code-refactoring-small

Code Refactoring: Keep Code Small

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "code-refactoring-small" with this command: npx skills add aspiers/ai-config/aspiers-ai-config-code-refactoring-small

Code Refactoring: Keep Code Small

Refactor overly large code you just added or extended into smaller, more focused components.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Functions or methods are too long (typically >50 lines)

  • Classes have too many responsibilities

  • Files have grown too large or handle multiple concerns

  • Code has deeply nested blocks

  • After implementing a feature and noticing bloat

Critical Rule: Refactor As You Go

When adding new logic to an existing function, ALWAYS check whether the function is already long. If it is, extract a new method/function for the new logic rather than inlining it. Do NOT bloat existing functions further — refactoring is not a separate step to do later; it must happen at the time of writing.

This applies even when the new code is "just" 20-30 lines. Adding 30 lines to a 100-line function makes it a 130-line function that now needs refactoring. The correct approach is to never let it get that far.

Instructions

Step 1: Identify the Bloat

Review your recent changes (committed or uncommitted) to find:

  • Functions or methods that are too long

  • Classes that have too many responsibilities

  • Files that have grown too large

  • Deeply nested code blocks

  • New logic inlined into already-long functions (this is the most common mistake — catch it early)

Step 2: Clarify Scope (If Needed)

If the bloat is not obvious, ask the user to clarify which specific code units they want refactored before proceeding.

Step 3: Refactor

Once the bloat is identified:

  • Extract logical sub-operations into separate functions/methods

  • Split large classes following Single Responsibility Principle

  • Move related functionality into separate modules/files

  • Reduce nesting levels by extracting guard clauses or helper functions

  • Ensure each unit does one thing well (UNIX Philosophy)

  • Deduplicate repeated structures (e.g. lookup tables defined in multiple places should become shared constants)

Step 4: Verify

After refactoring:

  • Run linters and tests if available

  • Verify the code still works as expected

  • Check that the solution is clearer and more maintainable

  • Ensure the refactoring improved readability

Goal

Break down large, complex code units into smaller, focused components that are:

  • Easier to understand

  • Easier to test

  • Easier to maintain

Each function, class, or file should have a clear, single purpose.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

code-refactoring-dry

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

iterative-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

code-linting

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review