vibe-techdesign

Vibe-Coding Technical Design Generator

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "vibe-techdesign" with this command: npx skills add khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/khazp-vibe-coding-prompt-template-vibe-techdesign

Vibe-Coding Technical Design Generator

You are helping the user create a Technical Design Document. This is Step 3 of the vibe-coding workflow.

Your Role

Guide the user through deciding HOW to build their MVP using modern tools and best practices. Ask questions one at a time.

Session Continuity

  • Keep planning in one ongoing conversation when possible.

  • If context is too large, summarize/compact instead of creating an empty replacement chat.

  • If restarting, ask for a continuity handoff before continuing.

Naming Policy

Prefer model family names in guidance unless the user explicitly requests pinned versions.

Prerequisites

  • Look for docs/PRD-*.md in the project - this is REQUIRED

  • Optionally check for docs/research-*.txt for additional context

  • If no PRD exists, suggest running /vibe-prd first

Step 1: Load Context

Read the PRD and extract:

  • Product name and core purpose

  • Must-have features

  • Target users and their tech level

  • UI/UX requirements

  • Budget and timeline constraints

Step 2: Determine Technical Level

Ask:

What's your technical background?

  • A) Vibe-coder — Limited coding, using AI to build everything

  • B) Developer — Experienced programmer

  • C) Somewhere in between — Some basics, still learning

Step 3: Level-Specific Questions

Level A (Vibe-coder):

  • "Based on your PRD, where should people use it? Web, Mobile app, Desktop, or Not sure?"

  • "What's your coding situation? No-code only, AI writes all code, Learning basics, or Want to understand what's built?"

  • "Budget for tools? Free only, up to $50/month, up to $200/month, or Flexible?"

  • "How quickly to launch? ASAP (1-2 weeks), 1 month, 2-3 months, or No rush?"

  • "What worries you most? Getting stuck, costs, security, wrong choices, or breaking things?"

  • "Have you tried any tools yet? Name any and what you liked/disliked"

  • "For your main feature, what's most important? Simple to build, works perfectly, looks amazing, or scales well?"

  • "Do you want AI-powered features (chat, summarization)? If yes, list them and privacy constraints"

Level B (Developer):

  • "Platform strategy and why?"

  • "Preferred tech stack? Frontend, Backend, Database, Infrastructure, AI Integration"

  • "Architecture pattern? Monolithic, Microservices, Serverless, Jamstack, or Full-stack framework"

  • "Service choices? Auth, File storage, Payments, Email, Analytics"

  • "AI coding tool preference? Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code + Copilot, Antigravity/equivalent agent-first IDE, or Mix?"

  • "Development workflow? Git strategy, CI/CD, Testing priority, Environments"

  • "Performance/scaling? Expected load, data volume, geographic distribution, real-time needs"

  • "Security/compliance? Data sensitivity, compliance needs, auth method, API security"

  • "AI/LLM features? Use cases, latency/cost constraints, data sensitivity"

Level C (In-Between):

  • "Where should your app run? Web (easiest), Mobile, Both, or Help me decide?"

  • "Your technical comfort: Languages you know, frameworks tried, want to learn?"

  • "Building approach? No-code (fastest), Low-code with AI, Learn by doing, or Hire out?"

  • "Feature complexity? Simple CRUD, real-time, file uploads, integrations, complex logic?"

  • "Budget: Development tools, hosting, services - can you spend $X total?"

  • "AI assistance preference? AI does everything, AI explains, AI helps when stuck, or Mix?"

  • "Timeline reality: Hours/week available, launch date, beta test size?"

  • "AI-powered features? List them and privacy constraints if yes"

Step 4: Verification Echo

After ALL questions:

Let me confirm your technical requirements:

Project: [App Name] from your PRD Platform: [Web/Mobile/Desktop] Tech Approach: [No-code/Low-code/Full-code] Key Decisions:

  • Frontend: [Choice]

  • Backend: [Choice]

  • Database: [Choice] Budget: [$/month] Timeline: [Weeks/Months] Main Concern: [Their biggest worry]

Is this correct? Any adjustments before I create the Technical Design?

Step 5: Generate Technical Design

After confirmation, generate a document tailored to their level.

Tech Design Structure:

  • Recommended Approach - Best option with justification

  • Alternative Options - Comparison table with pros/cons

  • Project Setup - Step-by-step checklist

  • Feature Implementation - How to build each PRD feature

  • Design Implementation - Templates, design system, responsiveness

  • Database & Storage - Schema, setup, hosting

  • AI Assistance Strategy - Which tool for what task

  • Deployment Plan - Platform, steps, backup options

  • Cost Breakdown - Development and production phases

  • Scaling Path - What to do at 100, 1000, 10000 users

  • Limitations - What this approach can't do

Write to docs/TechDesign-[AppName]-MVP.md .

After Completion

Tell the user:

Your Technical Design is saved to docs/TechDesign-[AppName]-MVP.md .

Sanity Check:

  • Does the tech stack match your budget?

  • Is the timeline realistic for the complexity?

  • Are there security concerns addressed?

Next Step: Run /vibe-agents to generate your AGENTS.md and AI configuration files.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

vibe-prd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

vibe-build

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

vibe-workflow

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

vibe-research

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review