When this skill is invoked:
Parse the subcommand from the argument:
-
scan — Scan the codebase for tech debt indicators
-
add — Add a new tech debt entry manually
-
prioritize — Re-prioritize the existing debt register
-
report — Generate a summary report of current debt status
For scan :
-
Search the codebase for debt indicators:
-
TODO comments (count and categorize)
-
FIXME comments (these are bugs disguised as debt)
-
HACK comments (workarounds that need proper solutions)
-
@deprecated markers
-
Duplicated code blocks (similar patterns in multiple files)
-
Files over 500 lines (potential god objects)
-
Functions over 50 lines (potential complexity)
-
Categorize each finding:
-
Architecture Debt: Wrong abstractions, missing patterns, coupling issues
-
Code Quality Debt: Duplication, complexity, naming, missing types
-
Test Debt: Missing tests, flaky tests, untested edge cases
-
Documentation Debt: Missing docs, outdated docs, undocumented APIs
-
Dependency Debt: Outdated packages, deprecated APIs, version conflicts
-
Performance Debt: Known slow paths, unoptimized queries, memory issues
-
Update the debt register at docs/tech-debt-register.md
For add :
-
Prompt for: description, category, affected files, estimated fix effort, impact if left unfixed
-
Append to the debt register
For prioritize :
-
Read the debt register
-
Score each item by: (impact_if_unfixed * frequency_of_encounter) / fix_effort
-
Re-sort the register by priority score
-
Recommend which items to include in the next sprint
For report :
-
Read the debt register
-
Generate summary statistics:
-
Total items by category
-
Total estimated fix effort
-
Items added vs resolved since last report
-
Trending direction (growing / stable / shrinking)
-
Flag any items that have been in the register for more than 3 sprints
-
Output the report
Debt Register Format
Technical Debt Register
Last updated: [Date] Total items: [N] | Estimated total effort: [T-shirt sizes summed]
| ID | Category | Description | Files | Effort | Impact | Priority | Added | Sprint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TD-001 | [Cat] | [Description] | [files] | [S/M/L/XL] | [Low/Med/High/Critical] | [Score] | [Date] | [Sprint to fix or "Backlog"] |
Rules
-
Tech debt is not inherently bad — it is a tool. The register tracks conscious decisions.
-
Every debt entry must explain WHY it was accepted (deadline, prototype, missing info)
-
"Scan" should run at least once per sprint to catch new debt
-
Items older than 3 sprints without action should either be fixed or consciously accepted with a documented reason