nodejs-core

Debugs native module crashes, optimizes V8 performance, configures node-gyp builds, writes N-API/node-addon-api bindings, and diagnoses libuv event loop issues in Node.js. Use when working with C++ addons, native modules, binding.gyp, node-gyp errors, segfaults, memory leaks in native code, V8 optimization/deoptimization, libuv thread pool tuning, N-API or NAN bindings, build system failures, or any Node.js internals below the JavaScript layer.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "nodejs-core" with this command: npx skills add mcollina/skills/mcollina-skills-nodejs-core

When to use

Use this skill when you need deep Node.js internals expertise, including:

  • C++ addon development
  • V8 engine debugging
  • libuv event loop issues
  • Build system problems
  • Compilation failures
  • Performance optimization at the engine level
  • Understanding Node.js core architecture

How to use

Read individual rule files for detailed explanations and code examples:

V8 Engine

libuv

Native Addons

Core Modules Internals

JavaScript Internals

  • rules/primordials.md - Using primordials to prevent prototype pollution (required for lib/internal/)

Build & Contributing

Documentation

  • rules/documentation.md - Updating doc/api/*.md files: structure, link ordering, error docs, code example constraints

Debugging & Profiling

Instructions

MANDATORY: Rebuild before testing

Node.js embeds lib/ JavaScript files into the binary at compile time via js2c. After ANY change to src/ or lib/, you MUST rebuild before running tests. Without a rebuild, tests run against stale code and results are meaningless.

edit src/ or lib/  →  make -j$(nproc)  →  make lint  →  then test

Never skip the rebuild step. Never run ./node test/... after editing without building first.

Before starting work, ask the user about their build configuration (Make vs Ninja, debug vs release, what configure flags they use). Do not assume a specific setup. Most of the time, ./configure has already been run and only make -j$(nproc) is needed to rebuild.

See rules/build-and-test-workflow.md for the full workflow including configure flags, lint targets, and test commands.

Core knowledge domains

Apply deep knowledge of Node.js internals across these domains:

  • Core architecture: Node.js core modules and their C++ implementations, V8 GC and JIT, libuv event loop mechanics, thread pool behavior, startup/module-loading lifecycle
  • Native development: N-API, node-addon-api, and NAN addon development; V8 C++ API handle management; memory safety; native debugging with gdb/lldb
  • Build systems: node-gyp, gyp, ninja, make; cross-platform compilation; linker errors; dependency issues; platform-specific considerations (Windows, macOS, Linux, embedded)
  • Performance & debugging: Event loop profiling, memory leak detection in JS and native code, CPU flame graphs, V8 optimization/deoptimization tracing

Quick-reference debugging commands

V8 optimization tracing:

node --trace-opt --trace-deopt script.js
# Checkpoint: confirm no unexpected deoptimization warnings before proceeding to profiling
node --prof script.js && node --prof-process isolate-*.log > processed.txt

Event loop lag detection:

node --trace-event-categories v8,node,node.async_hooks script.js

Native addon debugging (gdb):

gdb --args node --napi-modules ./build/Release/addon.node
# Inside gdb:
run
bt        # backtrace on crash
# Checkpoint: verify backtrace shows the expected call site before applying a fix

Heap snapshot for memory leaks:

node --inspect script.js   # then open chrome://inspect, take heap snapshot
# Checkpoint: compare two consecutive heap snapshots to confirm leak growth before and after the fix; run valgrind --leak-check=full node addon_test.js to confirm no native leaks remain

Node.js-specific diagnostic decision trees

Segfault / crash in native addon:

  1. Is the crash reproducible with node --napi-modules? → Run gdb, capture bt
  2. Does bt point to a V8 handle scope issue? → Check HandleScope / EscapableHandleScope usage in the addon
  3. Does it point to a libuv callback? → Inspect async handle lifetime and uv_close() sequencing
  4. No clear C++ frame? → Check for JS-side type mismatches passed into the native binding

V8 deoptimization / performance regression:

  1. Run --trace-opt --trace-deopt → identify the deoptimized function and reason (e.g., "not a Smi", "wrong map")
  2. Checkpoint: confirm the same function deoptimizes consistently across runs
  3. Inspect hidden class transitions (--trace-ic) and fix property addition order or type inconsistencies
  4. Re-run --trace-opt to confirm the function is now optimized

Build failure (node-gyp / binding.gyp):

  1. Is it a missing header? → Verify include_dirs in binding.gyp and Node.js header installation
  2. Is it a linker error? → Check libraries and link_settings entries; confirm ABI compatibility
  3. Is it platform-specific? → Consult rules/build-system.md for Windows/macOS/Linux differences

Always consider both JavaScript-level and native-level causes, explain performance implications and trade-offs, and indicate the stability status of any experimental features discussed. Code examples should demonstrate Node.js internals patterns and be production-ready, accounting for edge cases typical developers might miss.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

typescript-magician

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

fastify-best-practices

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

node

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

documentation

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review