ExUnit Code Review
Quick Reference
Issue Type Reference
Async tests, setup, describe, tags references/exunit-patterns.md
Behavior-based mocking, expectations references/mox-boundaries.md
Bypass, Swoosh, Oban testing references/test-adapters.md
What to mock vs real, Ecto sandbox references/integration-tests.md
Mock Boundary Philosophy
Mock at external boundaries:
-
HTTP clients, external APIs, third-party services
-
Slow resources: file system, email, job queues
-
Non-deterministic: DateTime.utc_now(), :rand
DO NOT mock internal code:
-
Contexts, schemas, GenServers
-
Internal modules, PubSub
-
Anything you wrote
Review Checklist
Test Structure
-
Tests are async: true unless sharing database state
-
Describe-blocks group related tests
-
Setup extracts common test data
-
Tests have clear arrange/act/assert structure
Mocking
-
Mox used for external boundaries (HTTP, APIs)
-
Behaviors defined for mockable interfaces
-
No mocking of internal modules
-
verify_on_exit! in setup for strict mocking
Test Adapters
-
Bypass for HTTP endpoint mocking
-
Swoosh.TestAdapter for email testing
-
Oban.Testing for background job assertions
Database
-
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox for isolation
-
Async tests don't share database state
-
Fixtures/factories used consistently
Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)
-
Mock in unit test, real in integration - Different test levels have different needs
-
Not mocking database in integration tests - Database is internal
-
Simple inline test data - Not everything needs factories
-
Testing private functions via public API - Correct approach
Context-Sensitive Rules
Issue Flag ONLY IF
Not async Test actually needs shared state
Missing mock External call exists AND no mock/bypass
Mock internal Module being mocked is internal code
Before Submitting Findings
Use the issue format: [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE for each finding.
Load and follow review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.