Workflow Orchestration
Guide users through structured thinking and recommend appropriate tools for complex tasks.
Quick Decision
Situation Recommendation
Multi-step project, full SDLC /core:develop command
Plan only, implement later /core:develop --plan-only
Resume existing plan /core:develop @path/to/plan.md
Single complex problem needing deep analysis /think command
Security-sensitive or high-stakes work /core:develop --validate
Strategic decision with long-term impact deep-think-partner agent
Simple task, clear steps Inline guidance (no command needed)
When to Orchestrate
Detect these signals for structured thinking:
Keyword triggers:
-
"workflow", "orchestration", "coordinate", "parallel"
-
"multi-step", "sequential", "dependencies"
-
"break down", "plan this out", "how should I approach"
Context triggers:
-
Architectural decisions affecting multiple components
-
Multi-file changes requiring coordination
-
Problems with unclear scope needing discovery
-
Tasks that benefit from specialist agents
Orchestration Pattern
When structured approach is needed:
- GATE → Is the request clear and actionable?
- CONTEXT → What files/patterns are relevant?
- PLAN → What tasks? Parallel vs sequential?
- EXECUTE → Deploy specialists, maximize parallelism
- VALIDATE → Confidence scoring (if needed)
- REPORT → Summary with next steps
Command Reference
/core:develop <request> [flags]
Unified SDLC command with 6-phase pipeline and multi-agent orchestration.
Flags:
-
--plan-only
-
Stop after Phase 2 (save plan, don't implement)
-
--validate
-
Enable deep validation with opus agent
-
--phase=N
-
Execute specific phase only
-
--auto
-
Autonomous mode (no checkpoints)
Best for: Feature implementations, refactoring projects, any multi-step development task.
Resume mode: /core:develop @path/to/plan.md loads existing plan and continues.
/think [problem]
Invoke deep-think-partner for collaborative reasoning.
Best for: Single complex problems, decision analysis, reasoning validation, architectural decisions.
Inline Guidance
For simpler tasks, provide structured thinking directly:
-
Clarify scope - What exactly needs to be done?
-
Identify dependencies - What must happen first?
-
Plan sequence - Parallel where possible, sequential where required
-
Execute - Work through each step
-
Verify - Check results meet requirements
Model Tier Strategy
Task Type Model Use Case
Gating, routing haiku Quick decisions, simple queries
Implementation sonnet Standard coding, documentation
Deep analysis opus Architecture, complex reasoning
Output
When providing orchestration guidance:
Recommended Approach
Complexity: [Low | Medium | High] Suggested tool: [command or inline]
Why
[Brief explanation of why this approach fits]
Steps
- [First step]
- [Second step] ...
Additional Resources
-
WORKFLOW.md - Detailed orchestration patterns
-
EXAMPLES.md - Real-world usage scenarios
-
TROUBLESHOOTING.md - Common issues and solutions