acceptance-criteria-authoring

Acceptance Criteria Authoring

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "acceptance-criteria-authoring" with this command: npx skills add melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/melodic-software-claude-code-plugins-acceptance-criteria-authoring

Acceptance Criteria Authoring

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Acceptance Criteria Authoring tasks - Working on write clear, testable acceptance criteria in given-when-then format following invest principles and bdd best practices

  • Planning or design - Need guidance on Acceptance Criteria Authoring approaches

  • Best practices - Want to follow established patterns and standards

Overview

Acceptance criteria define the conditions that must be met for a user story to be considered complete. Well-written acceptance criteria enable clear communication between stakeholders and drive automated acceptance tests.

Given-When-Then Format

Given [precondition/context] When [action/event] Then [expected outcome]

Components

Component Purpose Example

Given Set up initial context "Given a logged-in premium user"

When Trigger action/event "When they click 'Download Report'"

Then Assert expected outcome "Then a PDF report downloads"

And Chain multiple conditions "And the report includes all orders"

But Negative assertion "But archived orders are excluded"

INVEST Principles for User Stories

Letter Principle Description

I Independent Can be developed in any order

N Negotiable Details can be discussed

V Valuable Delivers user/business value

E Estimable Can be sized by team

S Small Fits in one sprint

T Testable Has clear acceptance criteria

Acceptance Criteria Best Practices

Do ✅

  • Use business language, not technical jargon

  • Be specific and measurable

  • Include happy path and edge cases

  • Keep scenarios focused and atomic

  • Write from user perspective

  • Include error scenarios

Don't ❌

  • Include implementation details

  • Make criteria too broad

  • Use ambiguous terms ("fast", "user-friendly")

  • Combine multiple behaviors in one scenario

  • Skip error handling scenarios

Example: E-commerce Checkout

User Story

As a registered customer I want to checkout with a saved payment method So that I can complete purchases quickly

Acceptance Criteria

Feature: Checkout with Saved Payment

Background: Given I am logged in as a registered customer And I have a saved Visa card ending in 4242

Scenario: Successful checkout with saved card Given I have items in my cart totaling $50.00 When I proceed to checkout And I select my saved Visa card And I click "Place Order" Then I see an order confirmation page And I receive a confirmation email And my card is charged $50.00

Scenario: Checkout with expired saved card Given my saved card has expired And I have items in my cart When I proceed to checkout And I select my expired card Then I see a message "This card has expired" And I am prompted to update the card or add a new one

Scenario: Checkout when card is declined Given I have items in my cart When I proceed to checkout And I select my saved card And I click "Place Order" And the payment is declined Then I see a message "Payment declined. Please try another payment method." And the order is not created And my cart is preserved

Scenario: Checkout with insufficient inventory Given I have 3 units of "Widget X" in my cart And only 2 units are in stock When I proceed to checkout Then I see a message "Widget X: Only 2 available" And I am prompted to update quantity

Scenario Patterns

Happy Path

Scenario: User successfully [action] Given [valid preconditions] When [correct action] Then [expected positive outcome]

Error Handling

Scenario: [Action] fails due to [reason] Given [preconditions that lead to failure] When [action that will fail] Then [appropriate error message] And [system state is preserved/recovered]

Edge Cases

Scenario: [Action] with boundary condition Given [boundary condition setup] When [action at boundary] Then [expected behavior at boundary]

Security

Scenario: Unauthorized user attempts [action] Given I am not logged in When I try to access [protected resource] Then I am redirected to login page And I see "Please log in to continue"

Scenario Outlines

Use for testing multiple data variations:

Scenario Outline: Discount applied based on order value Given I have items in my cart totaling <order_total> When I proceed to checkout Then I see a discount of <discount> And my final total is <final_total>

Examples: | order_total | discount | final_total | | $50.00 | $0.00 | $50.00 | | $100.00 | $5.00 | $95.00 | | $200.00 | $20.00 | $180.00 |

.NET SpecFlow Example

[Binding] public class CheckoutSteps { private readonly CheckoutContext _context;

public CheckoutSteps(CheckoutContext context)
{
    _context = context;
}

[Given(@"I am logged in as a registered customer")]
public void GivenIAmLoggedInAsARegisteredCustomer()
{
    _context.Customer = TestCustomers.CreateRegistered();
    _context.Session = _context.AuthService.Login(_context.Customer);
}

[Given(@"I have items in my cart totaling \$(.*)")]
public void GivenIHaveItemsInMyCartTotaling(decimal total)
{
    _context.Cart = TestCart.WithTotal(total);
}

[When(@"I click ""(.*)""")]
public void WhenIClick(string button)
{
    _context.Result = _context.CheckoutPage.Click(button);
}

[Then(@"I see an order confirmation page")]
public void ThenISeeAnOrderConfirmationPage()
{
    Assert.IsType&#x3C;OrderConfirmationPage>(_context.Result);
}

[Then(@"I receive a confirmation email")]
public void ThenIReceiveAConfirmationEmail()
{
    var emails = _context.EmailService.GetEmailsFor(_context.Customer.Email);
    Assert.Contains(emails, e => e.Subject.Contains("Order Confirmation"));
}

}

Coverage Checklist

For each user story, ensure coverage of:

  • Happy path: Main success scenario

  • Validation errors: Invalid input handling

  • Business rule violations: Domain constraint failures

  • Authorization failures: Access control

  • External service failures: Third-party integration errors

  • Boundary conditions: Min/max values, empty states

  • Concurrency: Multiple users, race conditions

  • State transitions: Valid and invalid state changes

Acceptance Criteria Template

User Story

As a [role] I want to [action] So that [benefit]

Acceptance Criteria

Scenario 1: [Happy path description]

Given [precondition] When [action] Then [expected outcome]

Scenario 2: [Error case description]

Given [error-inducing condition] When [action] Then [error handling behavior]

Scenario 3: [Edge case description]

Given [edge condition] When [action] Then [boundary behavior]

Out of Scope

  • [Explicitly excluded scenarios]

Notes

  • [Implementation hints or business context]

Integration Points

Inputs from:

  • Requirements → Story context

  • jtbd-analysis skill → Job steps

  • test-case-design skill → Test techniques

Outputs to:

  • SpecFlow/Cucumber automation

  • test-strategy-planning skill → Acceptance test scope

  • Definition of Done

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

design-thinking

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

plantuml-syntax

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

system-prompt-engineering

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

swot-pestle-analysis

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review