CHANGELOG Generator Skill
Purpose
This skill provides systematic guidance for generating CHANGELOG entries that follow conventional commits format and semantic versioning principles, ensuring clear and consistent change history documentation.
When to Use
-
After feature implementation and documentation updates
-
Need to document changes for users and developers
-
Following conventional commits format
-
Determining semantic version increments
-
Creating release notes
CHANGELOG Generation Workflow
- Analyze Changes
Objective: Understand what changed in this feature/fix.
Review commit history:
View commits since last release/main
git log --oneline main..HEAD
View detailed commits
git log main..HEAD
View files changed
git diff --stat main..HEAD
View actual changes
git diff main..HEAD
Identify change types:
-
New features added
-
Bug fixes implemented
-
Documentation updates
-
Performance improvements
-
Security enhancements
-
Breaking changes
-
Deprecations
Review issue and PR:
-
Read original issue description
-
Review acceptance criteria
-
Check PR description
-
Note any breaking changes
-
Identify security implications
Deliverable: Clear understanding of all changes
- Determine Change Type
Objective: Classify the change according to conventional commits.
Conventional Commit Types:
Type Description Version Impact Use When
feat
New feature MINOR (0.X.0) Adding new functionality
fix
Bug fix PATCH (0.0.X) Fixing a bug
docs
Documentation PATCH (0.0.X) Only docs changed
style
Code style PATCH (0.0.X) Formatting, whitespace
refactor
Code refactoring PATCH (0.0.X) Code restructure, no behavior change
perf
Performance PATCH (0.0.X) Performance improvements
test
Tests PATCH (0.0.X) Adding/updating tests
chore
Maintenance PATCH (0.0.X) Build, deps, configs
BREAKING CHANGE
Breaking change MAJOR (X.0.0) Incompatible API changes
Decision Tree:
Does it add new functionality?
└─ Yes → feat (MINOR bump)
└─ No → Does it fix a bug?
└─ Yes → fix (PATCH bump)
└─ No → Is it a breaking change?
└─ Yes → BREAKING CHANGE (MAJOR bump)
└─ No → Choose appropriate type (PATCH bump)
Breaking Changes: A breaking change occurs when:
-
Public API signature changes
-
Required parameters added
-
Return types changed
-
Behavior changes in incompatible way
-
Configuration format changes
-
Removal of features
Examples:
feat: add user authentication system (#123) fix: resolve memory leak in cache manager (#124) docs: update API documentation for v2.0 (#125) refactor: simplify database connection logic (#126) perf: optimize query performance with indexing (#127) BREAKING CHANGE: change authentication API (#128)
Deliverable: Identified change type and version impact
- Calculate Semantic Version
Objective: Determine the next version number.
Semantic Versioning Format: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
Version Increment Rules:
-
MAJOR (X.0.0): Breaking changes, incompatible API
-
MINOR (0.X.0): New features, backward compatible
-
PATCH (0.0.X): Bug fixes, backward compatible
Read current version:
From CHANGELOG.md
head -20 CHANGELOG.md
From pyproject.toml (Python)
grep "^version" pyproject.toml
From package.json (Node.js)
grep '"version"' package.json
From init.py (Python)
grep "version" src/init.py
Calculate next version:
Example calculation
current = "1.2.3" # Current version
For MAJOR bump (breaking change)
next = "2.0.0"
For MINOR bump (new feature)
next = "1.3.0"
For PATCH bump (bug fix)
next = "1.2.4"
Pre-release versions:
1.0.0-alpha.1 # Alpha release 1.0.0-beta.1 # Beta release 1.0.0-rc.1 # Release candidate
Deliverable: Next version number
- Generate CHANGELOG Entry
Objective: Create properly formatted CHANGELOG entry.
Read existing CHANGELOG:
Read CHANGELOG to understand format
Read CHANGELOG.md
CHANGELOG Format (Keep a Changelog):
Changelog
All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is based on Keep a Changelog, and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning.
Unreleased
1.3.0 - 2024-01-15
Added
- User authentication system with JWT tokens (#123)
- Password reset functionality (#125)
- Email verification for new accounts (#126)
Changed
- Updated user profile API to include avatar URL (#127)
- Improved error messages for validation failures (#128)
Fixed
- Memory leak in cache manager (#124)
- Race condition in concurrent requests (#129)
Security
- Implemented rate limiting for login attempts (#130)
- Added CSRF protection for all forms (#131)
Performance
- Optimized database queries with proper indexing (#132)
- Reduced API response time by 40% (#133)
Deprecated
/api/v1/usersendpoint (use/api/v2/users) (#134)
Removed
- Legacy authentication method (#135)
1.2.3 - 2024-01-01
Fixed
- Critical bug in payment processing (#120)
Entry Categories:
Category Use For
Added New features, new capabilities
Changed Changes in existing functionality
Fixed Bug fixes
Deprecated Features marked for removal
Removed Removed features
Security Security improvements/fixes
Performance Performance improvements
Writing Guidelines:
-
Start with verb: "Add", "Fix", "Update", "Remove"
-
Be specific and clear
-
Include issue/PR reference (#number)
-
Write from user perspective
-
Group related changes
-
Highlight breaking changes
Example Entries:
Added
- User authentication system with JWT tokens and refresh token support (#123)
- Supports email/password and OAuth providers
- Includes session management and logout functionality
- Comprehensive test suite with 95% coverage (#125)
Changed
- BREAKING: Authentication API now requires
Authorizationheader instead of query parameter (#126) - Database schema updated to support user roles (#127)
Fixed
- Memory leak in cache manager causing high RAM usage (#124)
- Race condition in concurrent file uploads (#128)
- Incorrect error messages for validation failures (#129)
Security
- Implemented rate limiting (100 req/min per IP) to prevent brute force attacks (#130)
- Added input sanitization to prevent XSS attacks (#131)
- Updated dependencies to fix security vulnerabilities (CVE-2024-1234) (#132)
Performance
- Optimized database queries with proper indexing, reducing query time by 60% (#133)
- Implemented Redis caching for frequently accessed data (#134)
- Reduced API response time from 500ms to 200ms average (#135)
Deliverable: CHANGELOG entry content
- Update CHANGELOG.md
Objective: Insert new entry into CHANGELOG.md.
Process:
-
Read current CHANGELOG.md
-
Find insertion point (after "## Unreleased" or at top)
-
Insert new version entry
-
Update comparison links at bottom
-
Verify formatting
Update CHANGELOG.md:
Changelog
Unreleased
1.3.0 - 2024-01-15 ← NEW ENTRY HERE
Added
- Your new features
Fixed
- Your bug fixes
1.2.3 - 2024-01-01 ← Previous entry
Fixed
- Previous fixes
Unreleased: https://github.com/user/repo/compare/v1.3.0...HEAD ← Update this 1.3.0: https://github.com/user/repo/compare/v1.2.3...v1.3.0 ← Add this 1.2.3: https://github.com/user/repo/compare/v1.2.2...v1.2.3
Use Edit tool:
Read the file first
Read CHANGELOG.md
Then edit to insert new entry
Edit CHANGELOG.md old_string: "## Unreleased\n\n## 1.2.3" new_string: "## Unreleased\n\n## 1.3.0 - 2024-01-15\n\n### Added\n- Feature description (#123)\n\n## 1.2.3"
Deliverable: Updated CHANGELOG.md file
- Update Version Numbers
Objective: Update version in all relevant files.
Files to update:
pyproject.toml (Python)
[project] name = "project-name" version = "1.3.0" # Update this
init.py (Python)
"""Package initialization."""
version = "1.3.0" # Update this author = "Author Name"
package.json (Node.js)
{ "name": "package-name", "version": "1.3.0", // Update this "description": "Package description" }
setup.py (Python legacy)
setup( name="package-name", version="1.3.0", # Update this ... )
Update process:
Find all files with version numbers
Grep pattern="version.=.[0-9]+.[0-9]+.[0-9]+"
Update each file
Edit pyproject.toml old_string: 'version = "1.2.3"' new_string: 'version = "1.3.0"'
Edit src/init.py old_string: 'version = "1.2.3"' new_string: 'version = "1.3.0"'
Deliverable: Version numbers updated in all files
- Verify CHANGELOG Quality
Objective: Ensure CHANGELOG meets quality standards.
Quality Checklist:
-
Version number correct (semantic versioning)
-
Date is today's date (YYYY-MM-DD format)
-
All changes categorized correctly
-
Each entry has issue/PR reference
-
Entries written from user perspective
-
Breaking changes clearly marked
-
Security fixes highlighted
-
No typos or grammar errors
-
Markdown formatted correctly
-
Comparison links updated
-
Consistent with previous entries
Review Examples:
Good Entry:
Added
- User authentication system with JWT and OAuth support (#123)
- Password reset flow with email verification (#125)
✅ Clear, specific, includes references
Bad Entry:
Added
- Authentication stuff
- Password thing
❌ Vague, no references, not informative
Good Breaking Change:
Changed
- BREAKING: Authentication API now requires
Authorization: Bearer <token>header instead of?token=query parameter (#126)- Migration: Update client code to send token in header
- Old method will be removed in v2.0.0
✅ Clearly marked, explains change, provides migration path
Bad Breaking Change:
Changed
- Auth API changed (#126)
❌ Not marked as breaking, no details, no migration help
Deliverable: Quality-verified CHANGELOG entry
CHANGELOG Best Practices
Writing Style
DO:
-
✅ Use clear, descriptive language
-
✅ Write from user perspective
-
✅ Be specific about what changed
-
✅ Include issue/PR references
-
✅ Group related changes
-
✅ Highlight breaking changes
-
✅ Explain security fixes
-
✅ Note performance improvements
DON'T:
-
❌ Use vague descriptions
-
❌ Write from developer perspective only
-
❌ Skip issue references
-
❌ Hide breaking changes
-
❌ Use technical jargon unnecessarily
-
❌ Forget to categorize changes
Version Numbering
DO:
-
✅ Follow semantic versioning strictly
-
✅ Increment MAJOR for breaking changes
-
✅ Increment MINOR for new features
-
✅ Increment PATCH for bug fixes
-
✅ Use pre-release versions (alpha, beta, rc)
DON'T:
-
❌ Use arbitrary version numbers
-
❌ Skip versions
-
❌ Use wrong version format
-
❌ Forget to update all version files
Change Categorization
Added: New features that users can now use
Added
- Dark mode toggle in settings (#123)
- Export data to CSV functionality (#124)
Changed: Modifications to existing features
Changed
- Improved search performance by 50% (#125)
- Updated UI layout for better mobile experience (#126)
Fixed: Bug fixes that users will notice
Fixed
- Crash when opening large files (#127)
- Incorrect calculation in reports (#128)
Deprecated: Features marked for future removal
Deprecated
- Legacy API endpoints (use v2 API) (#129)
- Will be removed in version 3.0.0
Removed: Features that have been deleted
Removed
- Support for Internet Explorer 11 (#130)
Security: Security improvements or fixes
Security
- Fixed XSS vulnerability in comment system (CVE-2024-1234) (#131)
- Added rate limiting to prevent brute force attacks (#132)
Performance: Performance improvements
Performance
- Reduced page load time by 40% through lazy loading (#133)
- Optimized database queries for reports (#134)
Examples
Example 1: New Feature
Scenario: Added user authentication system
Change Type: feat
Version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 (MINOR bump)
CHANGELOG Entry:
1.1.0 - 2024-01-15
Added
- User authentication system with email/password and OAuth support (#123)
- JWT-based authentication with refresh tokens
- Session management with configurable timeout
- Password reset flow with email verification
- User profile management interface (#125)
- Role-based access control (RBAC) system (#126)
Security
- Implemented bcrypt password hashing (#124)
- Added rate limiting for login attempts (5 per minute) (#127)
- CSRF protection for all authenticated endpoints (#128)
Example 2: Bug Fix
Scenario: Fixed memory leak
Change Type: fix
Version: 1.1.0 → 1.1.1 (PATCH bump)
CHANGELOG Entry:
1.1.1 - 2024-01-16
Fixed
- Memory leak in cache manager causing gradual RAM increase (#129)
- Race condition in concurrent file uploads (#130)
- Incorrect timezone handling in date filters (#131)
Example 3: Breaking Change
Scenario: Changed authentication API
Change Type: BREAKING CHANGE
Version: 1.1.1 → 2.0.0 (MAJOR bump)
CHANGELOG Entry:
2.0.0 - 2024-01-20
Changed
-
BREAKING: Authentication API now requires Bearer token in Authorization header (#132)
- Before:
GET /api/resource?token=xxx - After:
GET /api/resourcewithAuthorization: Bearer xxxheader - Migration: Update all API clients to send token in header
- Query parameter authentication will be removed in this version
- Before:
-
BREAKING: User model now requires email verification (#133)
- All existing users marked as verified
- New registrations require email confirmation
- Migration: No action needed for existing users
Added
- Improved token security with short-lived access tokens (#134)
- Automatic token refresh mechanism (#135)
Deprecated
/auth/login-legacyendpoint (use/auth/login) (#136)- Will be removed in v3.0.0
Supporting Resources
References
-
Keep a Changelog
-
Semantic Versioning
-
Conventional Commits
Tools
View git log
git log --oneline --graph --all
View changes since tag
git log v1.0.0..HEAD
View files changed
git diff --stat main..HEAD
Create git tag
git tag -a v1.1.0 -m "Release version 1.1.0" git push origin v1.1.0
Integration with Deployment Flow
Input: Completed feature implementation and documentation Process: Systematic CHANGELOG generation following conventions Output: Updated CHANGELOG.md with proper versioning Next Step: PR creation with CHANGELOG included
Complete Workflow Example
1. Review changes
git log --oneline main..HEAD git diff --stat main..HEAD
2. Determine change type
Decision: New feature → feat → MINOR bump
3. Calculate next version
Current: 1.2.3
Next: 1.3.0 (MINOR bump for new feature)
4. Read current CHANGELOG
Read CHANGELOG.md
5. Generate entry content
Write comprehensive entry with all changes
6. Update CHANGELOG.md
Edit CHANGELOG.md
Insert new version section
7. Update version files
Edit pyproject.toml
Change version to 1.3.0
Edit src/init.py
Change version to "1.3.0"
8. Verify quality
Review entry for completeness and clarity
9. Commit
git add CHANGELOG.md pyproject.toml src/init.py git commit -m "chore: update CHANGELOG for v1.3.0"
Quality Standards
CHANGELOG is complete when:
-
Version number follows semantic versioning
-
All changes categorized correctly
-
Each entry has issue/PR reference
-
Breaking changes clearly marked
-
Security fixes highlighted
-
User perspective maintained
-
Markdown properly formatted
-
Version files updated
-
Comparison links added
-
No typos or errors