README Update Workflow
When To Use
Use this skill whenever the README requires a structural refresh. Run Skill(sanctum:git-workspace-review) first to capture repo context and diffs.
When NOT To Use
-
Updating inline docs: use doc-updates
-
Consolidating ephemeral reports: use doc-consolidation
Required TodoWrite Items
-
update-readme:language-audit
-
update-readme:exemplar-research
-
update-readme:outline-aligned
-
update-readme:edits-applied
-
update-readme:slop-scanned
-
AI marker detection via scribe
-
update-readme:verification-reporting
Step 1 - Language Audit (update-readme:language-audit )
-
Confirm pwd , git status -sb , and the baseline branch for reference.
-
Detect dominant languages using repository heuristics (manifest files, file counts).
-
Note secondary languages that influence documentation (e.g., a TypeScript frontend and a Rust backend) so the README can surface both.
-
Record the method and findings.
See modules/language-audit.md for detailed detection patterns and commands.
Step 2 - Exemplar Research (update-readme:exemplar-research )
-
For each primary and secondary language, use web search to locate high-quality READMEs (star count, recency, maintainer activity).
-
Capture 2-3 exemplar repositories per language and summarize why each is relevant (section order, visuals, quickstart clarity, governance messaging, math exposition, etc.).
-
Store citations for every exemplar so the final summary references them explicitly.
See modules/exemplar-research.md for search query patterns and evaluation criteria.
Step 3 - Outline Alignment (update-readme:outline-aligned )
-
Compare current README headings (rg -n '^#' README.md ) against patterns observed in exemplars.
-
Draft a target outline covering: value proposition, installation, quickstart, deeper usage/configuration, architecture/feature highlights, performance or math guarantees, documentation links, contribution/governance, roadmap/status, and licensing/security notes.
-
validate internal documents (docs/, specs/, wiki, commands/) are mapped to the relevant sections so the README anchors them with context-sensitive links.
Step 4 - Apply Edits (update-readme:edits-applied )
- Implement the new structure directly in README.md
(or the specified file).
-
Follow Skill(leyline:markdown-formatting) conventions: wrap prose at 80 chars (prefer sentence/clause boundaries), blank lines around headings, ATX headings only, blank line before lists, reference-style links for long URLs.
-
Maintain concise, evidence-based prose; avoid marketing fluff.
-
Add comparison tables, feature lists, or diagrams only if they originate from current repository assets (no speculative content).
-
When referencing algorithms or performance claims, point to benchmarks or tests within the repository or documented math reviews.
Step 4.5 - AI Slop Detection (update-readme:slop-scanned )
Run Skill(scribe:slop-detector) on the updated README to detect AI-generated content markers.
Scribe Integration
The scribe plugin provides AI slop detection:
Skill(scribe:slop-detector) --target README.md
This detects:
-
Tier 1 words: delve, tapestry, comprehensive, leveraging, etc.
-
Phrase patterns: "In today's fast-paced world", "cannot be overstated"
-
Structural markers: Excessive em dashes, bullet overuse, sentence uniformity
-
Marketing language: "enterprise-ready", "cutting-edge", "seamless"
Remediation
If slop score exceeds 2.0 (moderate), apply Skill(scribe:doc-generator) principles:
-
Ground every claim with specifics
-
Remove formulaic openers/closers
-
Use numbers, commands, filenames over adjectives
-
Balance bullets with narrative prose
-
Show authorial perspective (trade-offs, reasoning)
For significant cleanup needs, use:
Agent(scribe:doc-editor) --target README.md
Step 5 - Verification & Reporting (update-readme:verification-reporting )
-
Re-read the updated README for clarity, accessibility (section lengths, bullet balance), and accurate links.
-
Run git diff README.md (or the edited file) and capture snippets for the final report.
-
Summarize detected languages, exemplar sources (with citations), key structural decisions, and follow-up TODOs (e.g., add badges, upload diagrams).
Exit Criteria
-
All TodoWrite items are complete.
-
The README reflects a modern, language-aware structure, referencing both internal docs and external inspiration with citations.
-
Research notes and command references are captured so future reviewers can reproduce the process.
Troubleshooting
Common Issues
Documentation out of sync Run make docs-update to regenerate from code
Build failures Check that all required dependencies are installed
Links broken Verify relative paths in documentation files