/next-actions — Find Next Actions from KB Database
CRITICAL EXECUTION RULE: Do NOT spawn sub-agents (Task tool) for this skill. Call all MCP tools directly in the main conversation using the mcp__knowledge-base__ prefix. Sub-agents do not have reliable access to the knowledge-base MCP server and will waste time exploring the filesystem instead of making tool calls.
Usage
/next-actions [N] [--tag=TAG] [--plan-status=STATUS]
Examples:
Show the next 5 actionable items (default)
/next-actions
Show the next 3 actionable items
/next-actions 3
Show the next 10 actionable items
/next-actions 10
Show next actions for plans that improve testing
/next-actions --tag=testing
Show next actions for lego-ui plans only
/next-actions --tag=lego-ui
Show next actions from in-progress plans
/next-actions --plan-status=in-progress
Combine: next 3 elaboration items from in-progress plans
/next-actions 3 --tag=elaboration --plan-status=in-progress
What It Does
Queries the KB database (single source of truth) for stories that need action, resolves dependencies at query time, and maps each story's state to the appropriate workflow command.
Inflight work always appears before new work. Stories being actively worked by an agent (active worktree in DB) are excluded entirely.
Parameters
Parameter Required Description
N
No Number of items to return (default: 5)
--tag=TAG
No Filter to stories linked to plans with this tag (e.g., testing , lego-ui , elaboration , development , agent-tooling )
--plan-status=STATUS
No Filter to stories linked to plans with this status (draft , accepted , stories-created , in-progress , implemented , superseded , archived )
Priority Order (non-negotiable)
Rank Category States Rationale
1 Needs QA ready_for_qa , in_qa
Closest to done — unblock the pipeline first
2 Needs Fix failed_qa , failed_code_review , in_review
Something was rejected — fix before starting new work
3 Needs Code Review ready_for_review
Dev complete, waiting on review
4 Needs Dev ready , in_progress (no active worktree) Elaborated and ready to implement
5 Needs Elaboration backlog (story file exists) Story seed exists, not yet elaborated
6 Needs Story Creation backlog (no story file) Only a seed — story not yet generated
Within each rank, sort by priority: critical
high medium low .
Execution Steps
Step 1 — Get Active Worktrees
Call mcp__knowledge-base__worktree_list_active directly (no sub-agent):
mcp__knowledge-base__worktree_list_active({}) → extract list of story_ids where status = 'active' → call these ACTIVE_IDS
If the tool is unavailable, set ACTIVE_IDS = [].
Step 2 — Query the KB Database
Call mcp__knowledge-base__kb_list_stories directly. If --tag or --plan-status were provided, pass them as plan_tag and plan_status :
mcp__knowledge-base__kb_list_stories({ epic: "platform", states: ["ready_for_qa", "in_qa", "failed_qa", "failed_code_review", "in_review", "ready_for_review", "ready", "in_progress", "backlog", "completed", "cancelled", "deferred"], limit: N, ...(TAG ? { plan_tag: TAG } : {}), ...(PLAN_STATUS ? { plan_status: PLAN_STATUS } : {}) })
If the result contains 0 stories, go to Step 6 (Fallback).
Step 3 — Collect N Candidates via mcp__knowledge-base__kb_get_next_story
Call mcp__knowledge-base__kb_get_next_story up to N times directly (no sub-agent), accumulating excluded IDs. Pass plan_tag and plan_status if provided:
First call — exclude all active worktrees
mcp__knowledge-base__kb_get_next_story({ epic: "platform", include_backlog: true, exclude_story_ids: ACTIVE_IDS, ...(TAG ? { plan_tag: TAG } : {}), ...(PLAN_STATUS ? { plan_status: PLAN_STATUS } : {}) }) → returns STORY_A
Second call — exclude active + first result
mcp__knowledge-base__kb_get_next_story({ epic: "platform", include_backlog: true, exclude_story_ids: [...ACTIVE_IDS, "STORY_A"], ...(TAG ? { plan_tag: TAG } : {}), ...(PLAN_STATUS ? { plan_status: PLAN_STATUS } : {}) }) → returns STORY_B
... repeat until N items or no more candidates
Stop when mcp__knowledge-base__kb_get_next_story returns story: null or you have N items.
Step 4 — Re-sort by Priority Rank
After collecting candidates, re-sort by the rank table above (QA > Fix > Review > Dev > Elaboration > Creation), then by story priority within each rank:
priority order: critical (1) > high (2) > medium (3) > low (4) > null (5)
Important: kb_get_next_story only returns stories in ready or backlog state. Stories in other actionable states (ready_for_qa , failed_qa , failed_code_review , in_review , ready_for_review ) must be pulled from the Step 2 kb_list_stories result and added to the candidates list before sorting.
To build the full candidate set:
-
From the kb_list_stories result, take all stories in inflight states: ready_for_qa , in_qa , failed_qa , failed_code_review , in_review , ready_for_review
-
From kb_get_next_story calls, collect up to N stories in ready or backlog state
-
Remove any ACTIVE_IDS from the combined list
-
Sort the combined list by rank, then by priority within rank
-
Take the top N
Step 5 — Map State to Command
For each story in the sorted list, determine the command based on its state field:
State Category Command Template
ready_for_qa
Needs QA /qa-verify-story {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
in_qa
Needs QA /qa-verify-story {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
in_review
Needs Fix /dev-fix-story {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
failed_code_review
Needs Fix /dev-fix-story {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
failed_qa
Needs Fix /dev-fix-story {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
ready_for_review
Needs Code Review /dev-code-review {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
ready or in_progress
Needs Dev /dev-implement-story {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
backlog (elaborated) Needs Elaboration /elab-story {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
backlog (no story) Needs Story Creation /pm-story generate {FEATURE_DIR} {STORY_ID}
Distinguishing elaborated vs. not: A backlog story is "elaborated" if its story_dir exists on disk and contains a story.yaml file. If the directory or file doesn't exist, it needs story creation.
Feature directory derivation from story ID prefix:
Prefix Feature Directory
WINT
plans/future/platform/wint
KBAR
plans/future/platform/kb-artifact-migration
AUDT
plans/future/platform/code-audit
TELE
plans/future/platform/telemetry
INFR
plans/future/platform/infrastructure
LNGG
plans/future/platform/langgraph-update
MODL
plans/future/platform/model-experimentation
LERN
plans/future/platform/learning-loop
SDLC
plans/future/platform/sdlc-agents
AUTO
plans/future/platform/autonomous-dev
WKFL
plans/future/platform/workflow-learning
If the story record has a story_dir field, use that to derive the feature directory (strip the story ID segment). If the prefix is not found in the table above, use plans/future/platform as the feature directory.
Step 6 — Fallback (DB Empty)
If Step 2 returned 0 stories, the database likely needs seeding.
-
Read plans/future/platform/WORK-ORDER-BY-BATCH.md directly
-
Parse the markdown tables to find unblocked stories
-
Output the results with a prominent warning:
⚠️ KB database has no stories — falling back to WORK-ORDER-BY-BATCH.md Run a DB seed to populate stories for reliable dependency resolution.
[results from markdown parsing]
When parsing the markdown fallback:
-
Stories with [x] checkbox or ✅ status are complete — skip them
-
Stories with ❌ or strikethrough are cancelled — skip them
-
Stories with 🔧 are being worked — skip them
-
For remaining stories, check if all (#NN) dependency references point to completed rows
-
Use the same state-to-command mapping, inferring state from status emoji:
-
🔍 → ready_for_qa (Needs QA)
-
⏸️ → in_review (Needs Fix — review findings exist)
-
📋 → ready_for_review (Needs Code Review)
-
🚧 → in_progress (Needs Dev)
-
⏳ → ready (Needs Dev)
-
📝 / 🆕 → backlog (Needs Elaboration or Story Creation)
-
⚪ → backlog (Needs Elaboration or Story Creation)
-
Apply the same stage-first sorting (QA > Fix > Review > Dev > Elaboration > Creation)
Step 7 — Output
Format the results as a table. If filters were applied, show them in the header. Inflight work appears first (per the rank order):
Next actions (N items): Filters: tag=testing, plan-status=in-progress ← only if filters were used
| # | Category | Story | Priority | Command |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Needs QA | WKFL-002 — Story title | high | /qa-verify-story plans/future/platform/workflow-learning WKFL-002 |
| 2 | Needs Fix | WINT-0030 — Story title | high | /dev-fix-story plans/future/platform/wint WINT-0030 |
| 3 | Needs Code Review | WKFL-007 — Story title | medium | /dev-code-review plans/future/platform/workflow-learning WKFL-007 |
| 4 | Needs Dev | WKFL-010 — Story title | medium | /dev-implement-story plans/future/platform/workflow-learning WKFL-010 |
| 5 | Needs Elaboration | WKFL-008 — Story title | low | /elab-story plans/future/platform/workflow-learning WKFL-008 |
If stories were excluded due to active worktrees, note them below the table:
Excluded (active worktree): WKFL-006, WINT-0100
If no unblocked stories exist:
No actionable stories found.
All remaining stories are blocked by unresolved dependencies.
Use kb_list_stories to inspect blocked stories.
Edge Cases
Scenario Behavior
DB returns 0 stories Fall back to WORK-ORDER-BY-BATCH.md with warning
All stories blocked Report "no actionable stories" with count of blocked
Story has no feature prefix match Use plans/future/platform as feature dir
N > available unblocked stories Return all available (less than N)
MCP tools unavailable Fall back to WORK-ORDER-BY-BATCH.md with warning
mcp__knowledge-base__worktree_list_active fails Treat ACTIVE_IDS as empty, proceed without exclusion
Story in in_progress with no active worktree Treat as Needs Dev (rank 4)