relay1.example.com", "wss://relay2.example.com"],
    ["amount", "21000"],
    ["lnurl", "lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7..."],
    ["p", "<recipient-pubkey-hex>"],
    ["e", "<event-id-hex>"],
    ["k", "<event-kind-string>"]
  ]
}

Required tags: relays (list of relay URLs), p (recipient pubkey). Recommended tags: amount (millisats as string), lnurl (bech32-encoded). Optional tags: e (event being zapped), a (addressable event coordinate), k (kind of zapped event as string).

Critical: The zap request is NOT published to relays. It is sent to the LNURL callback URL.

Step 2c: Send to Callback and Get Invoice

const zapRequestEncoded = encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(signedZapRequest));
const url =
  `${callback}?amount=${amountMsats}&nostr=${zapRequestEncoded}&lnurl=${lnurlBech32}`;
const { pr: invoice } = await fetch(url).then((r) => r.json());

Step 2d: Pay the Invoice

Pass the bolt11 invoice to a Lightning wallet for payment. After payment, the recipient's LNURL server creates and publishes the zap receipt (kind:9735).

Step 2e: Validate Zap Receipts

See references/zap-flow.md for full validation logic. The three critical checks:

  1. Receipt pubkey MUST match the recipient's LNURL nostrPubkey
  2. Invoice amount in bolt11 tag MUST match amount in the zap request
  3. SHA256(description) SHOULD match the bolt11 description hash

3. Nutzap Flow (NIP-61)

Follow the steps in references/nutzap-flow.md for the complete implementation. Summary:

Step 3a: Fetch Recipient's Nutzap Configuration (kind:10019)

{
  "kind": 10019,
  "tags": [
    ["relay", "wss://relay1.example.com"],
    ["relay", "wss://relay2.example.com"],
    ["mint", "https://mint.example.com", "sat"],
    ["mint", "https://othermint.example.com", "usd", "sat"],
    ["pubkey", "<p2pk-pubkey-hex>"]
  ]
}

Critical: The pubkey tag value MUST NOT be the user's main Nostr pubkey. It is a separate key used exclusively for P2PK locking.

Step 3b: Mint P2PK-Locked Tokens

  1. Choose a mint from the recipient's mint tags
  2. Mint or swap tokens P2PK-locked to the recipient's pubkey value
  3. Prefix the pubkey with "02" for nostr-cashu compatibility
  4. Include DLEQ proofs (NUT-12)

Step 3c: Publish the Nutzap (kind:9321)

{
  "kind": 9321,
  "content": "Optional comment",
  "tags": [
    ["proof", "<cashu-proof-json>"],
    ["unit", "sat"],
    ["u", "https://mint.example.com"],
    ["e", "<zapped-event-id>", "<relay-hint>"],
    ["k", "<zapped-event-kind>"],
    ["p", "<recipient-nostr-pubkey>"]
  ]
}

Publish to the relays listed in the recipient's kind:10019 relay tags.

Step 3d: Receiving Nutzaps

Recipients query for kind:9321 events p-tagging them, filtered by trusted mint URLs (#u). Upon receiving, swap the tokens into their wallet and publish a kind:7376 redemption event.

4. Zap Splits

When an event has zap tags, distribute the zap across recipients:

["zap", "<pubkey>", "<relay>", "<weight>"]

Weights are relative. Calculate percentages:

const totalWeight = zapTags.reduce((sum, t) => sum + Number(t[3] || 0), 0);
for (const tag of zapTags) {
  const weight = Number(tag[3] || 0);
  const pct = weight / totalWeight;
  const recipientAmount = Math.floor(totalAmount * pct);
  // Create separate zap request for each recipient
}

Recipients without a weight value get weight 0 (no zap). If no weights are present on any tag, divide equally.

Checklist

  • Identified payment path (Lightning vs Nutzap)
  • For Lightning: LNURL endpoint discovered and verified (allowsNostr, nostrPubkey)
  • For Lightning: Zap request (kind:9734) has required tags (relays, p)
  • For Lightning: Zap request sent to callback URL, NOT published to relays
  • For Lightning: Amount in millisats, within minSendable/maxSendable
  • For Lightning: Zap receipt validation checks all three criteria
  • For Nutzap: Recipient's kind:10019 fetched and parsed
  • For Nutzap: Tokens minted at one of recipient's listed mints
  • For Nutzap: P2PK pubkey prefixed with "02" and is NOT the main Nostr key
  • For Nutzap: kind:9321 published to recipient's specified relays
  • For splits: Weights calculated correctly, separate zap per recipient

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy It BreaksFix
Publishing kind:9734 to relaysZap requests are sent to LNURL callback, never publishedSend via HTTP GET to callback URL
Amount in satoshis instead of millisatsNIP-57 uses millisats (1 sat = 1000 msats)Multiply sats by 1000 for the amount tag
Using recipient's Nostr pubkey for P2PKNIP-61 requires a SEPARATE key for P2PK lockingUse the pubkey from kind:10019, never the main key
Missing relays tag on zap requestLNURL server won't know where to publish the receiptAlways include at least one relay in relays tag
Not validating receipt pubkeyFake zap receipts from wrong keys acceptedReceipt pubkey MUST match LNURL nostrPubkey
Sending nutzap to unlisted mintRecipient may never see it; tokens could be lostOnly use mints from recipient's kind:10019 mint tags
Missing "02" prefix on P2PK pubkeyCashu P2PK expects compressed pubkey formatAlways prefix with "02" for nostr-cashu compat
Not checking allowsNostr on LNURLServer may not support Nostr zaps at allVerify allowsNostr: true before constructing zap
Treating zap receipt as proof of paymentReceipts can be forged by rogue LNURL serversTrust the receipt author, not the receipt itself

Quick Reference

OperationKindKey TagsPublished?
Zap request9734relays, p, amount, lnurl, eNO (HTTP only)
Zap receipt9735p, P, bolt11, description, eYES (by LNURL server)
Nutzap config10019relay, mint, pubkeyYES (replaceable)
Nutzap send9321proof, u, unit, p, eYES
Nutzap redeem7376e (9321 ref), p (sender)YES (encrypted)

Key Principles

  1. Zap requests are HTTP-only — Kind:9734 events are NEVER published to relays. They are signed, JSON-encoded, URI-encoded, and sent as a query parameter to the LNURL callback URL. This is the most common mistake.

  2. Validate the full chain — A valid zap receipt requires matching the receipt pubkey to the LNURL nostrPubkey, matching the invoice amount to the request amount, and verifying the description hash. Skipping any check allows forged zaps.

  3. Nutzap keys are separate — The P2PK pubkey in kind:10019 MUST be a different key from the user's main Nostr identity key. Using the same key would allow anyone to spend received tokens. Always prefix with "02".

  4. Amounts are in millisatoshis — NIP-57 uses millisats everywhere (1 sat = 1000 msats). The amount tag, minSendable, maxSendable, and invoice amounts are all in millisats.

  5. Trust boundaries matter — Zap receipts are NOT cryptographic proofs of payment. They prove that a LNURL server claims payment was received. The trust is in the LNURL server operator, not in the protocol itself.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

skill-maker

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

pdf-toolkit

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

pr-description

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

monitoring-setup

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review