cold-start

Bootstrap a Memory Bank for a new or existing repository, then route into PRD-driven or brownfield workflows.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "cold-start" with this command: npx skills add mrvladd-d/memobank/mrvladd-d-memobank-cold-start

Cold Start: Memory Bank + Agents bootstrap (greenfield & brownfield)

Summary

Note: cold-start is the package skill for all-in-one bootstrap. Do not confuse it with the generated project command /cold-start: that command is a lightweight router used after skeleton creation inside a target repo. For modular usage, prefer individual skills: mb-init (skeleton), mb-from-prd (greenfield), mb-map-codebase (brownfield), mb-review (review), mb-execute (implementation), mb-verify (UAT).

  • What it does: creates the Memory Bank skeleton, writes agent entry points, and routes the repo into the right workflow.
  • Use it when: you want one entry point for either a new project with a PRD or an existing codebase that needs mapping first.
  • Input: repository root plus either prd.md / requirements text or an existing codebase.
  • Output: .memory-bank/, .tasks/, .protocols/, agent entry files, and the next step for greenfield or brownfield work.

Supported scenarios:

  • Greenfield: repo has prd.md or requirements text, but no code yet.
  • Brownfield: repo already contains code and needs as-is documentation before change planning.

Non-negotiable principles

1) Orchestrator vs workers

  • You (main agent) are the orchestrator. You plan and coordinate.
  • Workers (subagents) do the heavy lifting (scanning many files, producing long reports).
  • Max depth = 2: orchestrator → subagent. No sub-sub-agents.

2) .tasks/ is runtime memory (НЕ Memory Bank)

  • Every agent process gets a unique task folder: .tasks/TASK-XXX/.
  • Subagents write detailed outputs there, and return only short summaries to the orchestrator.

3) Avoid conflicts by design

  • Split work by non-overlapping file sets.
  • If overlap is unavoidable, use git branches/worktrees per agent and merge later.

4) Parallelism limits

  • Run up to 5–7 subagents in parallel.
  • If your runtime supports multi-tool calls: spawn parallel subagents in a single orchestrator turn.

5) Docs First

After completing any meaningful unit of work:

  1. Update Memory Bank while context is fresh.
  2. Then change code / commit.

Output you MUST create/maintain

Repo root

  • AGENTS.md (canonical, short, ~100 lines)
  • CLAUDE.md → symlink (or copy) to AGENTS.md
  • (optional) GEMINI.md → symlink (or copy) to AGENTS.md

Repo folders

  • .memory-bank/ — durable knowledge base
  • .tasks/ — operational runtime memory
  • .protocols/ — file-based protocols (plans / decision logs / resume)

Step 0 — Detect environment (don’t guess)

  1. Check what tools you have:

    • Codex available? (Codex CLI / MCP tool)
    • Claude Code available? (CLI claude, subagents)
    • Browser tools? (Playwright / agent-browser / CDP MCP)
  2. Decide primary engine:

    • If working inside Codex: use gpt-5.2-high for implementation and review (prefer fresh sessions for critical reviews).
    • If working inside Claude Code: use subagents for analysis + use Opus for synthesis; optionally call Codex via shell for second opinion or structured review.
    • If both Codex and Claude are available (dual-engine): use Claude for wide-context scanning and synthesis, Codex for structured review and implementation. Cross-validate critical outputs (MB compliance, architecture) by running the review step on the other engine. See Step 4 for the hybrid workflow.

If you don’t control Codex model selection via UI, create a project .codex/config.toml profile set (see Step 1.5).


Step 1 — Bootstrap the skeleton

1.1 Create directories

Create (if missing):

  • .memory-bank/

    • mbb/
    • architecture/
    • guides/
    • adrs/
    • tech-specs/
    • domains/ (optional but recommended)
    • contracts/ (optional but recommended)
    • runbooks/ (optional but recommended)
    • workflows/ (optional; can keep wfs/ if you already use it)
    • quality/ (optional but recommended)
    • testing/
    • skills/
    • epics/
    • features/
    • tasks/ (Memory Bank backlog & plans)
    • commands/ (slash-command specs used by humans/agents)
    • agents/ (subagent prompt library)
    • archive/
    • bugs/
  • .tasks/

  • .protocols/

1.2 Create core files (use the templates)

Use the templates in:

  • ./references/shared-structure-template.md

At minimum you must create:

  • AGENTS.md
  • CLAUDE.md symlink/copy
  • .memory-bank/index.md
  • .memory-bank/mbb/index.md
  • .memory-bank/product.md
  • .memory-bank/requirements.md
  • .memory-bank/testing/index.md
  • .memory-bank/tasks/backlog.md

Also create the command specs under .memory-bank/commands/ (use references/commands/*).

1.2.1 Create native skills (proxy commands)

Create thin proxy skills so commands work natively in each runtime:

  • .claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md → Claude Code + OpenCode
  • .agents/skills/<name>/SKILL.md → Codex CLI + OpenCode

Each proxy just says: Read and follow the instructions in .memory-bank/commands/<name>.md. This makes commands available natively (/mb, /prd, /execute, etc.) in all three tools.

The init-mb.js script creates both sets automatically.

1.3 Enforce frontmatter rule

Every markdown file inside .memory-bank/ must include YAML frontmatter with at least:

  • description: ...
  • status: draft|active|deprecated|archived

1.4 Create .tasks/ protocol

Create a task folder for this run (pick a new id):

  • .tasks/TASK-MB-INIT/

Inside it, create:

  • TASK-MB-INIT-S-00-orchestrator-plan.md — what you will do + which subagents

1.5 Optional: Codex profile presets

If Codex is used, create .codex/config.toml with profiles:

  • default: coding (gpt-5.2, high)
  • profile deep-review: review (gpt-5.2, xhigh)

(If your repo is shared, consider keeping it local or documenting it in .memory-bank/runbooks/.)


Step 2 — Choose scenario

Decision rule

  • If repo has substantial code (src/, package.json, go.mod, Cargo.toml, etc.) → Brownfield (Step 3B).
  • If repo is mostly empty and you have prd.mdGreenfield (Step 3A).
  • If both exist: treat as Brownfield + PRD delta (Step 3B).
  • If repo is empty/new and no prd.mdSkeleton-only (Step 3C).

Record the scenario in:

  • .tasks/TASK-MB-INIT/TASK-MB-INIT-S-00-orchestrator-plan.md

Step 3A — Greenfield workflow (PRD → Memory Bank)

3A.1 Read PRD and do Deep Questioning

  • Read prd.md.
  • If gaps exist, run deep questioning in rounds (3–5 questions each). Use ./references/shared-deep-questioning.md.
  • If PRD mentions “use skills/tools/CLIs” — run /find-skills first (project-installed → marketplace).

If user is temporarily unavailable (“запуск и ушёл”):

  • Record Open questions in .protocols/PRD-BOOTSTRAP/decision-log.md.
  • Stop and wait (do not invent facts; do not proceed to EP/FT/backlog generation without answers).

If the user explicitly wants autonomous mode:

  • record non-blocking gaps as Assumptions
  • halt only on blocking gaps (security/compliance/external contract/data-loss risks)
  • after L1–L3 + review gate, continue with /autonomous

3A.2 Write product brief (L1)

Update .memory-bank/product.md using user’s wording.

3A.3 Requirements + RTM

Update .memory-bank/requirements.md:

  • REQ-IDs
  • RTM table mapping REQ → Epic → Feature → Test

3A.4 Create epics and features

Create:

  • .memory-bank/epics/EP-001-<slug>.md
  • .memory-bank/features/FT-001-<slug>.md

Each feature MUST include:

  • use cases
  • acceptance criteria
  • failure modes / edge cases
  • test strategy pointers

Status policy:

  • Default EP/FT frontmatter to status: draft until Open questions are resolved.
  • Promote to status: active only when acceptance criteria + verification plan are stable.

3A.5 Tasks planning (per-feature, no “everything at once”)

Do not generate a full task backlog for all features in one pass.

Instead:

  1. Create/refresh .memory-bank/tasks/backlog.md as a skeleton (waves + placeholders).
  2. For each selected feature, run /prd-to-tasks FT-<NNN> to produce:
    • .memory-bank/tasks/plans/IMPL-FT-<NNN>.md
    • atomic TASK-* items grouped by waves in backlog.md

3A.6 Identify key concepts and create duo docs

For every non-trivial concept, create a duo:

  • .memory-bank/architecture/<concept>.md (WHAT/WHY)
  • .memory-bank/guides/<concept>.md (HOW)

3A.7 Update index

Update .memory-bank/index.md with annotated links to all created docs.


Step 3B — Brownfield workflow (Repo → Memory Bank)

3B.1 Spawn repo-scanning subagents (parallel)

Create a new task folder:

  • .tasks/TASK-MB-MAP/

Spawn up to 5 subagents in parallel with non-overlapping scopes:

  1. S-01: build/tooling (package managers, scripts, CI)
  2. S-02: backend/services
  3. S-03: frontend/UI
  4. S-04: data layer (DB, migrations, schema)
  5. S-05: tests + quality gates

Each subagent MUST:

  • verify its file glob targets exist ("smart calling")
  • write a detailed report into .tasks/TASK-MB-MAP/ using naming: TASK-MB-MAP-S-0X-final-report-<code|docs>-YY.md
  • return a 5–10 line summary + file list

Use ./agents/shared-repo-scanner.md as baseline prompt, but scope it.

3B.2 Synthesize Memory Bank from reports

Using the .tasks/TASK-MB-MAP/ reports, fill:

  • .memory-bank/product.md — what the system is today
  • .memory-bank/architecture/ — C4 L1–L3 overview + key invariants
  • .memory-bank/runbooks/ — setup, dev, test, deploy
  • .memory-bank/contracts/ — API/event contracts
  • .memory-bank/testing/index.md — canonical gates + verification notes
  • .memory-bank/index.md — annotated links

PRD-less rule (non-negotiable): if there is no prd.md, you MUST NOT create or populate:

  • .memory-bank/epics/*
  • .memory-bank/features/*
  • .memory-bank/tasks/backlog.md with waves/tasks

Empty skeleton files/folders are allowed if they were created by bootstrap.

Repo mapping is as-is documentation, not roadmap planning. If something cannot be derived from code/logs/tests, record it as a hypothesis or an open question.

3B.3 Ask user for PRD delta

After baseline MB exists:

  • ask the user for prd.md describing what to change/add
  • run /prd and /prd-to-tasks style decomposition against the existing baseline

Step 3C — Skeleton-only workflow (no PRD, no code)

When the repo is new/empty and no prd.md is available:

3C.1 Create skeleton only

Run Step 1 as usual — create all directories, core files from templates, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md symlink.

The skeleton provides a ready-to-fill structure: product.md, requirements.md, backlog.md, etc. remain as draft stubs.

3C.2 Ask for PRD

After skeleton is created, ask the user to provide a PRD:

"Memory Bank skeleton created. To fill it with product details, epics, features, and a backlog, please provide a prd.md file (or paste requirements text). You can do this now or later — run /prd when ready."

3C.3 Wait or proceed

  • If user provides PRD now → continue to Step 3A (Greenfield workflow).
  • If user defers → stop here. The skeleton is valid and usable. The user can invoke $mb-from-prd or /prd later to fill the Memory Bank.
  • If user provides partial info → run deep questioning (./references/shared-deep-questioning.md) to extract enough for product.md, then stop and wait for full PRD.

Note: The skeleton-only state is a valid stopping point. AGENTS.md + .memory-bank/index.md + MBB rules are enough for agents to start navigating the repo.


Step 4 — Hybrid mode (Claude ↔ Codex)

If you’re in Claude Code but want Codex quality or long-horizon autonomy:

  1. Use Claude subagents to produce the scan reports into .tasks/TASK-MB-MAP/.
  2. Call Codex via shell to synthesize Memory Bank:
codex exec --ephemeral --full-auto -m gpt-5.2-high \
  'Read .tasks/TASK-MB-MAP and build/refresh .memory-bank per MBB. Keep AGENTS.md short. Produce a summary and run a self-review.'
  1. Then run a Codex deep review profile (or a fresh Claude session) for 5-expert review.

Step 5 — Multi-expert review loop (fresh context)

Run fresh-context reviewers (do not reuse the writer context):

  • Architect (C4 + dependencies)
  • Scope analyst (REQ → Epic → Feature → Task coverage)
  • MBB compliance reviewer (frontmatter, links, atomics, duo)
  • Plan reviewer (backlog quality, waves, gates)
  • Security reviewer (auth, sensitive data, OWASP risks)
  • Code quality reviewer (conditional: if code exists — quality gates, conventions, hotspots)

Use prompts in ./agents/shared-review-*.md and ./agents/shared-mb-reviewer.md.

Rules:

  • If any reviewer returns REJECT → fix MB and repeat review.
  • Persist reviewer reports into .tasks/TASK-MB-REVIEW/.

Step 6 — Start executing tasks

After review gate passes (APPROVE):

  1. Pick the highest-priority task from .memory-bank/tasks/backlog.md.
  2. Run mb-execute for the task (plan → implement → quality gates → MB-SYNC).
  3. Run mb-verify to check acceptance criteria and record evidence.
  4. Repeat until the wave is complete or user stops.

If the intended mode is unattended end-to-end:

  • do not stay in manual loop here
  • switch to generated project command /autonomous

If mb-execute or mb-verify are not installed, follow their SKILL.md manually.


Definition of done

You are done when:

  • AGENTS.md exists, short, points to .memory-bank/index.md.
  • CLAUDE.md is a symlink/copy of AGENTS.md.
  • .memory-bank/ contains at minimum: index + MBB + product + testing (requirements/backlog can remain as stubs until PRD exists).
  • .tasks/ contains scan/review artifacts with naming + stage ids.
  • Greenfield: epics/features/backlog created from PRD.
  • Brownfield: repo mapped as-is into MB and user asked for PRD delta (no roadmap entities invented without PRD).
  • Skeleton-only: skeleton created, user asked for PRD (valid stopping point).
  • Multi-expert review passes (APPROVE) — for Greenfield/Brownfield; skip for Skeleton-only.
  • Execution loop is available (mb-execute + mb-verify reachable or documented).
  • Autonomous loop is available (/autonomous + /autopilot documented).

References in this skill

  • ./references/shared-structure-template.md
  • ./references/shared-deep-questioning.md
  • ./agents/shared-repo-scanner.md
  • ./agents/shared-mb-reviewer.md
  • ./agents/shared-review-architect.md
  • ./agents/shared-review-scope.md
  • ./agents/shared-review-code.md
  • ./agents/shared-review-plan.md
  • ./agents/shared-review-security.md
  • ./scripts/shared-init-mb.js (optional helper)

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

mb-init

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

mb-map-codebase

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

mb-garden

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

mb-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review