conceptual-reviewer

Review code for conceptual errors, wrong assumptions, edge cases, and overcomplication; use after medium/large changes or when risk is high.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "conceptual-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add hideturno/andrej_hide_skills/hideturno-andrej-hide-skills-conceptual-reviewer

Conceptual Reviewer

Quick start

  • Re-check assumptions against the code.
  • Look for subtle logic or domain mistakes.
  • Call out overcomplexity and unused code.

Procedure

  1. Validate the solution against the stated criteria.
  2. Check for incorrect defaults or hidden assumptions.
  3. Scan for edge cases and boundary conditions.
  4. Identify unnecessary abstractions or bloat.
  5. Suggest the smallest fixes or tests.

Output format

  • Findings: ordered by severity.
  • Suggested fixes: minimal changes.
  • Missing tests: if any.

Guardrails

  • Focus on conceptual risk, not style.
  • Keep feedback specific and actionable.
  • If unsure, ask for clarification rather than guessing.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Open in GitHubOpen in ClawHub

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

assumption-clarifier

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
3-hideturno
General

plan-lite

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
3-hideturno
General

criteria-test-loop

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
3-hideturno
General

minimal-diff-implementer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
3-hideturno