code-review

When reviewing code, follow this systematic approach to ensure thorough evaluation:

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "code-review" with this command: npx skills add kyegomez/swarms/kyegomez-swarms-code-review

Code Review Skill

When reviewing code, follow this systematic approach to ensure thorough evaluation:

Review Checklist

  1. Code Quality
  • Readability: Is the code easy to understand?

  • Naming: Are variables, functions, and classes well-named?

  • Structure: Is the code properly organized and modular?

  • Comments: Are complex sections adequately documented?

  • Complexity: Are there overly complex functions that should be simplified?

  1. Security Analysis

Check for common vulnerabilities:

  • SQL injection vulnerabilities

  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) vulnerabilities

  • Authentication and authorization flaws

  • Insecure data handling (passwords, sensitive data)

  • Input validation and sanitization

  • OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities

  1. Performance Considerations
  • Identify potential bottlenecks

  • Check for inefficient algorithms or data structures

  • Look for unnecessary database queries or API calls

  • Evaluate caching opportunities

  • Assess memory usage patterns

  1. Best Practices
  • DRY Principle: Eliminate code duplication

  • SOLID Principles: Verify adherence to design principles

  • Error Handling: Check for proper exception handling

  • Testing: Evaluate test coverage and quality

  • Dependencies: Review external dependencies and their versions

  1. Maintainability
  • Is the code easy to modify and extend?

  • Are there proper abstractions?

  • Is the architecture scalable?

  • Are there technical debt concerns?

Review Format

Structure your review as follows:

  • Summary: High-level overview of the changes

  • Critical Issues: Security vulnerabilities or bugs that must be fixed

  • Major Concerns: Significant issues affecting quality or performance

  • Suggestions: Optional improvements and best practices

  • Positive Feedback: Acknowledge good practices and improvements

Guidelines

  • Be constructive and respectful

  • Provide specific examples and suggestions

  • Explain the "why" behind recommendations

  • Prioritize issues by severity (critical, major, minor)

  • Reference documentation or standards when applicable

  • Consider the context and constraints of the project

Example Reviews

Security Issue:

CRITICAL: SQL injection vulnerability detected at line 45 Current: f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}" Recommendation: Use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection

Performance Suggestion:

SUGGESTION: Consider caching database results at line 123 The same query is executed multiple times in the loop. Cache the results to improve performance by ~80%.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Research

financial-analysis

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

data-visualization

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

Sharedintellect Quorum

Multi-agent validation framework — 6 independent AI critics evaluate artifacts against rubrics with evidence-grounded findings.

Registry SourceRecently Updated
3670Profile unavailable
Coding

Cortex Engine

Persistent cognitive memory for AI agents — query, record, review, and consolidate knowledge across sessions with spreading activation, FSRS scheduling, and...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
331Profile unavailable