PostgreSQL Hypertable Candidate Analysis
Identify tables that would benefit from TimescaleDB hypertable conversion. After identification, use the companion "migrate-postgres-tables-to-hypertables" skill for configuration and migration.
TimescaleDB Benefits
Performance gains: 90%+ compression, fast time-based queries, improved insert performance, efficient aggregations, continuous aggregates for materialization (dashboards, reports, analytics), automatic data management (retention, compression).
Best for insert-heavy patterns:
-
Time-series data (sensors, metrics, monitoring)
-
Event logs (user events, audit trails, application logs)
-
Transaction records (orders, payments, financial)
-
Sequential data (auto-incrementing IDs with timestamps)
-
Append-only datasets (immutable records, historical)
Requirements: Large volumes (1M+ rows), time-based queries, infrequent updates
Step 1: Database Schema Analysis
Option A: From Database Connection
Table statistics and size
-- Get all tables with row counts and insert/update patterns WITH table_stats AS ( SELECT schemaname, tablename, n_tup_ins as total_inserts, n_tup_upd as total_updates, n_tup_del as total_deletes, n_live_tup as live_rows, n_dead_tup as dead_rows FROM pg_stat_user_tables ), table_sizes AS ( SELECT schemaname, tablename, pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(schemaname||'.'||tablename)) as total_size, pg_total_relation_size(schemaname||'.'||tablename) as total_size_bytes FROM pg_tables WHERE schemaname NOT IN ('information_schema', 'pg_catalog') ) SELECT ts.schemaname, ts.tablename, ts.live_rows, tsize.total_size, tsize.total_size_bytes, ts.total_inserts, ts.total_updates, ts.total_deletes, ROUND(CASE WHEN ts.live_rows > 0 THEN (ts.total_inserts::float / ts.live_rows) * 100 ELSE 0 END, 2) as insert_ratio_pct FROM table_stats ts JOIN table_sizes tsize ON ts.schemaname = tsize.schemaname AND ts.tablename = tsize.tablename ORDER BY tsize.total_size_bytes DESC;
Look for:
-
mostly insert-heavy patterns (less updates/deletes)
-
big tables (1M+ rows or 100MB+)
Index patterns
-- Identify common query dimensions SELECT schemaname, tablename, indexname, indexdef FROM pg_indexes WHERE schemaname NOT IN ('information_schema', 'pg_catalog') ORDER BY tablename, indexname;
Look for:
-
Multiple indexes with timestamp/created_at columns → time-based queries
-
Composite (entity_id, timestamp) indexes → good candidates
-
Time-only indexes → time range filtering common
Query patterns (if pg_stat_statements available)
-- Check availability SELECT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM pg_extension WHERE extname = 'pg_stat_statements');
-- Analyze expensive queries for candidate tables SELECT query, calls, mean_exec_time, total_exec_time FROM pg_stat_statements WHERE query ILIKE '%your_table_name%' ORDER BY total_exec_time DESC LIMIT 20;
✅ Good patterns: Time-based WHERE, entity filtering combined with time-based qualifiers, GROUP BY time_bucket, range queries over time ❌ Poor patterns: Non-time lookups with no time-based qualifiers in same query (WHERE email = ...)
Constraints
-- Check migration compatibility SELECT conname, contype, pg_get_constraintdef(oid) as definition FROM pg_constraint WHERE conrelid = 'your_table_name'::regclass;
Compatibility:
-
Primary keys (p): Must include partition column or ask user if can be modified
-
Foreign keys (f): Plain→Hypertable and Hypertable→Plain OK, Hypertable→Hypertable NOT supported
-
Unique constraints (u): Must include partition column or ask user if can be modified
-
Check constraints (c): Usually OK
Option B: From Code Analysis
✅ GOOD Patterns
Append-only logging
INSERT INTO events (user_id, event_time, data) VALUES (...);
Time-series collection
INSERT INTO metrics (device_id, timestamp, value) VALUES (...);
Time-based queries
SELECT * FROM metrics WHERE timestamp >= NOW() - INTERVAL '24 hours';
Time aggregations
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('day', timestamp), COUNT(*) GROUP BY 1;
❌ POOR Patterns
Frequent updates to historical records
UPDATE users SET email = ..., updated_at = NOW() WHERE id = ...;
Non-time lookups
SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ...;
Small reference tables
SELECT * FROM countries ORDER BY name;
Schema Indicators
✅ GOOD:
-
Has timestamp/timestamptz column
-
Multiple indexes with timestamp-based columns
-
Composite (entity_id, timestamp) indexes
❌ POOR:
-
Mostly indexes with non-time-based columns (on columns like email, name, status, etc.)
-
Columns that you expect to be updated over time (updated_at, updated_by, status, etc.)
-
Unique constraints on non-time fields
-
Frequent updated_at modifications
-
Small static tables
Special Case: ID-Based Tables
Sequential ID tables can be candidates if:
-
Insert-mostly pattern / updates are either infrequent or only on recent records.
-
If updates do happen, they occur on recent records (such as an order status being updated orderered->processing->delivered. Note once an order is delivered, it is unlikely to be updated again.)
-
IDs correlate with time (as is the case for serial/auto-incrementing IDs/GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY)
-
ID is the primary query dimension
-
Recent data accessed more often (frequently the case in ecommerce, finance, etc.)
-
Time-based reporting common (e.g. monthly, daily summaries/analytics)
CREATE TABLE orders ( id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY, -- Can partition by ID user_id BIGINT, created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW() -- For sparse indexes );
Note: For ID-based tables where there is also a time column (created_at, ordered_at, etc.), you can partition by ID and use sparse indexes on the time column. See the migrate-postgres-tables-to-hypertables skill for details.
Step 2: Candidacy Scoring (8+ points = good candidate)
Time-Series Characteristics (5+ points needed)
-
Has timestamp/timestamptz column: 3 points
-
Data inserted chronologically: 2 points
-
Queries filter by time: 2 points
-
Time aggregations common: 2 points
Scale & Performance (3+ points recommended)
-
Large table (1M+ rows or 100MB+): 2 points
-
High insert volume: 1 point
-
Infrequent updates to historical: 1 point
-
Range queries common: 1 point
-
Aggregation queries: 2 points
Data Patterns (bonus)
-
Contains entity ID for segmentation (device_id, user_id, product_id, symbol, etc.): 1 point
-
Numeric measurements: 1 point
-
Log/event structure: 1 point
Common Patterns
✅ GOOD Candidates
✅ Event/Log Tables (user_events, audit_logs)
CREATE TABLE user_events ( id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY, user_id BIGINT, event_type TEXT, event_time TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW(), metadata JSONB ); -- Partition by id, segment by user_id, enable minmax sparse_index on event_time
✅ Sensor/IoT Data (sensor_readings, telemetry)
CREATE TABLE sensor_readings ( device_id TEXT, timestamp TIMESTAMPTZ, temperature DOUBLE PRECISION, humidity DOUBLE PRECISION ); -- Partition by timestamp, segment by device_id, minmax sparse indexes on temperature and humidity
✅ Financial/Trading (stock_prices, transactions)
CREATE TABLE stock_prices ( symbol VARCHAR(10), price_time TIMESTAMPTZ, open_price DECIMAL, close_price DECIMAL, volume BIGINT ); -- Partition by price_time, segment by symbol, minmax sparse indexes on open_price and close_price and volume
✅ System Metrics (monitoring_data)
CREATE TABLE system_metrics ( hostname TEXT, metric_time TIMESTAMPTZ, cpu_usage DOUBLE PRECISION, memory_usage BIGINT ); -- Partition by metric_time, segment by hostname, minmax sparse indexes on cpu_usage and memory_usage
❌ POOR Candidates
❌ Reference Tables (countries, categories)
CREATE TABLE countries ( id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, name VARCHAR(100), code CHAR(2) ); -- Static data, no time component
❌ User Profiles (users, accounts)
CREATE TABLE users ( id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY, email VARCHAR(255), created_at TIMESTAMPTZ, updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ ); -- Accessed by ID, frequently updated, has timestamp but it's not the primary query dimension (the primary query dimension is id or email)
❌ Settings/Config (user_settings)
CREATE TABLE user_settings ( user_id BIGINT PRIMARY KEY, theme VARCHAR(20), -- Changes: light -> dark -> auto language VARCHAR(10), -- Changes: en -> es -> fr notifications JSONB, -- Frequent preference updates updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ ); -- Accessed by user_id, frequently updated, has timestamp but it's not the primary query dimension (the primary query dimension is user_id)
Analysis Output Requirements
For each candidate table provide:
-
Score: Based on criteria (8+ = strong candidate)
-
Pattern: Insert vs update ratio
-
Access: Time-based vs entity lookups
-
Size: Current size and growth rate
-
Queries: Time-range, aggregations, point lookups
Focus on insert-heavy patterns with time-based or sequential access. Tables scoring 8+ points are strong candidates for conversion.