ln-005-agent-reviewer

Paths: File paths (shared/ , references/ , ../ln-* ) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "ln-005-agent-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/levnikolaevich-claude-code-skills-ln-005-agent-reviewer

Paths: File paths (shared/ , references/ , ../ln-* ) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

Agent Reviewer (Universal)

Runs parallel external agent reviews on arbitrary context, critically verifies suggestions, returns filtered improvements.

Purpose & Scope

  • Standalone utility in 0XX category (like ln-003, ln-004)

  • Delegate any context to codex-review + gemini-review as background tasks in parallel

  • Context always passed via file references (never inline in prompt)

  • Process results as they arrive (first-finished agent processed immediately)

  • Critically verify each suggestion; debate with agent if Claude disagrees

  • Return filtered, deduplicated, verified suggestions

When to Use

  • Manual invocation by user for independent review of any artifact

  • Called by any skill needing external second opinion on plans, decisions, documents

  • NOT tied to Linear, NOT tied to any pipeline

  • Works with any context that can be saved to a file

Parameters

Parameter Value

review_type

contextreview

skill_group

005

prompt_template

shared/agents/prompt_templates/context_review.md

verdict_acceptable

CONTEXT_ACCEPTABLE

Inputs

Input Required Description

context_files

Yes List of file paths containing context to review (relative to CWD)

identifier

No Short label for file naming (default: review_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS )

focus

No List of areas to focus on (default: all 6)

review_title

No Human-readable title (default: "Context Review" )

Context delivery rule: Context is ALWAYS passed via files.

  • If context already exists as files (plans, docs, code) -> pass file paths directly

  • If context is a statement/decision from chat -> caller creates a temporary file in .agent-review/context/ with the content, then passes the file path

Workflow

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/agent_review_workflow.md for Health Check, Ensure .agent-review/, Load Review Memory, Run Agents, Critical Verification + Debate, Aggregate + Return, Save Review Summary, Fallback Rules, Critical Rules, and Definition of Done. Load shared/references/agent_delegation_pattern.md for Reference Passing Pattern, Review Persistence Pattern, Agent Timeout Policy, and Debate Protocol.

Unique Steps (before shared workflow)

Health check: per shared workflow, filter by skill_group = 005 .

Resolve identifier: If identifier not provided, generate review_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS . Sanitize: lowercase, replace spaces with hyphens, ASCII only.

Ensure .agent-review/: per shared workflow. Additionally create .agent-review/context/ subdir if it doesn't exist (for materialized context files).

Materialize context (if needed): If context is from chat/conversation (not an existing file):

  • Write content to .agent-review/context/{identifier}_context.md

  • Add this path to context_files list

Build prompt: Read template shared/agents/prompt_templates/context_review.md .

  • Replace {review_title} with title or "Context Review"

  • Replace {context_refs} with bullet list: - {path} per context file

  • Replace {focus_areas} with filtered subset or "All default areas" if no focus specified

  • Save to .agent-review/{identifier}_contextreview_prompt.md (single shared file -- both agents read the same prompt)

Shared Workflow Steps

6-9) Load Review Memory, Run agents, Critical Verification + Debate, Aggregate + Return: per shared workflow.

  • {review_type} in challenge template = review_title or "Context Review"

  • {story_ref} in challenge template = identifier

  • Save Review Summary: per shared workflow "Step: Save Review Summary".

Output Format

verdict: CONTEXT_ACCEPTABLE | SUGGESTIONS | SKIPPED suggestions:

  • area: "logic | feasibility | completeness | consistency | best_practices | risk" issue: "What is wrong or could be improved" suggestion: "Specific actionable change" confidence: 95 impact_percent: 15 source: "codex-review" resolution: "accepted | accepted_after_debate | accepted_after_followup | rejected"

Agent stats and debate log per shared workflow output schema.

Verdict Escalation

  • No escalation. Suggestions are advisory only.

  • Caller decides how to apply accepted suggestions.

Reference Files

  • Shared workflow: shared/references/agent_review_workflow.md

  • Agent delegation pattern: shared/references/agent_delegation_pattern.md

  • Prompt template (review): shared/agents/prompt_templates/context_review.md

  • Review schema: shared/agents/schemas/context_review_schema.json

Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-25

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

ln-782-test-runner

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ln-140-test-docs-creator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ln-150-presentation-creator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ln-110-project-docs-coordinator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review