Drone Inspection Specialist
Expert in drone-based infrastructure inspection with computer vision, thermal analysis, and 3D reconstruction for insurance, property assessment, and environmental monitoring.
Decision Tree: When to Use This Skill
User mentions drones/UAV? ├─ YES → Is it about inspection or assessment of something? │ ├─ Fire detection, smoke, thermal hotspots → THIS SKILL │ ├─ Roof damage, hail, shingles → THIS SKILL │ ├─ Property/insurance assessment → THIS SKILL │ ├─ 3D reconstruction for measurement → THIS SKILL │ ├─ Wildfire risk, defensible space → THIS SKILL │ └─ NO (flight control, navigation, general CV) → drone-cv-expert └─ NO → Is it about fire/roof/property assessment without drones? ├─ YES → Still use THIS SKILL (methods apply) └─ NO → Different skill needed
Core Competencies
Fire Detection & Wildfire Risk
-
Multi-Modal Detection: RGB smoke + thermal hotspot fusion
-
Precondition Assessment: NDVI, fuel load, vegetation density
-
Defensible Space: CAL FIRE/NFPA 1144 compliance evaluation
-
Progression Tracking: Spread rate, direction prediction
Roof & Structural Inspection
-
Damage Detection: Cracks, missing shingles, wear, ponding
-
Hail Analysis: Impact pattern recognition, size estimation
-
Thermal Analysis: Moisture detection, insulation gaps, HVAC leaks
-
Material Classification: Asphalt, metal, tile, slate identification
3D Reconstruction (Gaussian Splatting)
-
Pipeline: Video → COLMAP SfM → 3DGS training → Web viewer
-
Measurements: Roof area, damage dimensions, property bounds
-
Change Detection: Before/after comparison for claims
Insurance & Reinsurance
-
Claim Packaging: Documentation meeting industry standards
-
Risk Modeling: Catastrophe models, loss distributions
-
Precondition Data: Satellite + drone + ground integration
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- "Single-Sensor Dependence"
Wrong: Using only RGB for fire detection. Right: Multi-modal fusion (RGB + thermal) for high-confidence alerts.
Detection Source Confidence Action
Thermal fire only 70% Alert + verify
RGB smoke only 60% Alert + investigate
Thermal + RGB 95% Confirmed fire
- "Ignoring Hail Pattern"
Wrong: Counting damage without analyzing spatial distribution. Right: True hail damage has RANDOM distribution. Linear or clustered patterns indicate other causes (foot traffic, age).
- "Thermal Temperature Trust"
Wrong: Using raw thermal values without calibration. Right: Account for:
-
Emissivity of materials (roof = 0.9-0.95)
-
Atmospheric transmission (humidity, distance)
-
Reflected temperature from surroundings
-
Time of day (thermal lag)
- "3DGS Frame Overload"
Wrong: Extracting every frame from drone video. Right: Extract 2-3 fps with 80% overlap. More frames ≠ better reconstruction.
Video FPS Extract Rate Result
30 30 (all) Redundant, slow processing
30 2-3 Optimal quality/speed
30 0.5 Insufficient overlap
- "Insurance Claim Speculation"
Wrong: Estimating costs without material identification. Right: Identify material → Apply correct cost matrix.
Material Repair $/sqft Replace $/sqft
Asphalt shingle $5-10 $3-7
Metal $10-15 $8-14
Tile $12-20 $10-18
Slate $20-40 $15-30
- "Defensible Space Zone Confusion"
Wrong: Treating all vegetation equally regardless of distance. Right: CAL FIRE zones have different requirements:
Zone Distance Requirement
0 0-5 ft Ember-resistant (no combustibles)
1 5-30 ft Lean, clean, green (spaced trees)
2 30-100 ft Reduced fuel (selective thinning)
Data Collection Strategy
Satellite Data (Regional Context)
-
Sentinel-2: 10m resolution, NDVI, fuel moisture (SWIR bands)
-
Landsat-8: 30m resolution, historical baseline, thermal band
-
Planet: 3m resolution daily, change detection
-
Application: Regional risk mapping, before/after events
Drone Data (Property Detail)
-
RGB Mapping: 2-5cm GSD, orthomosaic, 3D model
-
Thermal Survey: Moisture detection, heat signatures
-
Close Inspection: Damage documentation, detail photos
-
Application: Individual property assessment
Ground Truth
-
Slope Measurement: GPS transects for topographic risk
-
Soil Sampling: Moisture content for fire risk
-
Material Verification: Confirm roof type
-
Application: Calibration and validation
Quick Reference Tables
Fire Detection Confidence Levels
Signal Combination Confidence Alert Priority
Thermal >150°C + Smoke 95% CRITICAL
Thermal fire model 80% HIGH
Hotspot >80°C 70% MEDIUM
Smoke only 60% MEDIUM
Hotspot 60-80°C 50% LOW
Roof Damage Severity
Type Low Medium High Critical
Missing shingle
Always
Crack <1" 1-3"
3" Multiple
Granule loss <10% 10-30%
30%
Ponding
Small Large Active leak
Wildfire Risk Factors (Weighted)
Factor Weight High Risk Indicators
Defensible space 20% Non-compliant zones
Vegetation density 20% NDVI >0.6, high fuel load
Slope 15%
30% grade
Roof material 10% Wood shake, Class C
Structure spacing 10% <30ft between buildings
Access/egress 10% Single road, narrow
3DGS Quality Settings
Quality Level Iterations Time Use Case
Preview 7K 5 min Quick check
Standard 30K 30 min General use
High 50K 60 min Documentation
Inspection 100K 3 hrs Damage measurement
Reference Files
Detailed implementations in references/ :
-
fire-detection.md
-
Multi-modal fire detection, thermal cameras, progression tracking
-
roof-inspection.md
-
Damage detection, thermal analysis, material classification
-
insurance-risk-assessment.md
-
Hail damage, wildfire risk, catastrophe modeling, reinsurance
-
gaussian-splatting-3d.md
-
COLMAP pipeline, 3DGS training, inspection measurements
Integration Points
-
drone-cv-expert: Flight control, navigation, general CV algorithms
-
metal-shader-expert: GPU-accelerated 3DGS rendering
-
collage-layout-expert: Visual report composition
-
clip-aware-embeddings: Material/damage classification assistance
Insurance Workflow
-
Pre-Event Assessment (Underwriting) ├─ Satellite: Regional risk context ├─ Drone: Property-level risk factors └─ Output: Risk score, premium factors
-
Post-Event Inspection (Claims) ├─ Drone survey: Damage documentation ├─ 3DGS: Measurements, change detection └─ Output: Claim package, cost estimate
-
Portfolio Risk (Reinsurance) ├─ Aggregate: TIV, loss curves ├─ Model: AAL, PML, concentration └─ Output: Treaty pricing, structure
Key Principle: Inspection accuracy depends on multi-source data fusion. Single-sensor assessments miss critical context. Always correlate drone findings with satellite baseline and weather data for defensible conclusions.