Exa Load & Scale
Overview
Load testing, scaling strategies, and capacity planning for Exa integrations.
Prerequisites
-
k6 load testing tool installed
-
Kubernetes cluster with HPA configured
-
Prometheus for metrics collection
-
Test environment API keys
Load Testing with k6
Basic Load Test
// exa-load-test.js import http from 'k6/http'; import { check, sleep } from 'k6';
export const options = { stages: [ { duration: '2m', target: 10 }, // Ramp up { duration: '5m', target: 10 }, // Steady state { duration: '2m', target: 50 }, // Ramp to peak { duration: '5m', target: 50 }, // Stress test { duration: '2m', target: 0 }, // Ramp down ], thresholds: { http_req_duration: ['p(95)<500'], # HTTP 500 Internal Server Error http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'], }, };
export default function () {
const response = http.post(
'https://api.exa.com/v1/resource',
JSON.stringify({ test: true }),
{
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': Bearer ${__ENV.EXA_API_KEY},
},
}
);
check(response, { 'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200, # HTTP 200 OK 'latency < 500ms': (r) => r.timings.duration < 500, # HTTP 500 Internal Server Error });
sleep(1); }
Run Load Test
Install k6
brew install k6 # macOS
or: sudo apt install k6 # Linux
Run test
k6 run --env EXA_API_KEY=${EXA_API_KEY} exa-load-test.js
Run with output to InfluxDB
k6 run --out influxdb=http://localhost:8086/k6 exa-load-test.js # 8086 = configured value
Scaling Patterns
Horizontal Scaling
kubernetes HPA
apiVersion: autoscaling/v2 kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler metadata: name: exa-integration-hpa spec: scaleTargetRef: apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment name: exa-integration minReplicas: 2 maxReplicas: 20 metrics: - type: Resource resource: name: cpu target: type: Utilization averageUtilization: 70 - type: Pods pods: metric: name: exa_queue_depth target: type: AverageValue averageValue: 100
Connection Pooling
import { Pool } from 'generic-pool';
const exaPool = Pool.create({ create: async () => { return new ExaClient({ apiKey: process.env.EXA_API_KEY!, }); }, destroy: async (client) => { await client.close(); }, max: 20, min: 5, idleTimeoutMillis: 30000, # 30000: 30 seconds in ms });
async function withExaClient<T>( fn: (client: ExaClient) => Promise<T> ): Promise<T> { const client = await exaPool.acquire(); try { return await fn(client); } finally { exaPool.release(client); } }
Capacity Planning
Metrics to Monitor
Metric Warning Critical
CPU Utilization
70% 85%
Memory Usage
75% 90%
Request Queue Depth
100 500
Error Rate
1% 5%
P95 Latency
1000ms 3000ms
Capacity Calculation
interface CapacityEstimate { currentRPS: number; maxRPS: number; headroom: number; scaleRecommendation: string; }
function estimateExaCapacity( metrics: SystemMetrics ): CapacityEstimate { const currentRPS = metrics.requestsPerSecond; const avgLatency = metrics.p50Latency; const cpuUtilization = metrics.cpuPercent;
// Estimate max RPS based on current performance const maxRPS = currentRPS / (cpuUtilization / 100) * 0.7; // 70% target const headroom = ((maxRPS - currentRPS) / currentRPS) * 100;
return { currentRPS, maxRPS: Math.floor(maxRPS), headroom: Math.round(headroom), scaleRecommendation: headroom < 30 ? 'Scale up soon' : headroom < 50 ? 'Monitor closely' : 'Adequate capacity', }; }
Benchmark Results Template
Exa Performance Benchmark
Date: YYYY-MM-DD Environment: [staging/production] SDK Version: X.Y.Z
Test Configuration
- Duration: 10 minutes
- Ramp: 10 → 100 → 10 VUs
- Target endpoint: /v1/resource
Results
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Requests | 50,000 |
| Success Rate | 99.9% |
| P50 Latency | 120ms |
| P95 Latency | 350ms |
| P99 Latency | 800ms |
| Max RPS Achieved | 150 |
Observations
- [Key finding 1]
- [Key finding 2]
Recommendations
- [Scaling recommendation]
Instructions
Step 1: Create Load Test Script
Write k6 test script with appropriate thresholds.
Step 2: Configure Auto-Scaling
Set up HPA with CPU and custom metrics.
Step 3: Run Load Test
Execute test and collect metrics.
Step 4: Analyze and Document
Record results in benchmark template.
Output
-
Load test script created
-
HPA configured
-
Benchmark results documented
-
Capacity recommendations defined
Error Handling
Issue Cause Solution
k6 timeout Rate limited Reduce RPS
HPA not scaling Wrong metrics Verify metric name
Connection refused Pool exhausted Increase pool size
Inconsistent results Warm-up needed Add ramp-up phase
Examples
Quick k6 Test
k6 run --vus 10 --duration 30s exa-load-test.js
Check Current Capacity
const metrics = await getSystemMetrics(); const capacity = estimateExaCapacity(metrics); console.log('Headroom:', capacity.headroom + '%'); console.log('Recommendation:', capacity.scaleRecommendation);
Scale HPA Manually
set -euo pipefail kubectl scale deployment exa-integration --replicas=5 kubectl get hpa exa-integration-hpa
Resources
-
k6 Documentation
-
Kubernetes HPA
-
Exa Rate Limits
Next Steps
For reliability patterns, see exa-reliability-patterns .