lightweight-implementation-analysis-protocol

This skill should be used when fixing bugs, implementing features, debugging issues, or making code changes. Ensures understanding of code flow before implementation by: (1) Tracing execution path with specific file:line references, (2) Creating lightweight text diagrams showing class.method() flows, (3) Verifying understanding with user. Prevents wasted effort from assumptions or guessing. Triggers when users request: bug fixes, feature implementations, refactoring, TDD cycles, debugging, code analysis.

Lightweight Implementation Analysis Protocol

Quick understanding before implementation - just enough to guide TDD, no more.

When This Activates

Before creating implementation plans, fix plans, or TDD cycles for bugs/features.

The Protocol (3 Quick Steps)

1. Trace the Flow

Answer these:

Which event/request triggers this?
Which file:line handles it?
Where does the error occur (file:line)?

2. Quick Diagram

Simple class.method() flow with relevant data:

Event: EventName
  ↓ (contains: relevant fields)
Class.method() [file:line]
  ↓ (what it does)
Class.method() [file:line] ← 💥 Error here
  ↓
Result: What happens

Keep it short - 5-10 lines max.

3. Verify

Ask: "Here's the flow: [diagram]. Correct?"

Wait for confirmation, then proceed.

Example

Problem: Email validation failing

Event: user.email.updated
  ↓ (email: "invalid@")
UpdateUserEmailHandler.execute() [line 281]
  ↓ (validates email format)
EmailValidator.parse() [line 289] ← 💥 Throws ValidationError
  ↓
Result: Error response

Current: Throws
Should: Use safeParse(), return validation error

Rules

Keep it lightweight - This isn't detailed planning, just enough to know what to test
Be specific - File:line, not abstractions
Get confirmation - Don't proceed without it
Skip for trivial changes - Typos, formatting, docs

Anti-Pattern

❌ WRONG: "I'll fix the validation. Here's my plan..." ✅ RIGHT: "Let me trace where the error occurs... [diagram]. Correct?"