review-council

Run all code review tools in parallel and aggregate results into a comprehensive review report.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "review-council" with this command: npx skills add derogab/agent-kit/derogab-agent-kit-review-council

Context

  • Current branch: !git branch --show-current
  • Base branch: !git rev-parse --verify main >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo main || echo master
  • Arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Your task

Act as a Code Review Orchestrator: discover all available review-capable skills, run them in parallel via read-only sub-agents, and produce a single aggregated report.

Pre-flight checks

  1. Determine the review target:
    • If $ARGUMENTS is a PR number, pass it to each reviewer.
    • If $ARGUMENTS is a file path or set of changes, pass those directly.
    • If $ARGUMENTS is empty, each reviewer should review the current branch compared to the base branch.

Step 1: Discover available review skills

Look at all skills currently available and identify every skill whose name or description indicates it can perform a code review, PR review, or security review. Exclude this skill itself (review-council) to avoid recursion.

Step 2: Launch all reviewers in parallel

For each review-capable skill discovered in Step 1, launch a read-only sub-agent that invokes that skill via the Skill tool with $ARGUMENTS and returns the full review output.

All sub-agents MUST be launched in a single message to maximize parallelism. Sub-agents must not modify files, create commits, or push changes.

Step 3: Collect results and aggregate

Wait for all sub-agents to complete. Produce a single report:

# Full Code Review Report

## Summary
[1-3 sentence overall assessment. Mention the number of reviewers run and issues found.]

## Critical Issues
[Issues flagged as critical/blocking by ANY reviewer. Deduplicate across reviewers, noting which flagged each.]

## Important Issues
[Non-blocking but significant issues. Deduplicate across reviewers.]

## Minor Issues & Suggestions
[Style, naming, minor improvements. Deduplicate across reviewers.]

## Reviewer Verdicts

| Reviewer | Verdict | Key Concerns |
|----------|---------|--------------|
| [skill name] | ... | ... |

## Detailed Reviews

### [Skill Name]
[Full verbatim output from that reviewer's sub-agent]

Rules

  • All sub-agents MUST be launched in parallel in a single message.
  • Sub-agents are read-only — they must not modify files, create commits, or push changes.
  • Do NOT skip any discovered reviewer. If one fails, report the failure in the output.
  • If multiple reviewers flag the same issue (same file, same line, same concern), merge them into one entry and note all reviewers that caught it.
  • If reviewers disagree on severity, use the highest. Severity ranking: Critical > Important > Minor.
  • If 3+ reviewers flag the same issue, mark it with [CONSENSUS].
  • Include the full review output in the Detailed Reviews section, but redact any credentials, secrets, API keys, tokens, or passwords that may appear in the output.
  • Keep Critical Issues short and focused on what MUST be addressed before merging.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

pr

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

commit

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

worktree

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

code-simplifier

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review