systematic-debugging

Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "systematic-debugging" with this command: npx skills add hjewkes/agent-skills/hjewkes-agent-skills-systematic-debugging

Systematic Debugging

Overview

Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues.

Core principle: ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.

Violating the letter of this process is violating the spirit of debugging.

The Iron Law

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.

When to Use

Use for ANY technical issue: test failures, bugs, unexpected behavior, performance problems, build failures, integration issues.

Use ESPECIALLY when: under time pressure, "just one quick fix" seems obvious, you've already tried multiple fixes, you don't fully understand the issue.

Don't skip when: issue seems simple, you're in a hurry, manager wants it fixed NOW.

Quick Reference — The Four Phases

Phase Key Activities Success Criteria

  1. Root Cause Read errors, reproduce, check changes, gather evidence Understand WHAT and WHY

  2. Pattern Find working examples, compare Identify differences

  3. Hypothesis Form theory, test minimally Confirmed or new hypothesis

  4. Implementation Create test, fix, verify Bug resolved, tests pass

For detailed step-by-step instructions for each phase, see references/four-phases-detailed.md.

Red Flags — STOP and Follow Process

If you catch yourself thinking:

  • "Quick fix for now, investigate later"

  • "Just try changing X and see if it works"

  • "Add multiple changes, run tests"

  • "Skip the test, I'll manually verify"

  • "It's probably X, let me fix that"

  • "I don't fully understand but this might work"

  • "Here are the main problems: [lists fixes without investigation]"

  • Proposing solutions before tracing data flow

  • "One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+)

  • Each fix reveals new problem in different place

ALL of these mean: STOP. Return to Phase 1.

If 3+ fixes failed: Question the architecture (see Phase 4 in detailed reference).

Supporting Techniques

  • root-cause-tracing.md — Trace bugs backward through call stack

  • defense-in-depth.md — Add validation at multiple layers

  • condition-based-waiting.md — Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling

Related skills:

  • test-driven-development — For creating failing test case (Phase 4)

  • verification-before-completion — Verify fix worked before claiming success

For user signals, rationalizations table, and "no root cause" guidance, see references/debugging-signals.md.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

systematic-debugging

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

self-improve

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

skills-management

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

frontend-design

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review