re-verify-logic

Verify logic diagrams against source code. Check line-number accuracy, Mermaid syntax, node completeness, and side effect documentation. Runs as independent Critic in fork context. Use when: verify logic, check logic diagram, validate phase 2, re-verify-logic.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "re-verify-logic" with this command: npx skills add caldiaworks/caldiaworks-marketplace/caldiaworks-caldiaworks-marketplace-re-verify-logic

Logic Verification — Reverse Engineering Phase 2 Critic

Verify logic diagrams produced by re-visualize-logic against actual source code. Runs as an independent Critic in a separate agent context.

Gate rule: Phase 3 (re-extract-requirements) shall not proceed until verification produces a PASS or WARN verdict for all components.

Three Principles (Critic Perspective)

1. Code is Truth

  • The source code is the sole authority. If the logic diagram says something the code does not confirm, the diagram is wrong.

2. Traceability to Line

  • Every line number in the diagram must resolve to actual code. Unresolvable references are hallucinations.

3. Behavior over Intent

  • Verify what the diagram claims against what the code shows. Do not interpret or justify discrepancies.

Execution

Step 1: Load Artifacts

Read docs/reverse/{analysis}/manifest.json.

Determine which components to verify:

  • If component argument is provided, verify only that component
  • If omitted, verify all entries in phase2.completed that have verification: null

For each component, read the logic diagram: docs/reverse/{analysis}/02-logic-{component}.md

Step 2: Line Number Verification

For each node in the Mermaid diagram and each row in the node-to-line mapping table:

  1. Extract the cited line number
  2. Read the source file at that line
  3. Compare the code at that line with the claim

Classify:

  • MATCH: Code at cited line matches the description
  • ⚠️ OFFSET: Code found within ±5 lines
  • MISMATCH: Code at cited line does not match
  • 🚫 HALLUCINATION: Described behavior not found in source at any location

Step 3: Mermaid Syntax Validation

Check each Mermaid code block for:

  • Valid node definitions and arrow syntax
  • No prohibited characters (!=, >=, [], () in text)
  • Parseable structure (matching brackets, valid subgraphs)

Step 4: Completeness Check

Compare the logic diagram against the source method:

  • Count control flow branches in source (if/else, switch cases, loops)
  • Count corresponding nodes in the diagram
  • Flag missing branches

Check side effects documentation:

  • Grep source for database operations, network calls, file I/O, logging
  • Verify each is documented in the side effects summary

Step 5: Generate Verification Report

Write to docs/reverse/{analysis}/verification/v2-logic-{component}.md:

# Logic Diagram Verification: {component}

**Verification Date**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Target Document**: 02-logic-{component}.md
**Verdict**: {PASS / WARN / FAIL}

## Summary

| Check | Result | Details |
|:------|:-------|:--------|
| Line Number Accuracy | {✅/⚠️/❌} | {match}/{total} nodes ({%}) |
| Mermaid Syntax | {✅/⚠️/❌} | {error_count} errors |
| Branch Coverage | {✅/⚠️/❌} | {covered}/{total} branches ({%}) |
| Side Effects | {✅/⚠️/❌} | {documented}/{total} side effects ({%}) |

## Verdict

{PASS/WARN/FAIL}: {explanation}

## Details

### Line Number Issues
| Node | Claimed Line | Actual Line | Issue |
|:-----|:-------------|:------------|:------|

### Missing Branches
- {description of missing branch at file:line}

### Missing Side Effects
- {description of undocumented side effect at file:line}

## Recommendations

1. **[{severity}]** {fix description}

Step 6: Update Manifest

For each verified component:

  • Update phase2.completed[].verification to "verification/v2-logic-{component}.md"

After all components are verified:

  • If all verdicts are PASS or WARN: set phase2.status to "verified"
  • If any verdict is FAIL: leave phase2.status as "completed"
  • Update updated timestamp

Verdict Criteria

CriterionPASSWARNFAIL
Line number accuracy>= 95% match80-94%< 80%
Mermaid syntax errors01-2>= 3
Branch coverage>= 90%75-89%< 75%
Side effect documentation100%>= 80%< 80%
Hallucinations00>= 1

Any single FAIL criterion results in overall FAIL.

Prohibited Actions

  • Do NOT modify logic diagram documents
  • Do NOT modify source code files
  • Do NOT approve documents with FAIL status
  • Do NOT access the Doer's conversation context

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

skill-dev-workflow

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

requirements-docx

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

ideation

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

usdm

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review