shape

Shape: create a filled Shaping doc from an attached Pitch

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "shape" with this command: npx skills add dailydm/skills/dailydm-skills-shape

Shape: create a filled Shaping doc from an attached Pitch

When the user types /shape and attaches a Pitch document, do the following:

1) Study the Pitch and the codebase (required)

  • Read the Pitch end-to-end.
  • Identify the primary user workflow(s) and system boundary.
  • Search the repo for the relevant implementation paths (models, controllers, services, jobs, GraphQL, frontend).
  • Prefer proposing integration points that match existing patterns (feature flags, async jobs, external service clients, metrics).

2) Create a new Shaping markdown file

  • Location: projects/<domain-name>/<project-name>/shaping.md
  • Domain name: the product area or team domain (e.g., payments, family-messaging, attendance-plus)
  • Project name: derive a stable folder slug from the attached pitch path when possible (prefer projects/<domain-name>/<project-name>/pitch.md).
  • First line: # Shaping: <Pitch title>
  • Source link: add a line referencing the attached Pitch doc path.

3) Populate the Shaping doc with inferred content (no blanks)

Fill every section based on the Pitch + codebase study. If something cannot be inferred, write the smallest explicit note stating what's missing and why.

Frame (from Pitch)

  • Problem:
  • Desired outcome:
  • Appetite: infer a recommendation from the Pitch constraints and repo complexity; label it as a recommendation if not explicitly approved.

Solution at the right altitude

  • Approach: describe the smallest end-to-end slice.
  • Integration points: list concrete files/classes/modules likely to change.
  • Boundaries:
  • No-gos:

Lo-fi breadboard

  • Places:
  • Affordances:
  • Connections:

Rabbit holes (de-risk now)

List the top risks and a concrete de-risk plan for each (spikes, data sampling, contracts, perf/latency, failure modes).

Scope

  • Must-dos: minimum shippable set aligned to Appetite.
  • Nice-to-haves: explicitly droppable items to protect the deadline.

Delivery Gate criteria (draft)

Make this testable and operational:

  • Ship criteria:
  • Rollout plan (flags/permissions, pilot scope):
  • Observability (key dashboards/metrics/logs):
  • Fallback behavior:

4) Ask only for confirmation on true decision inputs

After writing the filled doc, ask the user to confirm:

  • Appetite (approved or adjust)
  • Any policy/legal wording that must be exact
  • Pilot rollout constraints (which tenants/roles)

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

shapeup

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

breakdown

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

frame

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

frame-coach

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review