requirements-writing

Requirements Writing Skill

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "requirements-writing" with this command: npx skills add kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev/kaakati-rails-enterprise-dev-requirements-writing

Requirements Writing Skill

You are assisting with writing clear, testable requirements that drive development and testing for Manifest Logistics SaaS.

Core Principles

Requirements Should Be

  • Clear: Unambiguous and understandable

  • Testable: Can be verified through RSpec/Cucumber

  • Complete: All necessary information included

  • Consistent: No contradictions

  • Traceable: Linked to business needs

  • Feasible: Technically and economically possible

Primary Format: User Stories + Gherkin

User Stories (High-Level Features)

Format:

As a [role] I want [feature/capability] So that [benefit/value]

Good Examples:

As a Merchant I want to create delivery tasks via API So that my e-commerce orders are automatically dispatched

As a Carrier I want to see bundled tasks on my route So that I can deliver multiple packages efficiently

As an Account Admin I want to configure SMS templates So that recipients receive branded notifications

Bad Examples:

As a user, I want a button # Too vague As a developer, I want to use Sidekiq # Technical, not user-focused The system should create tasks # Not user-story format

Acceptance Criteria (Detailed Requirements)

For each user story, define acceptance criteria using Gherkin scenarios.

Gherkin Format:

Feature: [Feature name and brief description] [Optional: Longer description explaining business value]

Scenario: [Specific situation to test] Given [initial context/preconditions] And [additional context] When [action/event occurs] Then [expected outcome] And [additional expectations]

Complete Example for Manifest

Feature: Zone-Based Task Bundling As a dispatch system I need to bundle delivery tasks by origin and destination zones So that carriers can deliver multiple packages efficiently

Scenario: Tasks from same origin zone to same destination zone are bundled Given a Zone "Riyadh-North" exists as origin And a Zone "Riyadh-East" exists as destination And 3 pending tasks exist from "Riyadh-North" to "Riyadh-East" When the bundling service runs Then the tasks should be grouped into 1 bundle And the bundle status should be "ready_for_dispatch"

Scenario: Tasks to different destination zones are not bundled together Given a Zone "Riyadh-North" exists as origin And a Zone "Riyadh-East" exists as destination And a Zone "Riyadh-West" exists as destination And 2 pending tasks exist from "Riyadh-North" to "Riyadh-East" And 1 pending task exists from "Riyadh-North" to "Riyadh-West" When the bundling service runs Then 2 separate bundles should be created

Scenario: Express tasks are not bundled with Next-Day tasks Given 2 Express tasks exist for Zone "Riyadh-East" And 2 Next-Day tasks exist for Zone "Riyadh-East" When the bundling service runs Then Express tasks should be in a separate bundle And Next-Day tasks should be in a separate bundle

Scenario: Single task creates single-item bundle Given only 1 pending task exists for Zone "Riyadh-East" When the bundling service runs Then the task should be bundled alone And the bundle should be dispatchable

Gherkin Best Practices

  1. Use Domain Language

Use terms from Manifest's ubiquitous language:

GOOD

Given a Merchant "Salla Store" exists for the Account When creating a Task with delivery_type "express" And the recipient Zone is "Jeddah-Central"

BAD

Given a store exists When making a delivery order And the area is downtown

  1. One Scenario, One Behavior

GOOD - Tests one thing

Scenario: OTP verification completes Express delivery Given a Task with status "out_for_delivery" And the Task requires OTP verification When the Carrier submits correct OTP "1234" Then the Task status should be "delivered"

BAD - Tests multiple things

Scenario: OTP and payment and status Given a Task exists When carrier submits OTP and collects cash Then multiple things happen

  1. Use Background for Common Setup

Feature: Carrier Task Assignment

Background: Given an Account "Acme Logistics" exists And a Carrier "Mohammed" is active for the Account And the following Zones exist: | Zone Name | City | | Riyadh-North | Riyadh | | Riyadh-East | Riyadh |

Scenario: Carrier assigned to tasks within their zones Given "Mohammed" is assigned to Zone "Riyadh-North" And a Task exists for Zone "Riyadh-North" When auto-assigning carriers Then "Mohammed" should be assigned to the Task

Scenario: Carrier not assigned to tasks outside their zones Given "Mohammed" is assigned to Zone "Riyadh-North" And a Task exists for Zone "Riyadh-East" When auto-assigning carriers Then "Mohammed" should not be assigned to the Task

  1. Use Scenario Outlines for Multiple Cases

Scenario Outline: Task status transitions Given a Task with status "<current_status>" When the event "<event>" occurs Then the Task status should be "<new_status>"

Examples: | current_status | event | new_status | | pending | dispatch | dispatched | | dispatched | pickup | picked_up | | picked_up | out_for_delivery | out_for_delivery | | out_for_delivery | deliver | delivered | | out_for_delivery | fail_delivery | failed_attempt | | failed_attempt | return_to_facility | sorting_facility |

Requirements Categories

  1. Functional Requirements

What the system must do.

User Story:

As an Account Admin I want to view all tasks ranked by priority and age So that I can identify delayed deliveries

Gherkin Scenario:

Scenario: Tasks sorted by priority then creation date Given the following Tasks exist: | Reference | Priority | Created At | | TASK-001 | high | 2 days ago | | TASK-002 | normal | 1 day ago | | TASK-003 | high | 1 day ago | When viewing the task queue Then the order should be: | Rank | Reference | | 1 | TASK-001 | | 2 | TASK-003 | | 3 | TASK-002 |

  1. Non-Functional Requirements

How the system should behave.

Categories:

  • Performance (response time, throughput)

  • Security (authentication, authorization)

  • Reliability (uptime, error handling)

  • Scalability (concurrent users, data volume)

  • Maintainability (code quality, documentation)

Format:

The system shall [requirement] Measured by [metric]

Examples:

The system shall process webhook deliveries within 500ms Measured by: Average response time for POST /api/v1/tasks

The system shall handle 10,000 concurrent task updates Measured by: Load testing with simulated peak traffic

The system shall maintain 99.9% uptime Measured by: Monthly uptime percentage

The system shall process SMS notifications within 5 seconds Measured by: Time from task status change to SMS delivery

  1. Business Rules

Constraints and policies from the domain.

Feature: 3PL Handoff Rules Business Rule: Tasks destined for cities without carrier coverage must be handed off to integrated 3PL providers after sorting.

Scenario: Task handed to 3PL when destination city has no coverage Given the Account has no Carriers covering "Dammam" And the Account has 3PL integration with "SMSA" for "Dammam" And a Task exists with destination city "Dammam" When the Task arrives at sorting facility Then a 3PL label should be generated via "SMSA" And the Task should transition to "awaiting_3pl_pickup"

Requirements Organization

Directory Structure

requirements/ ├── user-stories/ │ ├── merchant-stories.md │ ├── carrier-stories.md │ ├── admin-stories.md │ └── recipient-stories.md ├── features/ │ ├── task-management.feature │ ├── zone-bundling.feature │ ├── carrier-dispatch.feature │ ├── 3pl-integration.feature │ ├── billing.feature │ └── notifications.feature ├── business-rules/ │ ├── delivery-rules.md │ ├── bundling-policies.md │ └── cod-collection-rules.md └── non-functional/ ├── performance-requirements.md ├── security-requirements.md └── scalability-requirements.md

Requirement Quality Checklist

Use the INVEST criteria for user stories:

  • Independent: Can be developed independently

  • Negotiable: Details can be discussed

  • Valuable: Delivers value to users

  • Estimable: Can estimate effort

  • Small: Can be completed in one sprint

  • Testable: Can verify when done

For Gherkin scenarios:

  • Uses Manifest domain language

  • Tests one specific behavior

  • Has clear Given-When-Then structure

  • Includes edge cases and error conditions

  • Is executable (can be automated with Cucumber/RSpec)

Example Mapping (Discovery Technique)

Before writing requirements, use Example Mapping to explore:

Rule: Express deliveries require OTP verification

Examples: ✓ Correct OTP submitted → Task delivered ✓ Incorrect OTP submitted → Rejected, retry allowed ✗ 3 failed OTP attempts → Task marked for callback ✗ OTP expired after 10 minutes → New OTP generated

Questions: ? What if recipient is unavailable and alternative contact accepts? ? Should OTP be required for zero-value (non-COD) deliveries? ? How to handle OTP when recipient has no phone?

Then write Gherkin scenarios for each example + questions.

Integration with TDD

Requirements drive test development:

  • Write User Story: Define what's needed

  • Write Gherkin Scenarios: Define acceptance criteria

  • Generate Step Definitions: Convert scenarios to RSpec/Cucumber

  • Implement TDD: Red-Green-Refactor cycle

Traceability:

User Story → Gherkin Scenario → Cucumber/RSpec Test → Service Object Implementation

Manifest Domain Examples

Example 1: Cash on Delivery Collection

User Story: As an Account Admin I want COD amounts automatically tracked in Carrier wallets So that I can reconcile cash collections accurately

Acceptance Criteria:

Feature: COD Wallet Tracking Cash collected by Carriers is tracked in their Wallet and must be reconciled before payout.

Scenario: COD amount added to Carrier wallet on delivery Given a Carrier "Ahmed" has wallet balance 0 SAR And a Task with COD amount 150 SAR assigned to "Ahmed" When "Ahmed" marks the Task as delivered Then "Ahmed" wallet balance should be 150 SAR And a wallet transaction "cod_collection" should be recorded

Scenario: Multiple COD collections accumulate Given a Carrier "Ahmed" has wallet balance 200 SAR And a Task with COD amount 100 SAR assigned to "Ahmed" When "Ahmed" marks the Task as delivered Then "Ahmed" wallet balance should be 300 SAR

Example 2: SMS Notification Templates

User Story: As an Account Admin I want to customize SMS templates with placeholders So that recipients receive branded, relevant notifications

Acceptance Criteria:

Feature: SMS Template Processing

Scenario: Template placeholders are replaced with task data Given an SMS template with body: """ Your order {{task_reference}} is out for delivery. Track: {{tracking_url}} """ And a Task with reference "ORD-12345" And tracking URL "https://track.manifest.sa/ORD-12345" When sending the delivery notification Then the SMS body should be: """ Your order ORD-12345 is out for delivery. Track: https://track.manifest.sa/ORD-12345 """

Scenario: Missing placeholder data handled gracefully Given an SMS template with body "Contact: {{alternative_phone}}" And a Task with no alternative contact When sending the notification Then the placeholder should be replaced with empty string And no error should be raised

Example 3: Multi-Tenant Data Isolation

Feature: Account Data Isolation All data must be scoped to the owning Account to ensure multi-tenant security.

Scenario: Tasks only visible to owning Account Given Account "Acme" has 5 Tasks And Account "Beta" has 3 Tasks When "Acme" admin queries their Tasks Then only 5 Tasks should be returned And no Tasks from "Beta" should be visible

Scenario: Carrier cannot access other Account's Tasks Given Carrier "Ahmed" belongs to Account "Acme" And a Task belongs to Account "Beta" When "Ahmed" attempts to view the Task Then access should be denied And an authorization error should be logged

Response Format

When writing requirements:

  • Start with a user story to capture WHO, WHAT, WHY

  • Add Gherkin scenarios for detailed acceptance criteria

  • Include happy path, edge cases, and error conditions

  • Use Manifest domain language consistently

  • Ensure scenarios are testable and executable

  • Link requirements to business rules

  • Consider non-functional requirements

Tools for Requirements Management

  • BDD Tools: RSpec, Cucumber (Ruby)

  • Documentation: Markdown, Gherkin .feature files

  • Collaboration: Example Mapping sessions

  • Traceability: Link stories → scenarios → tests → code

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

flutter conventions & best practices

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

getx state management patterns

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ruby oop patterns

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

rails localization (i18n) - english & arabic

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review