reclaude

Refactor CLAUDE.md files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Use when CLAUDE.md is too long or disorganized.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "reclaude" with this command: npx skills add artivilla/agents-config/artivilla-agents-config-reclaude

reclaude

Refactor CLAUDE.md files to follow progressive disclosure principles.

Prompt

I want you to refactor my CLAUDE.md file to follow progressive disclosure principles.

Follow these steps:

1. Check length

Report the current line count. Flag issues:

  • Ideal: <50 lines
  • Acceptable: 50-100 lines
  • Needs refactoring: >100 lines (move content to .claude/rules/ files)

2. Ensure verification section exists

Check for a ## Verification section with commands Claude can run after making changes. If missing:

  • Look in package.json for test/lint/typecheck/build scripts
  • Look for Makefile, justfile, or other task runners
  • Add a ## Verification section with discovered commands

This is critical—Claude performs dramatically better when it can verify its work.

3. Find contradictions

Identify any instructions that conflict with each other. For each contradiction, ask me which version I want to keep.

4. Check for global skill extraction candidates

Look for content that could become a reusable global skill in ~/.claude/skills/:

  • Is about a tool/framework (not project-specific)
  • Same instructions appear (or would apply) in 2+ projects
  • Is substantial (>20 lines)

If found, suggest creating a global skill with name and description.

5. Identify essentials for root CLAUDE.md

Extract only what belongs in the root CLAUDE.md:

  • One-line project description
  • Package manager (if not npm)
  • Non-obvious commands only (skip npm test, npm run build if standard)
  • Links to .claude/rules/ files with brief descriptions
  • Verification section (always required)

6. Group remaining content

Organize remaining instructions into .claude/rules/ files by category (e.g., TypeScript conventions, testing patterns, API design, Git workflow).

7. Flag for deletion

Identify content that should be removed entirely:

  • API documentation — link to external docs instead
  • Code examples — Claude can infer from reading source files
  • Interface/type definitions — these exist in the code
  • Generic advice — "write clean code", "follow best practices"
  • Obvious instructions — "use TypeScript for .ts files"
  • Redundant info — things Claude already knows
  • Too vague — instructions that aren't actionable

Target Template

# Project Name

One-line description.

## Commands
- `command` - what it does (only non-obvious ones)

## Rules
- [Topic](/.claude/rules/topic.md) — brief description

## Verification
After making changes:
- `npm test` - Run tests
- `npm run lint` - Check linting

What to Keep vs Remove

Keep in CLAUDE.md:

  • Commands Claude can't guess from package.json
  • Non-standard patterns specific to this project
  • Project gotchas and footguns
  • Links to detailed rules files

Move to .claude/rules/:

  • Detailed conventions (>10 lines on a topic)
  • Style guides
  • Architecture decisions
  • Workflow documentation

Remove entirely:

  • Anything Claude can infer from reading the codebase
  • Standard practices for the language/framework
  • Documentation that exists elsewhere (link instead)

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

rams

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

interfaces-raunofreiberg

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

technical-writing-styleguide

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

tailwind-v4

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review