memory-manage

Memory Management Skill

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "memory-manage" with this command: npx skills add catlog22/claude-code-workflow/catlog22-claude-code-workflow-memory-manage

Memory Management Skill

Unified entry point for project memory (CLAUDE.md) updates and documentation (API.md/README.md) generation. Routes to specialized sub-commands via arguments or interactive needs assessment.

Architecture Overview

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Memory Manage (Router) │ │ → Parse input → Detect mode → Route to phase │ └───────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ┌───────┴───────┐ ↓ ↓ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ CLAUDE.md │ │ Docs │ │ 管理 │ │ 生成 │ └─────┬─────┘ └─────┬─────┘ │ │ ┌────┼────┐ ┌────┴────┐ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ Full Related Single Full Related 全量 增量 单模块 全量 增量

Execution Flow

Step 1: Parse Input & Route

Detect execution mode from user input:

Auto-Route Rules (priority order):

Signal Route Examples

Explicit sub-command token → Direct dispatch update-full --tool qwen

Keyword: full, 全量, all, entire + update/claude → update-full "全量更新claude"

Keyword: related, changed, 增量, diff + update/claude → update-related "更新变更模块"

Keyword: single, module, 单模块 + path-like token → update-single "更新 src/auth 模块"

Keyword: docs, documentation, 文档 + full/all/全量 → docs-full "全量生成文档"

Keyword: docs, documentation, 文档 + related/changed/增量 → docs-related "增量生成文档"

Ambiguous or no arguments → AskUserQuestion /memory-manage

Valid sub-command tokens: update-full , update-related , update-single , docs-full , docs-related

Direct dispatch examples:

input = "update-full --tool qwen" → subcommand = "update-full", remainingArgs = "--tool qwen" → Read phases/01-update-full.md, execute

input = "update-single src/auth --tool gemini" → subcommand = "update-single", remainingArgs = "src/auth --tool gemini" → Read phases/03-update-single.md, execute

When ambiguous or no arguments, proceed to Step 2.

Step 2: Interactive Needs Assessment

Q1 — 确定内容类别:

AskUserQuestion({ questions: [{ question: "你要管理哪类内容?", header: "类别", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "CLAUDE.md (项目记忆)", description: "更新模块指令文件,帮助Claude理解代码库结构和约定" }, { label: "项目文档 (API+README)", description: "生成API.md和README.md到.workflow/docs/目录" } ] }] })

Q2a — CLAUDE.md 管理范围 (用户选了 CLAUDE.md):

AskUserQuestion({ questions: [{ question: "CLAUDE.md 更新范围?", header: "范围", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "增量更新 (Recommended)", description: "仅更新git变更模块及其父级,日常开发首选" }, { label: "全量更新", description: "更新所有模块,3层架构bottom-up,适合重大重构后" }, { label: "单模块更新", description: "指定一个模块,Explore深度分析后生成说明书式文档" } ] }] })

Route mapping:

  • "增量更新" → update-related → Ref: phases/02-update-related.md

  • "全量更新" → update-full → Ref: phases/01-update-full.md

  • "单模块更新" → update-single → continue to Q3

Q2b — 文档生成范围 (用户选了项目文档):

AskUserQuestion({ questions: [{ question: "文档生成范围?", header: "范围", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "增量生成 (Recommended)", description: "仅为git变更模块生成/更新文档,日常开发首选" }, { label: "全量生成", description: "所有模块+项目级文档(ARCHITECTURE.md等),适合初始化" } ] }] })

Route mapping:

  • "增量生成" → docs-related → Ref: phases/05-docs-related.md

  • "全量生成" → docs-full → Ref: phases/04-docs-full.md

Q3 — 补充路径 (仅 update-single 需要,且无路径参数时):

AskUserQuestion({ questions: [{ question: "请指定要更新的模块路径:", header: "路径", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "src", description: "src 目录" }, { label: ".", description: "项目根目录" } ] }] })

用户可选 "Other" 输入自定义路径。

Step 3: Execute Selected Phase

Based on routing result, read and execute the corresponding phase:

Phase Reference Documents (read on-demand when phase executes):

Mode Document Purpose

update-full phases/01-update-full.md Full CLAUDE.md update, 3-layer architecture, batched agents

update-related phases/02-update-related.md Git-changed CLAUDE.md update, depth-first

update-single phases/03-update-single.md Single module CLAUDE.md, Explore + handbook style

docs-full phases/04-docs-full.md Full API.md + README.md generation

docs-related phases/05-docs-related.md Git-changed docs generation, incremental

Shared Configuration

Tool Fallback Hierarchy

All sub-commands share the same fallback:

--tool gemini → [gemini, qwen, codex] // default --tool qwen → [qwen, gemini, codex] --tool codex → [codex, gemini, qwen]

Common Parameters

Parameter Description Default Used By

--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>

Primary CLI tool gemini All

--path <dir>

Target directory . update-full, docs-full

<path> (positional) Module path (required) update-single

Batching Thresholds

Sub-Command Direct Execution Agent Batch Batch Size

update-full <20 modules ≥20 modules 4/agent

update-related <15 modules ≥15 modules 4/agent

update-single always single N/A 1

docs-full <20 modules ≥20 modules 4/agent

docs-related <15 modules ≥15 modules 4/agent

Core Rules

  • Route before execute: Determine sub-command before any execution

  • Phase doc is truth: All execution logic lives in phase docs, router only dispatches

  • Read on-demand: Only read the selected phase doc, never load all

  • Pass arguments through: Forward remaining args unchanged to sub-command

  • User confirmation: Each sub-command handles its own plan presentation and y/n confirmation

Error Handling

Error Resolution

Unknown sub-command Fall through to interactive flow

Phase doc not found Abort with file path error

Missing path for update-single Prompt via Q3

Sub-command execution fails Follow phase doc's own error handling

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

skill-generator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

review-code

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ccw-help

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

skill-tuning

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review