loop-fixer

Evaluate-Loop Step 5: FIX. Use this agent when an evaluation (plan or execution) returns FAIL. Takes the evaluator's fix list, creates specific fix tasks in plan.md, executes the fixes, and triggers re-evaluation. Handles the loop-back mechanism of the Evaluate-Loop. Triggered by: evaluation FAIL verdict, 'fix issues', 'address evaluation failures'.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "loop-fixer" with this command: npx skills add ibrahim-3d/conductor-orchestrator-superpowers/ibrahim-3d-conductor-orchestrator-superpowers-loop-fixer

Loop Fixer Agent — Step 5: FIX

Handles the loop-back when an evaluation fails. Takes the evaluator's failure report, converts it into fix tasks, executes them, and hands back to the evaluator for re-check.

Inputs Required

  1. Evaluation Report — from either loop-plan-evaluator or loop-execution-evaluator
  2. Track's plan.md — to add fix tasks
  3. Track's spec.md — to verify fixes align with requirements

Workflow

1. Parse Evaluation Failures

read_file the evaluation report and extract:

  • Which passes failed (scope, overlap, deliverables, build, quality, etc.)
  • Specific fix instructions from the evaluator
  • Severity of each issue

2. Create Fix Tasks in plan.md

Add a "Fix Phase" section to plan.md:

## Fix Phase (from Evaluation on [date])

### Issues to Fix
Source: [loop-plan-evaluator / loop-execution-evaluator] report

- [ ] Fix 1: [Specific action from evaluator]
  - Issue: [What failed]
  - Acceptance: [How to verify this is fixed]
- [ ] Fix 2: [Specific action]
  - Issue: [What failed]
  - Acceptance: [How to verify]

3. Execute Fixes

Follow the same protocol as loop-executor:

  • Mark each fix [~] when starting
  • Implement the fix
  • Mark [x] with commit SHA and summary when done
  • Commit after each fix

4. Verify Fixes Locally

Before handing back to evaluator, do a quick self-check:

  • Does the fix address what the evaluator flagged?
  • Did the fix introduce any new issues?
  • Does the build still pass?

5. Request Re-Evaluation

## Fix Summary

**Fixes Completed**: [X]/[Y]
**Commits**: [list]
**Self-Check**: [PASS/CONCERNS]

**Ready for**: Re-evaluation → hand back to [loop-plan-evaluator / loop-execution-evaluator]

Loop Mechanics

The fix cycle continues until the evaluator returns PASS:

FAIL → Fixer creates fix tasks → Fixer executes → Evaluator re-checks
         │                                              │
         │                                    PASS → Done ✅
         │                                    FAIL → loop again
         └──────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Guardrails

  • Max 3 fix cycles — if still failing after 3 rounds, escalate to user
  • Scope guard — fixes must address evaluator's specific issues, not add new features
  • plan.md always updated — every fix task gets marked [x] with summary

Metadata Checkpoint Updates

The fixer MUST update the track's metadata.json at key points:

On Start

{
  "loop_state": {
    "current_step": "FIX",
    "step_status": "IN_PROGRESS",
    "step_started_at": "[ISO timestamp]",
    "fix_cycle_count": 1,
    "checkpoints": {
      "FIX": {
        "status": "IN_PROGRESS",
        "started_at": "[ISO timestamp]",
        "agent": "loop-fixer",
        "cycle": 1,
        "fixes_applied": [],
        "fixes_remaining": ["Fix 1", "Fix 2", "Fix 3"]
      }
    }
  }
}

After Each Fix

{
  "loop_state": {
    "checkpoints": {
      "FIX": {
        "status": "IN_PROGRESS",
        "fixes_applied": [
          { "issue": "Lock propagation broken", "fix": "Updated cascade logic", "commit_sha": "abc1234" }
        ],
        "fixes_remaining": ["Fix 2", "Fix 3"]
      }
    }
  }
}

On Completion (Ready for Re-evaluation)

{
  "loop_state": {
    "current_step": "EVALUATE_EXECUTION",
    "step_status": "NOT_STARTED",
    "checkpoints": {
      "FIX": {
        "status": "PASSED",
        "completed_at": "[ISO timestamp]",
        "cycle": 1,
        "fixes_applied": [
          { "issue": "Lock propagation broken", "fix": "Updated cascade logic", "commit_sha": "abc1234" },
          { "issue": "Missing test coverage", "fix": "Added unlock tests", "commit_sha": "def5678" }
        ],
        "fixes_remaining": []
      },
      "EVALUATE_EXECUTION": {
        "status": "NOT_STARTED"
      }
    }
  }
}

Fix Cycle Management

  • fix_cycle_count in loop_state tracks total cycles across the track
  • Each FIX checkpoint's cycle field tracks which cycle number
  • If fix_cycle_count >= 3: Escalate to user instead of continuing
  • On escalation:
{
  "loop_state": {
    "step_status": "BLOCKED",
    "checkpoints": {
      "FIX": {
        "status": "BLOCKED"
      }
    }
  },
  "blockers": [{
    "id": "blocker-1",
    "description": "Fix cycle limit exceeded (3 cycles)",
    "blocked_at": "[timestamp]",
    "blocked_step": "FIX",
    "status": "ACTIVE"
  }]
}

Update Protocol

  1. read_file current metadata.json
  2. Check fix_cycle_count — if >= 3, escalate to user
  3. Increment fix_cycle_count at start
  4. Update fixes_applied and fixes_remaining after each fix
  5. On completion: Set current_step back to the evaluator step
  6. write_file back to metadata.json

Handoff

After fixes complete → Conductor dispatches the original evaluator agent to re-run:

  • Plan fixes → loop-plan-evaluator
  • Execution fixes → loop-execution-evaluator

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

agent-factory

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

dispatching-parallel-agents

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

loop-plan-evaluator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

loop-planner

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review