Resources
scripts/ validate-gpa-compliance.sh references/ examples-and-checklists.md
Gather-Plan-Apply Protocol (GPA Workflow)
The GPA loop enforces a one-call-per-tool-type-per-phase workflow that eliminates token waste from excessive tool calls. This is NOT a suggestion — it is a MANDATORY execution pattern for all GoodVibes agents.
THE EXACT WORKFLOW
-
LOAD SKILLS (once, before any GPA cycle)
- Call get_skill_content for role-relevant skills
- This is NOT part of the GPA cycle itself
-
G — GATHER (1-2 tool calls)
- Check .goodvibes/memory/ files FIRST (failures, patterns, decisions)
- Single
discovercall with ALL queries batched inside - Multiple query types (glob, grep, symbols, structural) in one call
- Can search file content via grep/symbols queries
- Batch any file reads that need full content alongside discover
- Output: files_only or locations (minimal verbosity)
-
P — PLAN (0 tool calls, cognitive only)
- Agent thinks about what it learned from GATHER
- Plans which files to create/write/edit
- Plans which commands to run for validation
- Identifies ALL batch opportunities — same-type ops go in one call
- Plans the EXACT apply call structure
-
A — APPLY (1-2 tool calls)
- Writes and edits batched into one precision_write or precision_edit call
- Validation commands batched into one precision_exec call
- Key: one call per tool type, everything batched inside it
-
LOOP — Back to G if:
- Results didn't match expectations
- Scope changed
- Validation failed
CALL BUDGET PER CYCLE
Phase Tool Calls Type Purpose
G (Gather) 1-2 discover
- optional precision_read
All discovery + memory reads
P (Plan) 0 Cognitive Plan apply operations
A (Apply) 1-2 precision_write /precision_edit
- precision_exec
All writes/edits + validation
TOTAL 2-4
Core rule: One call per tool type per phase. Never make two precision_read calls in the same phase — batch both files into the one call.
Note on sequential calls: Sequential calls are acceptable when operations depend on each other (e.g., write then verify). Always prefer true batching via internal precision tool arrays (files array, edits array, commands array).
KEY RULES (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
-
discover batches ALL discovery queries into 1 call — NEVER use separate precision_glob , precision_grep for discovery
-
Plan steps produce ZERO tool calls — they are cognitive (agent thinks in text)
-
One call per tool type per phase — if you need 3 files read, batch them in 1 precision_read call
-
APPLY output = 1-2 calls — precision_write/edit for files, precision_exec for commands
-
ToolSearch is NOT part of GPA — load tools once at start, don't search mid-cycle
-
Check memory FIRST — always read .goodvibes/memory/ before implementing
Phase 1: GATHER (1-2 calls)
Initial Setup: Check Memory
Before discovering files, check what's already known. Batch memory reads with your discover call or as a separate read:
GOOD: Memory reads batched with file content reads
precision_read: files: - path: ".goodvibes/memory/failures.json" - path: ".goodvibes/memory/patterns.json" - path: ".goodvibes/memory/decisions.json" verbosity: minimal
The discover Tool
The discover tool runs multiple grep/glob/symbols/structural queries in parallel, returning results keyed by query ID. This is your primary discovery mechanism.
Pattern: Batch ALL discovery queries
GOOD: 1 discover call with everything
discover: queries: - id: existing_files type: glob patterns: ["src/features/auth//*.ts"] - id: existing_patterns type: grep pattern: "export (function|const|class)" glob: "src/features//*.ts" - id: exported_hooks type: symbols query: "use" kinds: ["function"] - id: console_logs type: structural structural_pattern: "console.log($$$ARGS)" verbosity: files_only
Query types:
-
glob - Find files by path patterns
-
grep - Find files containing patterns
-
symbols - Find exported functions/types/classes
-
structural - Find AST patterns (e.g., function calls)
Output modes:
-
count_only
-
Just counts (scope estimation)
-
files_only
-
File paths only (building target lists) ← USE THIS
-
locations
-
File paths + line numbers (when you need exact locations)
Reading Full File Contents
For reading full file contents, use precision_read in the GATHER phase, batched with memory reads or as a second call if discover results are needed first.
[BAD] vs [GOOD] Gather Patterns
[BAD] — Sequential discovery queries (multiple tool calls)
BAD: 4 separate tool calls for discovery
precision_glob: patterns: ["src/**/*.ts"]
precision_grep: queries: - id: exports pattern: "export function"
precision_read: files: - path: ".goodvibes/memory/failures.json"
precision_grep: queries: - id: imports pattern: "import.*from"
[GOOD] — Single discover call + batched memory reads (2 tool calls)
GOOD: 1 discover call with all queries
discover: queries: - id: files type: glob patterns: ["src//*.ts"] - id: exports type: grep pattern: "export function" glob: "src//*.ts" - id: imports type: grep pattern: "import.from" glob: "src/**/.ts" verbosity: files_only
GOOD: Memory reads in one batched call
precision_read: files: - path: ".goodvibes/memory/failures.json" - path: ".goodvibes/memory/patterns.json" - path: ".goodvibes/memory/decisions.json" verbosity: minimal
Phase 2: PLAN (0 calls, cognitive only)
Purpose
Planning is cognitive work, not tool calls. You think in text about:
-
Which files to create/write
-
Which files to edit (with exact find/replace)
-
Which commands to run for validation
-
ALL batch opportunities — same-type ops must be batched
Output: A written plan with NO tool calls
Plan Structure
Plan:
-
Create the following files:
- src/features/auth/types.ts — User interface
- src/features/auth/hooks.ts — useAuth hook
- src/features/auth/index.ts — barrel export
-
Edit the following files:
- src/app/layout.tsx — wrap App with AuthProvider
-
Validate:
- npm run typecheck (expect exit 0)
- npm run lint (expect exit 0)
-
Batch plan:
- Call 1 (Apply): precision_write with 3 files + precision_edit with 1 edit
- Call 2 (Apply): precision_exec with 2 commands
[BAD] vs [GOOD] Planning
[BAD] — Vague plan that leads to sequential calls
Plan:
- Create some files
- Maybe edit layout
- Run typecheck
This leads to:
precision_write: ... # 1st call precision_write: ... # 2nd call! (should be batched) precision_edit: ... # 3rd call! (could combine with above pattern)
[GOOD] — Specific plan with exact batch structure
Plan:
-
Write 3 files in 1 precision_write call:
- src/features/auth/types.ts (symbols)
- src/features/auth/hooks.ts (content)
- src/features/auth/index.ts (content)
-
Edit 1 file in 1 precision_edit call:
- src/app/layout.tsx — wrap with AuthProvider
-
Validate in 1 precision_exec call:
- npm run typecheck
- npm run lint
Phase 3: APPLY (1-2 calls)
Pattern: Batch All Writes/Edits
Single precision_write with multiple files:
precision_write: files: - path: "src/features/auth/types.ts" content: | export interface User { id: string; email: string; } - path: "src/features/auth/hooks.ts" content: | import type { User } from './types'; export function useAuth(): User | null { /.../ } - path: "src/features/auth/index.ts" content: | export * from './types'; export * from './hooks'; verbosity: count_only
OR single precision_edit with multiple edits:
precision_edit:
edits:
- path: "src/app/layout.tsx"
find: "<App />"
replace: "<AuthProvider><App /></AuthProvider>"
- path: "src/middleware.ts"
find: "export const config = {}"
replace: "export const config = { matcher: ['/dashboard/:path*'] }"
- path: "src/lib/api.ts"
find: "headers: {}"
replace: "headers: { Authorization: Bearer ${token} }"
verbosity: minimal
Validation via precision_exec (second Apply call):
precision_exec: commands: - cmd: "npm run typecheck" expect: exit_code: 0 - cmd: "npm run lint" expect: exit_code: 0 verbosity: minimal
[BAD] vs [GOOD] Apply Batching
[BAD] — 3 separate precision_write calls
precision_write: files: - path: "file1.ts" content: "..."
precision_write: # Second call! files: - path: "file2.ts" content: "..."
precision_write: # Third call! files: - path: "file3.ts" content: "..."
[GOOD] — 1 precision_write call with 3 files
precision_write: files: - path: "file1.ts" content: "..." - path: "file2.ts" content: "..." - path: "file3.ts" content: "..." verbosity: count_only
Phase 4: LOOP (When to Return to Gather)
Loop Triggers
-
Results don't match expectations — Typecheck fails, tests fail, unexpected behavior
-
Scope changed — Discovery revealed different situation than expected
-
New information — Task requirements clarified during execution
Loop Pattern
Initial GPA cycle
discover: ... # Gather call 1 precision_read: ... # Gather call 2 (memory + key files) precision_write: ... # Apply call 1 precision_exec: ... # Apply call 2 — FAILS typecheck
LOOP: Start new GPA cycle with refined discovery
discover: # Gather call 1 (new cycle) queries: - id: find_missing_import type: grep pattern: "export.User" glob: "src/**/.ts" verbosity: locations # Need exact location
precision_edit: ... # Apply call 1 (new cycle) - fix the issue precision_exec: ... # Apply call 2 (new cycle) - re-validate
Complete Example: Implementing Auth Feature
Cycle 1: Initial Implementation
Step 1 — GATHER (2 calls)
Call 1: Check memory
precision_read: files: - path: ".goodvibes/memory/failures.json" - path: ".goodvibes/memory/decisions.json" verbosity: minimal
Call 2: Discover landscape
discover: queries: - id: existing_auth type: glob patterns: ["src/features/auth//*.ts", "src//auth*.ts"] - id: auth_patterns type: grep pattern: "(useAuth|getSession|AuthProvider)" glob: "src/**/*.{ts,tsx}" - id: user_types type: symbols query: "User" kinds: ["interface", "type"] verbosity: files_only
Step 2 — PLAN (0 calls, cognitive)
Gather results:
- No memory failures for auth
- No existing auth files
- No auth patterns in use
- User type exists in src/types/user.ts
Plan: Apply Call 1 (precision_write): Create 3 auth files Apply Call 2 (precision_exec): typecheck + lint
Step 3 — APPLY (2 calls)
Call 1: Create files
precision_write: files: - path: "src/features/auth/provider.tsx" content: | import { ClerkProvider } from '@clerk/nextjs'; export function AuthProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { return <ClerkProvider>{children}</ClerkProvider>; } - path: "src/features/auth/hooks.ts" content: | import { useUser } from '@clerk/nextjs'; import type { User } from '@/types/user'; export function useAuth(): User | null { const { user } = useUser(); if (!user) return null; return { id: user.id, email: user.emailAddresses[0].emailAddress, name: user.fullName }; } - path: "src/features/auth/index.ts" content: | export { AuthProvider } from './provider'; export { useAuth } from './hooks'; verbosity: count_only
Call 2: Validate
precision_exec: commands: - cmd: "npm run typecheck" expect: exit_code: 0 - cmd: "npm run lint" expect: exit_code: 0 verbosity: minimal
Result: typecheck FAILS — missing @clerk/nextjs
Total calls in Cycle 1: 4 (precision_read + discover + precision_write + precision_exec)
Cycle 2: Fix Missing Dependency
Step 1 — GATHER (1 call)
discover: queries: - id: package_json type: glob patterns: ["package.json"] - id: clerk_usage type: grep pattern: "@clerk/nextjs" glob: "src/**/*.{ts,tsx}" verbosity: files_only
Step 2 — PLAN (0 calls, cognitive)
Discovery: @clerk/nextjs not in package.json Plan: Apply Call 1 (precision_exec): npm install @clerk/nextjs, then typecheck
Step 3 — APPLY (1 call)
precision_exec: commands: - cmd: "npm install @clerk/nextjs" - cmd: "npm run typecheck" expect: exit_code: 0 verbosity: minimal
Result: PASSES
Total calls in Cycle 2: 2 (discover + precision_exec)
Common Violations and Fixes
Violation Tool Calls Fix
Sequential precision_read calls 5+ Batch all files into 1 precision_read call
Sequential precision_write calls 5+ Batch all files into 1 precision_write call
Using precision_glob + precision_grep separately 2+ Use 1 discover call with both query types
Reading outline, then content 2 Read content once if you'll need it
Planning via tool calls 1+ Plan in text (cognitive work = 0 calls)
Memory reads skipped
Always check .goodvibes/memory/ in Gather phase
Enforcement
If you find yourself making the same tool type twice in a phase, you are violating the protocol. Stop and restructure:
-
Identify which calls are discovery → batch into 1 discover call
-
Identify which calls are memory/file reads → batch into 1 precision_read call
-
Identify which calls are writes/edits → batch into same-type calls (writes together, edits together)
-
Ensure planning happens in text, not via tools
Target: one call per tool type per phase.
Summary
- G (Gather): check memory + discover
- optional precision_read for key files
-
P (Plan): 0 calls (cognitive)
-
A (Apply): precision_write /precision_edit
- precision_exec for validation
- LOOP: Start new cycle if needed
Rule: One call per tool type per phase. Maximize batching within each call.
Make this your default mode of operation.