ui-mockup

- Check for aesthetic library (Phase 0)

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "ui-mockup" with this command: npx skills add glittercowboy/plugin-freedom-system/glittercowboy-plugin-freedom-system-ui-mockup

<quick_start>

  • Check for aesthetic library (Phase 0)

  • Gather requirements through tiered questions (Phases 1-3)

  • Dispatch ui-design-agent for mockup generation

  • Iterate until user approves

  • Generate implementation files </quick_start>

<context_detection> <standalone_mode>

  • No .continue-here.md file present

  • Generates mockups independently

  • Skips state updates </standalone_mode>

<workflow_mode>

  • File plugins/[PluginName]/.continue-here.md exists with current_stage field

  • Updates workflow state after each phase </workflow_mode>

Check for .continue-here.md existence to determine mode. If present, update state files. If absent, skip state updates. </context_detection>

How would you like to start the UI design?

  • Start from aesthetic template - Apply saved visual system

  • Start from scratch - Create custom design

  • List all aesthetics - Browse library before deciding

Choose (1-3): _

See references/aesthetic-integration.md for complete integration details.

Include in invocation prompt:

  • All gathered requirements (layout, controls, colors, etc.)

  • Quality expectation: "Design must look like commercial $50-200 audio plugin - intentional decisions, not defaults"

See references/phase-details.md for invocation summary. See references/delegation-protocols.md for complete protocol.

Files generated:

  • v[N]-ui.yaml (design specification)

  • v[N]-ui-test.html (browser-testable mockup)

What would you like to do?

  • Iterate - Refine design, adjust layout

  • Finalize - Validate alignment and complete mockup

  • Save as template - Add to aesthetic library for reuse

  • Other

Choose (1-4): _

<iteration_guidance> When collecting feedback for Option 1 (Iterate):

If user provides specific changes ("make it vertical", "add a meter", "change colors to blue"):

  • Pass these as explicit requirements to new ui-design-agent instance

If user provides vague improvement requests ("make it better", "improve it", "polish it"):

  • Prompt for specifics: "What aspect should I focus on? (layout, colors, spacing, controls)"

  • If user says "everything" or "overall quality": Pass instruction to refine existing elements (spacing, color harmony, control styling) rather than add new elements </iteration_guidance>

See references/decision-menus.md#phase-5-5-design-decision-menu for detailed routing.

See references/phase-b-enforcement.md for guard implementation.

<orchestration_protocol> <delegation_rules> This skill NEVER generates mockup files directly. ALL file generation delegated to subagents.

See references/delegation-protocols.md for enforcement details. </delegation_rules>

<state_management> Subagents update .continue-here.md with their phase results. Orchestrator verifies stateUpdated flag in JSON report.

After subagent returns stateUpdated: true , verify actual state contents match expected values (not just boolean flag).

Read .continue-here.md , parse YAML, check specific fields match JSON report values. If mismatch, present state recovery menu.

See references/state-tracking.md for complete state schema and verification protocol. </state_management>

<iteration_protocol> Each iteration runs in fresh agent context. User chooses "Iterate" then orchestrator collects feedback and invokes NEW ui-design-agent with incremented version. Fresh context prevents context window bloat during iterative design. </iteration_protocol>

<error_handling>

  • Agent failures: Present error menu (retry/manual fix/debug/cancel).

  • Validation failures: Agent returns validationPassed: false

  • present error menu.

  • State update failures: Agent returns stateUpdated: false

  • present state recovery menu (verify/manual update/continue anyway). </error_handling> </orchestration_protocol>

<versioning_strategy> Pattern: v1, v2, v3... Each version saved separately.

Purpose: Explore layouts without losing work, A/B test designs, keep history for rollback.

File naming: All 7 files prefixed with version (e.g., v2-ui.html , v2-PluginEditor.h ).

Implementation: Latest version used for Stage 3 (GUI) unless user specifies different version.

See references/versioning.md for file management details. </versioning_strategy>

<success_criteria> <design_phase>

  • YAML spec generated matching user requirements

  • Browser test HTML works (interactive controls, parameter messages)

  • Visual quality meets commercial standard (intentional design, not defaults)

  • Design files committed to git

  • .continue-here.md updated with version (if workflow mode)

  • User presented with Phase 5.5 decision menu

  • Design approved OR user iterates with refinements </design_phase>

<implementation_phase>

  • All 7 files generated and saved to .ideas/mockups/

  • Production HTML complete (no placeholders)

  • C++ boilerplate matches YAML structure (correct parameter bindings)

  • parameter-spec.md generated and locked (v1 only)

  • Implementation files committed to git

  • .continue-here.md updated with finalization status (if workflow mode) </implementation_phase> </success_criteria>

<integration_points> <invoked_by>

  • /dream command - After creative brief, before implementation

  • plugin-workflow skill - During Stage 0 (UI design phase)

  • plugin-improve skill - When redesigning existing plugin UI

  • Natural language: "Design UI for [PluginName]", "Create mockup for compressor" </invoked_by>

<always_invokes>

  • ui-design-agent subagent (Phase 4-5.45) - REQUIRED for design iteration

  • ui-finalization-agent subagent (Phase 6-10.5) - REQUIRED for implementation files </always_invokes>

<also_invokes>

  • ui-template-library skill (if user saves aesthetic) </also_invokes>

<reference_documentation> Progressive disclosure - load references when reaching specific phases:

  • Phase 0: references/aesthetic-integration.md

  • Aesthetic library integration

  • Phase 1: references/context-extraction.md

  • Creative brief extraction

  • Phase 2-3: references/design-questions.md

  • Question templates and tiering

  • Phase 2.5: references/layout-validation.md

  • Dimension calculation formulas

  • Phase 4-5.45: references/delegation-protocols.md

  • Subagent invocation

  • Phase 5.5: references/decision-menus.md

  • Menu format and routing

  • Phase 5.6: references/state-tracking.md

  • Brief sync protocol

  • Phase 6-10: references/phase-b-enforcement.md

  • Phase B guard

  • Anti-patterns: references/common-pitfalls.md

  • What to avoid

Technical details:

  • references/html-generation.md

  • Production HTML rules

  • references/browser-testing.md

  • Browser test workflow

  • references/cmake-configuration.md

  • WebView build settings

  • references/cpp-boilerplate-generation.md

  • C++ template generation

  • references/ui-design-rules.md

  • Design constraints and patterns

  • references/versioning.md

  • File management </reference_documentation>

<template_assets>

  • assets/ui-yaml-template.yaml

  • YAML structure

  • assets/webview-boilerplate.md

  • C++ integration templates

  • assets/integration-checklist-template.md

  • Integration guide

  • assets/parameter-spec-template.md

  • Parameter specification format </template_assets>

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

ui-template-library

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

aesthetic-dreaming

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

plugin-packaging

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

plugin-planning

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review