lifecycle-sequence-generator

Lifecycle Sequence Generator for Crypto Neobanks

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "lifecycle-sequence-generator" with this command: npx skills add growgami/skills/growgami-skills-lifecycle-sequence-generator

Lifecycle Sequence Generator for Crypto Neobanks

Generates a complete 30-day lifecycle sequence for any crypto neobank type. Every touchpoint (email, push, in-app) is tied to a specific activation milestone and written in real user language, not marketing jargon.

Not a generic email template builder. Every sequence is grounded in crypto neobank churn data ($150-500 CAC, 63% month-one churn), real activation barriers (KYC rage cycles, trust tests, yield anxiety), and the specific language users use in app store reviews.

Trigger

  • generate lifecycle sequence for [company]

  • build onboarding emails for [neobank]

  • lifecycle marketing for [product type]

  • activation campaign for [neobank name]

Quick Start

Full sequence with company name

uv run python neobank-skills/lifecycle-sequence-generator/scripts/generate_sequence.py
--company "Plasma"
--product-type stablecoin
--goal first-deposit

Generic sequence for client proposals

uv run python neobank-skills/lifecycle-sequence-generator/scripts/generate_sequence.py
--company generic
--product-type crypto-card
--goal first-spend
--voice casual

Full options with file output

uv run python neobank-skills/lifecycle-sequence-generator/scripts/generate_sequence.py
--company "KAST"
--product-type crypto-card
--goal first-spend
--voice crypto-native
--output sequences/kast-activation.md

Arg Required Options

--company

Yes Any neobank name or "generic"

--product-type

Yes stablecoin, crypto-card, yield, self-custody, remittance, super-app

--goal

Yes first-deposit, first-spend, first-yield, kyc-complete

--voice

No (default: professional) casual, professional, crypto-native

--output

No (default: stdout) file path

Workflow

Step 1: Load Context

Before generating, the script loads:

  • Category pain points and user language from references/lifecycle-sequence-library.md

  • Activation timing benchmarks from references/activation-milestones.md

  • If company is not "generic": checks for app store review data at neobank-skills/app-store-intelligence/output/{slug}-reviews.json

If review data exists, the Day 3 message pulls real user complaint language directly from reviews. If not, it falls back to category-level pain language. The output header states which was used.

Step 2: Build the Sequence

For each of the 7 touchpoints (Day 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 30), three channels are generated:

Channel Output

Email Subject line + full body (100-250 words) + visual recommendation

Push notification Title + body (under 100 chars total)

In-app message Headline + CTA (under 60 chars)

What each touchpoint does:

  • Day 0: Welcome. Set expectations. Reduce fear. Drive one micro-action (email confirm or KYC start).

  • Day 1: Nudge toward activation goal. Remind them why they signed up. Address the most likely hesitation.

  • Day 3: Directly address the #1 drop-off barrier for this product type. No selling. Solve the problem.

  • Day 7: Social proof. Real numbers. Make staying feel smart, not just easy.

  • Day 14: Re-engage fence-sitters. One specific value proof point. One clear action.

  • Day 30: Graduation (activated) or hard reset (not activated, different CTA, different tone).

Day 0 and Day 1 are always sent. Days 3, 7, 14, 30 are conditional on activation status — the script generates both the activated and non-activated variants.

Step 3: Apply Quality Filters

Every message is checked against five rules before output:

  • Competitor test: Could Revolut, Coinbase, or any other neobank send this exact message? If yes, rewrite it.

  • Single CTA rule: Every touchpoint has one job and one CTA. No "also check out our features."

  • Real language rule: Copy mirrors user pain language, not marketing reframes.

  • Specificity rule: Numbers over adjectives. "$0 in fees" over "no fees". "Under 3 seconds" over "instant."

  • No slop rule: No em-dashes, no "seamless", no "we're excited/thrilled", no "innovative", no "cutting-edge."

Step 4: Output Format

Output is a single Markdown file structured for direct paste into Klaviyo, Customer.io, or Braze:

Lifecycle Sequence: [Company] — [Product Type] — Goal: [Goal]

Generated: [date] | Voice: [voice] | Review data: yes/no


Day 0 — Welcome

Activation Goal: [goal] Trigger: Account created Send: Immediately on signup

Email

Subject: [subject line]

[Email body]

CTA button: [text] → [destination]

Visual: [specific visual recommendation — what to show, the format (hero image / GIF / screenshot / illustration), and why it works for this touchpoint's goal]

Push Notification

Title: [title] Body: [body] Deep link: [screen]

In-App Message

Headline: [headline] Body: [body] CTA: [button text]

Quality Standards

The Specificity Test Every message must answer: could any other neobank in this category send this exact message? If yes, rewrite it. A stablecoin sequence must not read like a generic fintech onboarding. A self-custody sequence must not read like a yield product sequence.

The Activation Linkage Test Every message has ONE goal. Day 1 email has one CTA. Push has one tap destination. In-app has one button. Diluted messages produce diluted activation rates.

The Real Language Test Pull from user pain language in references/lifecycle-sequence-library.md . Real users write "the app froze during KYC" not "I experienced technical difficulties during identity verification." Copy should mirror the user's language, not reframe it in brand voice.

The Zero-Slop Test Banned: em-dashes (—), seamless, innovative, we're thrilled/excited, next-gen, cutting-edge, revolutionize. These are auto-rewrites, not style preferences.

Examples

User says: "Generate lifecycle sequence for Plasma, stablecoin, goal: first-deposit"

Actions:

  • Load stablecoin sequence framework from references/lifecycle-sequence-library.md

  • Check for Plasma app store review data at neobank-skills/app-store-intelligence/output/plasma-reviews.json

  • Map activation milestones: signup to KYC to wallet connection to first USDC deposit

  • Generate 7 touchpoints, each tied to first-deposit milestone

  • Apply crypto-native voice appropriate for Plasma's stablecoin product

  • Output Markdown ready to paste into Klaviyo

User says: "Build onboarding emails for a generic crypto card neobank"

Actions:

  • Load crypto-card framework from library

  • No company data — use category pain language and benchmarks

  • Map activation milestones: card order, card activation, first tap, first month spend

  • Generate with professional voice (default)

  • Include [Company Name] placeholder tokens throughout for client customization

Edge Cases

  • No app store data: Falls back to category pain language from the library. Output header notes this clearly.

  • Goal mismatch with product: first-yield for crypto-card is flagged. Script suggests the correct goal and asks to confirm before continuing.

  • Super-app product type: Has multiple possible goals. Generates sequence for the stated goal, adds a note about secondary activation goals to consider.

  • crypto-native voice + remittance or super-app: Flag raised in output. These products target mainstream users and crypto-native tone may create friction. Script recommends casual or professional voice instead but continues.

  • Brand "generic": All company-specific references use [Company Name] , [Product Name] tokens. Ready for white-label delivery to clients.

Files

Path Purpose

scripts/generate_sequence.py

Main CLI generator: inputs to full sequence output

references/lifecycle-sequence-library.md

Pre-built sequence frameworks for 6 neobank types

references/activation-milestones.md

Activation events, timing benchmarks, drop-off rates

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Web3

crypto-report

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
768-aahl
Web3

agentwallet

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Web3

valtio-define

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
434-hairyf
Web3

crypto-report

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review