Plan Gap Analysis

Analyze gaps between documented plans in plans/ and actual implementation.

Workflow

Phase 1: Plan Inventory

Read all plan files:

• 00-overview.md

• Project summary and metrics

• 01-understand.md

• Requirements and components

• 02-plan.md

• Architecture decisions and roadmap

• 03-execute.md

• Implementation details

• 04-review.md

• Quality requirements

• 05-secure.md

• Security requirements

• 06-feedback-loop.md

• Refinements

Phase 2: Codebase Inventory

List all crates

find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "/target/"

List source files

find . -name ".rs" -not -path "/target/*"

Crates to analyze:

• memory-core

• Core data structures and orchestration

• memory-storage-turso

• Turso/libSQL backend

• memory-storage-redb

• redb cache layer

• memory-mcp

• MCP server and sandbox

• test-utils

• Test utilities

• benches

• Performance benchmarks

Phase 3: Gap Identification

Check each phase:

Phase Focus Areas

UNDERSTAND Data structures, type definitions

PLAN Architectural decisions, success metrics

EXECUTE Storage, learning, MCP features

REVIEW FR1-FR7, NFR1-NFR6 tests

SECURE Attack surfaces, mitigations

FEEDBACK Edge cases, optimizations

Phase 4: Prioritization

Critical (Blocks production):

• Security vulnerabilities

• Data corruption risks

• Missing core functionality

High (Affects quality):

• Performance targets not met

• Test coverage below target

• Missing error handling

Medium (Technical debt):

• Code quality issues

• Documentation gaps

Phase 5: TODO Generation

Phase [N]: [NAME]

Critical Priority

• [Component] - [Missing item]
  • File: path/to/file.rs
  • Plan: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
  • Impact: [Description]
  • Effort: [Estimate]

Output Format

Plan Gap Analysis Report

Total Requirements: X Implemented: Y (Z%) Gaps Identified: N

By Phase

• Phase 1: X/Y complete
• Phase 2: X/Y complete
• ...

Critical Gaps

1. [Gap] - Priority, Effort

Best Practices

✓ Be systematic: Check every requirement ✓ Be specific: Reference exact file locations ✓ Be accurate: Verify, don't assume ✓ Be prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low ✓ Be actionable: Include file paths and estimates