flow-next-work

Execute a plan systematically. Focus on finishing.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "flow-next-work" with this command: npx skills add gmickel/gmickel-claude-marketplace/gmickel-gmickel-claude-marketplace-flow-next-work

Flow work

Execute a plan systematically. Focus on finishing.

Follow this skill and linked workflows exactly. Deviations cause drift, bad gates, retries, and user frustration.

IMPORTANT: This plugin uses .flow/ for ALL task tracking. Do NOT use markdown TODOs, plan files, TodoWrite, or other tracking methods. All task state must be read and written via flowctl .

CRITICAL: flowctl is BUNDLED — NOT installed globally. which flowctl will fail (expected). Always use:

FLOWCTL="${DROID_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}}/scripts/flowctl" $FLOWCTL <command>

Hard requirements (non-negotiable):

  • You MUST run flowctl done for each completed task and verify the task status is done .

  • You MUST stage with git add -A (never list files). This ensures .flow/ and scripts/ralph/ (if present) are included.

  • Do NOT claim completion until flowctl show <task> reports status: done .

  • Do NOT invoke /flow-next:impl-review until tests/Quick commands are green.

Role: execution lead, plan fidelity first. Goal: complete every task in order with tests.

Ralph Mode Rules (always follow)

If REVIEW_RECEIPT_PATH is set or FLOW_RALPH=1 :

  • Must use flowctl done and verify task status is done before committing.

  • Must stage with git add -A (never list files).

  • Do NOT use TodoWrite for tracking.

Input

Full request: $ARGUMENTS

Accepts:

  • Flow epic ID fn-N-slug (e.g., fn-1-add-oauth ) or legacy fn-N /fn-N-xxx to work through all tasks

  • Flow task ID fn-N-slug.M (e.g., fn-1-add-oauth.2 ) or legacy fn-N.M /fn-N-xxx.M to work on single task

  • Markdown spec file path (creates epic from file, then executes)

  • Idea text (creates minimal epic + single task, then executes)

  • Chained instructions like "then review with /flow-next:impl-review"

Examples:

  • /flow-next:work fn-1-add-oauth

  • /flow-next:work fn-1-add-oauth.3

  • /flow-next:work fn-1 (legacy formats fn-1, fn-1-xxx still supported)

  • /flow-next:work docs/my-feature-spec.md

  • /flow-next:work Add rate limiting

  • /flow-next:work fn-1-add-oauth then review via /flow-next:impl-review

If no input provided, ask for it.

FIRST: Parse Options or Ask Questions

Check configured backend:

REVIEW_BACKEND=$($FLOWCTL review-backend)

Returns: ASK (not configured), or rp /codex /none (configured).

Option Parsing (skip questions if found in arguments)

Parse the arguments for these patterns. If found, use them and skip corresponding questions:

Branch mode:

  • --branch=current or --current or "current branch" or "stay on this branch" → current branch

  • --branch=new or --new-branch or "new branch" or "create branch" → new branch

  • --branch=worktree or --worktree or "isolated worktree" or "worktree" → isolated worktree

Review mode:

  • --review=codex or "review with codex" or "codex review" or "use codex" → Codex CLI (GPT 5.2 High)

  • --review=rp or "review with rp" or "rp chat" or "repoprompt review" → RepoPrompt chat (via flowctl rp chat-send )

  • --review=export or "export review" or "external llm" → export for external LLM

  • --review=none or --no-review or "no review" or "skip review" → no review

If options NOT found in arguments

If REVIEW_BACKEND is rp, codex, or none (already configured): Only ask branch question. Show override hint:

Quick setup: Where to work? a) Current branch b) New branch c) Isolated worktree

(Reply: "a", "current", or just tell me) (Tip: --review=rp|codex|export|none overrides configured backend)

If REVIEW_BACKEND is ASK (not configured): Ask both branch AND review questions:

Quick setup before starting:

  1. Branch — Where to work? a) Current branch b) New branch c) Isolated worktree

  2. Review — Run Carmack-level review after? a) Codex CLI b) RepoPrompt c) Export for external LLM d) None (configure later with --review flag)

(Reply: "1a 2a", "current branch, codex", or just tell me naturally)

Wait for response. Parse naturally — user may reply terse or ramble via voice.

Defaults when empty/ambiguous:

  • Branch = new

  • Review = configured backend if set, else none (no auto-detect fallback)

Do NOT read files or write code until user responds.

Workflow

After setup questions answered, read phases.md and execute each phase in order.

Worker subagent model: Each task is implemented by a worker subagent with fresh context. This prevents context bleed between tasks and keeps re-anchor info with the implementation. The main conversation handles task selection and looping; worker handles implementation, commits, and reviews.

If user chose review, pass the review mode to the worker. The worker invokes /flow-next:impl-review after implementation and loops until SHIP.

Completion review gate: When all tasks in an epic are done, if --require-completion-review is configured (via flowctl next ), the work skill invokes /flow-next:epic-review before allowing the epic to close. This verifies the combined implementation satisfies the spec. The epic-review skill handles the fix loop internally until SHIP.

Guardrails

  • Don't start without asking branch question

  • Don't start without plan/epic

  • Don't skip tests

  • Don't leave tasks half-done

  • Never use TodoWrite for task tracking

  • Never create plan files outside .flow/

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

flow-next-plan-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

browser

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

flow-next

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

flow-plan-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review