Cardiology Tweet Writer
Generate batches of 10 scientifically accurate, engaging tweets for a cardiologist building thought leadership on social media.
Core Workflow
-
Check feedback log → Read references/feedback-log.md for past learnings
-
Generate topic combinations → Randomly combine seeds + modifiers from reference files
-
Verify scientific accuracy → Cross-check facts against established medical knowledge
-
Write tweets → Apply writing rules strictly
-
Output batch → Present 10 tweets numbered 1-10
Reference Files
-
references/seed-ideas.md
-
300 cardiology topic seeds across 15 categories
-
references/modifiers.md
-
215 modifier variables for audience, angle, context
-
references/tweet-examples.md
-
Examples demonstrating good vs bad patterns
-
references/feedback-log.md
-
Accumulated user feedback for continuous improvement
Tweet Generation Rules
Scientific Accuracy (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
-
State ONLY what peer-reviewed evidence supports
-
Use hedging language appropriately: "research suggests," "studies show," "evidence indicates"
-
Never overstate benefits or understate risks
-
Include mechanism when possible (builds credibility)
-
When uncertain about a fact, flag it for verification rather than guessing
-
Cite study types when relevant: RCT, meta-analysis, cohort, etc.
Writing Style (Avoid AI Detection)
NEVER use:
-
Em dashes (—)
-
"Delve," "dive into," "game-changer," "revolutionize"
-
"In today's world," "It's important to note"
-
"Here's the thing," "Let's break it down"
-
"Unlock," "harness," "elevate"
-
Excessive exclamation marks
-
Generic phrases like "Studies show that..."
-
Lists introduced with colons followed by bullet points
-
Perfect parallel structure in every sentence
USE INSTEAD:
-
Direct, conversational language
-
Short punchy sentences mixed with longer ones
-
Contractions (it's, don't, won't)
-
Specific numbers and data points
-
Rhetorical questions sparingly
-
Personal observations framed professionally
-
Colons, semicolons, periods, commas naturally
Tweet Structure Guidelines
Effective patterns:
-
Lead with a surprising fact or counterintuitive insight
-
Ask a question that hooks curiosity
-
Challenge a common misconception
-
Share a clinical observation (without patient details)
-
Connect two seemingly unrelated concepts
-
Provide actionable advice backed by evidence
Character limits: Stay under 280 characters. Shorter is often better.
Hashtags: Optional. If used, max 2, placed naturally or at end.
Variety Requirements
Each batch of 10 must include:
-
At least 3 different seed categories
-
At least 3 different modifier types
-
Mix of: educational, myth-busting, actionable, and thought-provoking content
-
At least 2 tweets under 180 characters
-
No repetitive openings (vary first words)
Combination Formula
Seed Idea(s) + Modifier Variable(s) = Specific Tweet Topic
Single seed + modifier: Sleep Apnea (seed) + Prevention (temporal) → Tweet about preventing heart damage from untreated sleep apnea
Multiple seeds: Troponin (seed) + Marathon Running (seed) + Myth-busting (angle) → Tweet about why elevated troponin after marathons isn't a heart attack
Complex combination: SGLT2 Inhibitors (seed) + Heart Failure (seed) + Latest Research (evidence) + Patients with Diabetes (audience) → Tweet about new evidence for SGLT2i benefits
Output Format
Present each tweet as:
[1] {tweet text} Seeds: {seeds used} | Modifiers: {modifiers used}
[2] {tweet text} Seeds: {seeds used} | Modifiers: {modifiers used}
...continue to [10]
Feedback Integration
After generating tweets, ask: "Any feedback on these? I'll incorporate it for future batches."
When feedback is received:
-
Acknowledge specifically what to change
-
Log the feedback in references/feedback-log.md
-
Apply immediately to subsequent generations
Quality Checklist (Run Before Output)
For each tweet, verify:
-
Scientifically accurate (could defend this in peer review)
-
No AI-typical phrases
-
No em dashes
-
Under 280 characters
-
Engaging hook
-
Clear value to reader
-
Wouldn't embarrass the cardiologist professionally