skill-reviewer

Reviews and improves Claude Code skills against official best practices. Supports three modes - self-review (validate your own skills), external review (evaluate others' skills), and auto-PR (fork, improve, submit). Use when checking skill quality, reviewing skill repositories, or contributing improvements to open-source skills.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "skill-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add daymade/claude-code-skills/daymade-claude-code-skills-skill-reviewer

Skill Reviewer

Review and improve Claude Code skills against official best practices.

Setup (Auto-Install Dependencies)

Before using this skill, ensure skill-creator is installed for automated validation.

Auto-install sequence:

# 1. Check if skill-creator exists
SKILL_CREATOR=$(find ~/.claude/plugins/cache -name "skill-creator" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1)

# 2. If not found, install it
if [ -z "$SKILL_CREATOR" ]; then
  claude plugin marketplace add https://github.com/daymade/claude-code-skills
  claude plugin install skill-creator@daymade-skills
  SKILL_CREATOR=$(find ~/.claude/plugins/cache -name "skill-creator" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1)
fi

echo "skill-creator location: $SKILL_CREATOR"

Three Modes

Mode 1: Self-Review

Check your own skill before publishing.

Automated validation (run after setup):

# Quick validation
python3 "$SKILL_CREATOR"/*/quick_validate.py <target-skill>

# Security scan
python3 "$SKILL_CREATOR"/*/security_scan.py <target-skill> --verbose

Manual evaluation: See references/evaluation_checklist.md.

Mode 2: External Review

Evaluate someone else's skill repository.

Review Workflow:
- [ ] Clone repository to /tmp/
- [ ] Read ALL documentation first
- [ ] Identify author's intent
- [ ] Run evaluation checklist
- [ ] Generate improvement report

Mode 3: Auto-PR

Fork, improve, and submit PR to external skill repository.

Auto-PR Workflow:
- [ ] Fork repository (gh repo fork)
- [ ] Create feature branch
- [ ] Apply additive improvements only
- [ ] Self-review: respect check passed?
- [ ] Create PR with detailed explanation

Evaluation Checklist (Quick)

CategoryCheckStatus
Frontmattername present?
description present?
description in third-person?
includes trigger conditions?
Instructionsimperative form?
under 500 lines?
workflow pattern?
Resourcesno hardcoded paths?
scripts have error handling?

Full checklist: references/evaluation_checklist.md

Core Principle: Additive Only

When improving external skills, NEVER:

  • Delete existing files
  • Remove functionality
  • Change primary language
  • Rename components

ALWAYS:

  • Add new capabilities
  • Preserve original content
  • Explain every change
❌ "Removed metadata.json (non-standard)"
✅ "Added marketplace.json (metadata.json preserved)"

❌ "Rewrote README in English"
✅ "Added README.en.md (Chinese preserved as default)"

Common Issues & Fixes

Issue: Description Not Third-Person

# Before
description: Browse YouTube videos and summarize them.

# After
description: Browses YouTube videos and generates summaries. Use when...

Issue: Missing Trigger Conditions

# Before
description: Processes PDF files.

# After
description: Extracts text from PDFs. Use when working with PDF files or when the user mentions PDFs, forms, or document extraction.

Issue: No Workflow Pattern

Add checklist for complex tasks:

## Workflow

Copy this checklist:

\`\`\`
Task Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: ...
- [ ] Step 2: ...
\`\`\`

Issue: Missing Marketplace Support

mkdir -p .claude-plugin
# Create marketplace.json from template

See references/marketplace_template.json.

PR Guidelines

When submitting PRs to external repos:

Tone

❌ "Your skill doesn't follow best practices"
✅ "This PR aligns with best practices for better discoverability"

❌ "Fixed the incorrect description"
✅ "Improved description with trigger conditions"

Required Sections

  1. Summary - What this PR does
  2. What's NOT Changed - Show respect for original
  3. Rationale - Why each change helps
  4. Test Plan - How to verify

Template: references/pr_template.md

Self-Review Checklist

Before submitting any PR:

Respect Check:
- [ ] No files deleted?
- [ ] No functionality removed?
- [ ] Original language preserved?
- [ ] Author's design decisions respected?
- [ ] All changes are additive?
- [ ] PR explains the "why"?

References

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

twitter-reader

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ppt-creator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

prompt-optimizer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

qa-expert

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review