skill-authoring-workflow

Turn raw PM content into a compliant, publish-ready skill by choosing build/add paths, running conformance checks, and updating docs before commit.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "skill-authoring-workflow" with this command: npx skills add buyaka/product-manager-skills/buyaka-product-manager-skills-skill-authoring-workflow

Purpose

Create or update PM skills without chaos. This workflow turns rough notes, workshop content, or half-baked prompt dumps into compliant skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md assets that actually pass validation and belong in this repo.

Use it when you want to ship a new skill without "looks good to me" roulette.

Key Concepts

Dogfood First

Use repo-native tools and standards before inventing a custom process:

  • scripts/find-a-skill.sh
  • scripts/add-a-skill.sh
  • scripts/build-a-skill.sh
  • scripts/test-a-skill.sh
  • scripts/check-skill-metadata.py

Pick the Right Creation Path

  • Guided wizard (build-a-skill.sh): Best when you have an idea but not final prose.
  • Content-first generator (add-a-skill.sh): Best when you already have source content.
  • Manual edit + validate: Best for tightening an existing skill.

Definition of Done (No Exceptions)

A skill is done only when:

  1. Frontmatter is valid (name, description, type)
  2. Section order is compliant
  3. Metadata limits are respected (name <= 64 chars, description <= 200 chars)
  4. Cross-references resolve
  5. README catalog counts and tables are updated (if adding/removing skills)

Facilitation Source of Truth

When running this workflow as a guided conversation, use workshop-facilitation as the interaction protocol.

It defines:

  • session heads-up + entry mode (Guided, Context dump, Best guess)
  • one-question turns with plain-language prompts
  • progress labels (for example, Context Qx/8 and Scoring Qx/5)
  • interruption handling and pause/resume behavior
  • numbered recommendations at decision points
  • quick-select numbered response options for regular questions (include Other (specify) when useful)

This file defines the workflow sequence and domain-specific outputs. If there is a conflict, follow this file's workflow logic.

Application

Phase 1: Preflight (Avoid Duplicate Work)

  1. Search for overlapping skills:
./scripts/find-a-skill.sh --keyword "<topic>"
  1. Decide type:
  • Component: one artifact/template
  • Interactive: 3-5 adaptive questions + numbered options
  • Workflow: multi-phase orchestration

Phase 2: Generate Draft

If you have source material:

./scripts/add-a-skill.sh research/your-framework.md

If you want guided prompts:

./scripts/build-a-skill.sh

Phase 3: Tighten the Skill

Manually review for:

  • Clear "when to use" guidance
  • One concrete example
  • One explicit anti-pattern
  • No filler or vague consultant-speak

Phase 4: Validate Hard

Run strict checks before thinking about commit:

./scripts/test-a-skill.sh --skill <skill-name> --smoke
python3 scripts/check-skill-metadata.py skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md

Phase 5: Integrate with Repo Docs

If this is a new skill:

  1. Add it to the correct README category table
  2. Update skill totals and category counts
  3. Verify link paths resolve

Phase 6: Optional Packaging

If targeting Claude custom skill upload:

./scripts/zip-a-skill.sh --skill <skill-name>
# or zip one category:
./scripts/zip-a-skill.sh --type component --output dist/skill-zips
# or use a curated starter preset:
./scripts/zip-a-skill.sh --preset core-pm --output dist/skill-zips

Examples

Example: Turn Workshop Notes into a Skill

Input: research/pricing-workshop-notes.md
Goal: new interactive advisor

./scripts/add-a-skill.sh research/pricing-workshop-notes.md
./scripts/test-a-skill.sh --skill <new-skill-name> --smoke
python3 scripts/check-skill-metadata.py skills/<new-skill-name>/SKILL.md

Expected result:

  • New skill folder exists
  • Skill passes structural and metadata checks
  • README catalog entry added/updated

Anti-Pattern Example

"We wrote a cool skill, skipped validation, forgot README counts, and shipped anyway."

Result:

  • Broken references
  • Inconsistent catalog numbers
  • Confusion for contributors and users

Common Pitfalls

  • Shipping vibes, not standards.
  • Choosing workflow when the task is really a component template.
  • Bloated descriptions that exceed upload limits.
  • Forgetting to update README counts after adding a skill.
  • Treating generated output as final without review.

References

  • README.md
  • AGENTS.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • docs/Building PM Skills.md
  • docs/Add-a-Skill Utility Guide.md
  • scripts/add-a-skill.sh
  • scripts/build-a-skill.sh
  • scripts/find-a-skill.sh
  • scripts/test-a-skill.sh
  • scripts/check-skill-metadata.py
  • scripts/zip-a-skill.sh

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

skill-authoring-workflow

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

skill-authoring-workflow

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

company-research

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

prd-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review