ac-qa-reviewer

Quality assurance review for implementations. Use when reviewing code quality, checking implementation standards, performing QA cycles, or validating feature quality.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "ac-qa-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add adaptationio/skrillz/adaptationio-skrillz-ac-qa-reviewer

AC QA Reviewer

Perform quality assurance reviews on feature implementations.

Purpose

Reviews completed features for code quality, adherence to standards, security issues, and best practices before marking features as complete.

Quick Start

from scripts.qa_reviewer import QAReviewer

reviewer = QAReviewer(project_dir)
result = await reviewer.review_feature("auth-001")

Review Dimensions

Code Quality

  • Clean code principles
  • DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
  • SOLID principles
  • Code complexity metrics

Security

  • Input validation
  • SQL injection prevention
  • XSS prevention
  • Secure authentication

Performance

  • Algorithm efficiency
  • Database query optimization
  • Memory usage
  • Caching opportunities

Testing

  • Test coverage
  • Test quality
  • Edge case coverage
  • Integration tests

Documentation

  • Code comments
  • API documentation
  • README updates
  • Type annotations

Review Result

{
  "feature_id": "auth-001",
  "approved": true,
  "score": 85,
  "dimensions": {
    "code_quality": {"score": 90, "issues": []},
    "security": {"score": 85, "issues": ["Consider rate limiting"]},
    "performance": {"score": 80, "issues": []},
    "testing": {"score": 88, "issues": []},
    "documentation": {"score": 82, "issues": ["Add docstring to validate_token"]}
  },
  "blocking_issues": [],
  "suggestions": [
    "Consider extracting authentication middleware",
    "Add rate limiting for login endpoint"
  ],
  "auto_fixable": ["missing_docstring"]
}

QA Workflow

1. SCAN    → Static analysis of changed files
2. ANALYZE → Check against quality rules
3. SECURITY → Security-specific checks
4. REVIEW  → Contextual code review
5. REPORT  → Generate review report
6. FIX     → Auto-fix simple issues (optional)
7. APPROVE → Mark as QA passed or request changes

Quality Gates

gates:
  minimum_score: 70
  blocking_categories:
    - security_critical
    - test_failures
  required_checks:
    - linting_passes
    - type_checks_pass
    - tests_pass
    - coverage_minimum

Auto-Fix Capabilities

The reviewer can automatically fix:

  • Missing type hints
  • Formatting issues
  • Simple code style violations
  • Missing docstrings (basic)

Integration

  • Input: Completed features from ac-task-executor
  • Uses: ac-code-validator for static analysis
  • Reports to: ac-state-tracker

API Reference

See scripts/qa_reviewer.py for full implementation.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

supabase-cli

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

codex-cli

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

task-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review