entity extractor

The Entity Extractor skill guides you through implementing named entity recognition (NER) systems that identify and classify entities in text. From people and organizations to domain-specific entities like products, medical terms, or financial instruments, this skill covers extraction approaches from simple pattern matching to advanced neural models.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "entity extractor" with this command: npx skills add eddiebe147/claude-settings/eddiebe147-claude-settings-entity-extractor

Entity Extractor

The Entity Extractor skill guides you through implementing named entity recognition (NER) systems that identify and classify entities in text. From people and organizations to domain-specific entities like products, medical terms, or financial instruments, this skill covers extraction approaches from simple pattern matching to advanced neural models.

Entity extraction is a foundational NLP task that powers applications from search engines to knowledge graphs. Getting it right requires understanding your domain, choosing appropriate techniques, and handling the inherent ambiguity in natural language.

Whether you need to extract standard entity types, define custom entities for your domain, or build relation extraction on top of entity recognition, this skill ensures your extraction pipeline is accurate and maintainable.

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Choose Extraction Approach

  • Define target entities:

  • Standard types: PERSON, ORG, LOCATION, DATE, MONEY

  • Domain-specific: PRODUCT, SYMPTOM, GENE, CONTRACT

  • Relations: connections between entities

  • Assess available resources:

  • Labeled training data

  • Domain expertise

  • Compute constraints

  • Select approach:

Approach Training Data Accuracy Speed Customization

spaCy (pre-trained) None Good Very fast Limited

Rule-based None Variable Fast High

Fine-tuned BERT 100s-1000s Excellent Medium Full

LLM (zero-shot) None Good Slow Prompt-based

LLM (few-shot) Few examples Very good Slow Prompt-based

  • Plan implementation and evaluation

Workflow 2: Implement Entity Extraction Pipeline

  • Set up extraction: import spacy

class EntityExtractor: def init(self, model="en_core_web_trf"): self.nlp = spacy.load(model)

def extract(self, text):
    doc = self.nlp(text)
    entities = []
    for ent in doc.ents:
        entities.append({
            "text": ent.text,
            "type": ent.label_,
            "start": ent.start_char,
            "end": ent.end_char,
            "confidence": getattr(ent, "confidence", None)
        })
    return entities

def extract_batch(self, texts):
    docs = list(self.nlp.pipe(texts))
    return [self.extract_from_doc(doc) for doc in docs]
  • Post-process entities:

  • Normalize variations (IBM vs I.B.M.)

  • Resolve abbreviations

  • Link to knowledge base

  • Validate extraction quality

  • Handle edge cases

Workflow 3: Build Custom Entity Recognizer

  • Prepare training data:

Format for spaCy training

TRAIN_DATA = [ ("Apple released the new iPhone today.", { "entities": [(0, 5, "ORG"), (24, 30, "PRODUCT")] }), ("Dr. Smith prescribed metformin for diabetes.", { "entities": [(0, 9, "PERSON"), (21, 30, "DRUG"), (35, 43, "CONDITION")] }) ]

  • Configure training:

spaCy config for NER training

config = { "training": { "optimizer": {"learn_rate": 0.001}, "batch_size": {"@schedules": "compounding", "start": 4, "stop": 32} }, "components": { "ner": { "factory": "ner", "model": {"@architectures": "spacy.TransitionBasedParser"} } } }

  • Train model: python -m spacy train config.cfg --output ./models --paths.train ./train.spacy --paths.dev ./dev.spacy

  • Evaluate on held-out data

  • Iterate based on errors

Quick Reference

Action Command/Trigger

Extract entities "Extract entities from [text]"

Choose NER model "Best NER for [domain]"

Custom entities "Train custom entity recognizer"

Evaluate NER "Evaluate entity extraction quality"

Handle ambiguity "Resolve ambiguous entities"

Entity linking "Link entities to knowledge base"

Best Practices

Start with Pre-trained: Don't train from scratch unnecessarily

  • spaCy, Hugging Face, and cloud APIs cover common entities

  • Test pre-trained models first

  • Fine-tune only when needed

Define Clear Guidelines: Entity boundaries are ambiguous

  • "Dr. John Smith" - one entity or two?

  • "New York Times" - ORG or GPE?

  • Create and follow consistent annotation guidelines

Handle Nested Entities: Some entities contain others

  • "Bank of America headquarters" (ORG inside LOCATION)

  • Decide on nesting strategy upfront

  • Some models support flat only; others handle nested

Normalize Extracted Entities: Raw text has variations

  • "IBM", "I.B.M.", "International Business Machines"

  • Canonicalize to standard form

  • Link to knowledge base IDs when possible

Evaluate Granularly: Aggregate metrics hide issues

  • Report precision/recall per entity type

  • Analyze error patterns

  • Test on edge cases explicitly

Consider Context Window: Models have context limits

  • Long documents may need chunking

  • Preserve context across chunks when possible

  • Re-run on boundaries if entities might span

Advanced Techniques

LLM-Based Entity Extraction

Use language models for flexible extraction:

def llm_extract_entities(text, entity_types): prompt = f"""Extract named entities from the following text.

Text: "{text}"

Entity types to extract: {chr(10).join(f"- {t}: {desc}" for t, desc in entity_types.items())}

Return a JSON array of entities: [{{"text": "entity text", "type": "ENTITY_TYPE", "start": 0, "end": 10}}]

Only include entities that clearly match the specified types. """

response = llm.complete(prompt, response_format={"type": "json_object"})
return json.loads(response)["entities"]

Example usage

entity_types = { "COMPANY": "Business organizations", "PRODUCT": "Commercial products or services", "PERSON": "Individual people's names" } entities = llm_extract_entities(text, entity_types)

Hybrid Rule + ML Approach

Combine patterns with neural extraction:

class HybridExtractor: def init(self): self.ml_extractor = spacy.load("en_core_web_trf") self.patterns = load_pattern_rules()

def extract(self, text):
    # ML extraction
    ml_entities = self.ml_extractor(text).ents

    # Pattern-based extraction
    pattern_entities = apply_patterns(text, self.patterns)

    # Merge with priority rules
    merged = merge_entities(
        ml_entities,
        pattern_entities,
        priority="pattern"  # Patterns override ML when overlap
    )

    return merged

def add_pattern(self, pattern, entity_type):
    """Add domain-specific pattern."""
    self.patterns.append({
        "pattern": pattern,
        "type": entity_type
    })

Entity Linking

Connect extracted entities to knowledge bases:

def link_entity(entity_text, entity_type, knowledge_base): """ Link extracted entity to canonical entry in knowledge base. """ # Generate candidates candidates = knowledge_base.search( query=entity_text, type_filter=entity_type, limit=10 )

if not candidates:
    return {"entity": entity_text, "linked": None}

# Score candidates
scored = []
for candidate in candidates:
    score = compute_linking_score(
        entity_text,
        candidate.name,
        candidate.aliases
    )
    scored.append((candidate, score))

# Select best match
best = max(scored, key=lambda x: x[1])

if best[1] > LINKING_THRESHOLD:
    return {
        "entity": entity_text,
        "linked": best[0].id,
        "canonical_name": best[0].name,
        "confidence": best[1]
    }
else:
    return {"entity": entity_text, "linked": None}

Relation Extraction

Extract relationships between entities:

def extract_relations(text, entities): """ Given extracted entities, find relations between them. """ prompt = f"""Given this text and extracted entities, identify relationships.

Text: "{text}"

Entities found: {json.dumps(entities, indent=2)}

Identify relationships between entities. Return JSON: [{{ "subject": "entity text", "relation": "relationship type", "object": "entity text", "confidence": 0.9 }}]

Common relation types: WORKS_FOR, LOCATED_IN, FOUNDED, ACQUIRED, PARTNER_OF """

response = llm.complete(prompt)
return json.loads(response)

Active Learning for NER

Efficiently improve extraction with targeted labeling:

def active_learning_sample(unlabeled_texts, model, n_samples=100): """ Select texts that would be most valuable to label. """ uncertainties = []

for text in unlabeled_texts:
    doc = model(text)
    # Calculate uncertainty (various strategies)
    uncertainty = calculate_ner_uncertainty(doc)
    uncertainties.append((text, uncertainty))

# Select most uncertain
uncertainties.sort(key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
return [text for text, _ in uncertainties[:n_samples]]

def calculate_ner_uncertainty(doc): """ Calculate uncertainty based on entity confidence scores. """ if not doc.ents: return 0.5 # No entities - medium uncertainty

confidences = [ent._.confidence for ent in doc.ents if hasattr(ent._, "confidence")]
if not confidences:
    return 0.5

# High uncertainty = low confidence entities
return 1 - min(confidences)

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Inconsistent annotation guidelines leading to noisy training data

  • Not handling entity boundary ambiguity (where does entity end?)

  • Ignoring nested or overlapping entities when they matter

  • Training on small datasets without augmentation

  • Not normalizing entities before downstream use

  • Assuming pre-trained models work on your domain without testing

  • Not evaluating per-entity-type performance

  • Forgetting about entity linking for disambiguation

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

supabase-expert

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

landing-page-designer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

appstore-readiness

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

docker-composer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review