/design-critique
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Get structured design feedback across multiple dimensions.
Usage
/design-critique $ARGUMENTS
Review the design: @$1
If a Figma URL is provided, pull the design from Figma. If a file is referenced, read it. Otherwise, ask the user to describe or share their design.
What I Need From You
-
The design: Figma URL, screenshot, or detailed description
-
Context: What is this? Who is it for? What stage (exploration, refinement, final)?
-
Focus (optional): "Focus on mobile" or "Focus on the onboarding flow"
Critique Framework
- First Impression (2 seconds)
-
What draws the eye first? Is that correct?
-
What's the emotional reaction?
-
Is the purpose immediately clear?
- Usability
-
Can the user accomplish their goal?
-
Is the navigation intuitive?
-
Are interactive elements obvious?
-
Are there unnecessary steps?
- Visual Hierarchy
-
Is there a clear reading order?
-
Are the right elements emphasized?
-
Is whitespace used effectively?
-
Is typography creating the right hierarchy?
- Consistency
-
Does it follow the design system?
-
Are spacing, colors, and typography consistent?
-
Do similar elements behave similarly?
- Accessibility
-
Color contrast ratios
-
Touch target sizes
-
Text readability
-
Alternative text for images
How to Give Feedback
-
Be specific: "The CTA competes with the navigation" not "the layout is confusing"
-
Explain why: Connect feedback to design principles or user needs
-
Suggest alternatives: Don't just identify problems, propose solutions
-
Acknowledge what works: Good feedback includes positive observations
-
Match the stage: Early exploration gets different feedback than final polish
Output
Design Critique: [Design Name]
Overall Impression
[1-2 sentence first reaction — what works, what's the biggest opportunity]
Usability
| Finding | Severity | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| [Issue] | 🔴 Critical / 🟡 Moderate / 🟢 Minor | [Fix] |
Visual Hierarchy
- What draws the eye first: [Element] — [Is this correct?]
- Reading flow: [How does the eye move through the layout?]
- Emphasis: [Are the right things emphasized?]
Consistency
| Element | Issue | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| [Typography/spacing/color] | [Inconsistency] | [Fix] |
Accessibility
- Color contrast: [Pass/fail for key text]
- Touch targets: [Adequate size?]
- Text readability: [Font size, line height]
What Works Well
- [Positive observation 1]
- [Positive observation 2]
Priority Recommendations
- [Most impactful change] — [Why and how]
- [Second priority] — [Why and how]
- [Third priority] — [Why and how]
If Connectors Available
If ~~design tool is connected:
-
Pull the design directly from Figma and inspect components, tokens, and layers
-
Compare against the existing design system for consistency
If ~~user feedback is connected:
- Cross-reference design decisions with recent user feedback and support tickets
Tips
-
Share the context — "This is a checkout flow for a B2B SaaS" helps me give relevant feedback.
-
Specify your stage — Early exploration gets different feedback than final polish.
-
Ask me to focus — "Just look at the navigation" gives you more depth on one area.