posting-bitwarden-review-comments

Posting Bitwarden Review Comments

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "posting-bitwarden-review-comments" with this command: npx skills add bitwarden/ai-plugins/bitwarden-ai-plugins-posting-bitwarden-review-comments

Posting Bitwarden Review Comments

GitHub Comment Posting Protocol

  • MUST Analyze all changes before posting anything

  • MUST Use inline comments for code-specific findings

  • MUST Use the Bitwarden finding format

  • FORBIDDEN: Do NOT add "Strengths", "Highlights", or positive observations sections.

  • FORBIDDEN Do NOT post praise-only inline comments

  • FORBIDDEN: Do NOT post PR metadata issues (title, description, test plan) as inline comments. These go in the summary only.

Finding Format

CRITICAL: Never use # followed by numbers - GitHub will autolink it to unrelated issues/PRs.

  • Writing "#1" creates a clickable link to issue/PR #1 (not your finding)

  • "Issue" is also wrong terminology (use "Finding")

  • Use "Finding" + space + number (no # symbol); aim for under 30 words in sentence

CORRECT FORMAT:

  • Finding 1: Memory leak detected

  • Finding 2: Missing error handling

WRONG (DO NOT USE):

  • ❌ Issue #1 (wrong term + autolink)

  • ❌ #1 (autolink only)

  • ❌ Issue 1 (wrong term only)

Inline Comments

Every inline comment MUST:

  • Reference specific line(s)

  • State the problem - what breaks or what's the risk?

  • Provide actionable fix (for ❌ and ⚠️)

  • Be brief yet clear

  • Use collapsed sections for comments over 5 lines

  • Include both opening <details> AND closing </details> tags

Visibility Rule: Only severity + one-line description visible; everything else inside <details> tags.

Template for long comments

[emoji] [SEVERITY]: [One-line issue description]

<details> <summary>Details and fix</summary>

[Code example or specific fix]

[Rationale explaining why]

Reference: [docs link if applicable] </details>

Summary Output

Invoke Skill(posting-review-summary) for all summary formatting and posting.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

implementing-dapper-queries

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

avoiding-false-positives

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

retrospecting

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

posting-review-summary

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review