paper-writing-section

Write a specific section of an academic paper (Abstract, Introduction, Background, Related Work, Methods, Experiments, Results, Discussion/Conclusion) with section-specific guidance and two-pass refinement. Use when the user wants to write, draft, or improve a paper section.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "paper-writing-section" with this command: npx skills add lingzhi227/agent-research-skills/lingzhi227-agent-research-skills-paper-writing-section

Paper Section Writer

Write a publication-quality section for an academic paper.

Input

  • $0 — Section name: abstract, introduction, background, related-work, methods, experimental-setup, results, discussion, conclusion
  • $1 — (Optional) Path to context file (research plan, results, prior sections)

Workflow

Step 1: Gather Context

Read the paper's existing .tex files, experiment logs, result files, and any provided context. Understand: title, contributions, methodology, key results, figures, tables.

Step 2: Write the Section

Load section-specific tips from references/section-tips.md. Before every paragraph, include a brief plan as a LaTeX comment (% Plan: ...).

Step 3: Two-Pass Refinement

Apply both refinement passes from references/refinement-prompts.md:

  • Pass 1: Fix errors (unenclosed math, broken refs, hallucinated numbers, duplicate labels)
  • Pass 2: Remove redundancies, compress, ensure smooth transitions

References

  • Section writing tips: ~/.claude/skills/paper-writing-section/references/section-tips.md
  • Refinement prompts and error checklist: ~/.claude/skills/paper-writing-section/references/refinement-prompts.md

Output

LaTeX fragment (no \documentclass, no preamble). All math enclosed in $...$ or \begin{equation}, all figures referenced with \ref{}, all cited works use \cite{}, no placeholder text.

Quality Checklist

  • All math enclosed properly
  • All \ref{} and \cite{} valid
  • No TODO/TBD/FIXME markers
  • Numbers match experimental logs exactly
  • Writing style is objective — no hype words
  • Section length appropriate for venue

Related Skills

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Open in GitHubOpen in ClawHub

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Research

literature-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
49-lingzhi227
Research

deep-research

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
43-lingzhi227
Research

literature-search

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
41-lingzhi227
Research

novelty-assessment

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
38-lingzhi227