compound-docs

Document solved problems for knowledge persistence

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "compound-docs" with this command: npx skills add nth5693/gemini-kit/nth5693-gemini-kit-compound-docs

Compound Documentation Skill

Manages solution documentation in docs/solutions/ for knowledge persistence across sessions.

Overview

When you solve a problem, document it so the solution can be found and reused later.

What do you want to do?

  1. Document a solution → Use /compound workflow
  2. Find existing solutions → See "Searching Solutions" below
  3. Promote to pattern → See "Pattern Promotion" below
  4. Validate schema → See "YAML Validation" below

Instrumentation

# Log usage when using this skill
./scripts/log-skill.sh "compound-docs" "manual" "$$"

Searching Solutions

# Search by keyword
grep -r "keyword" docs/solutions/

# Search by tag
grep -l "tags:.*performance" docs/solutions/**/*.md

# Search by problem type
ls docs/solutions/performance-issues/

Pattern Promotion

When an issue occurs 3+ times:

  1. Search for similar solutions:

    grep -r "similar terms" docs/solutions/
    
  2. Add to critical patterns:

    # Edit docs/solutions/patterns/critical-patterns.md
    
  3. Format:

    ### Pattern #{N}: {Name}
    
    **Problem:** {What goes wrong}
    
    **❌ WRONG:**
    ```code
    {incorrect}
    

    ✅ CORRECT:

    {correct}
    

YAML Validation

All solutions must have valid frontmatter:

---
date: "YYYY-MM-DD"
problem_type: "{from schema.yaml}"
severity: "critical|high|medium|low"
symptoms:
  - "symptom 1"
root_cause: "{from schema.yaml}"
tags:
  - tag1
---

See docs/solutions/schema.yaml for valid enum values.

Documenting Failures & Learnings

When documenting solutions, capture the full journey:

What to Include

  • ✅ Failed attempts with explanations
  • ✅ Incorrect assumptions and corrections
  • ✅ Key insights from mistakes
  • ✅ Course corrections and why
  • ✅ Time investment (helps prioritize future similar issues)

Example Pattern

## Investigation Steps

| Attempt | Hypothesis | Result |
|---------|------------|--------|
| 1. Check API logs | API might be timing out | ❌ No timeouts found |
| 2. Review database queries | N+1 query suspected | ❌ Queries were optimized |
| 3. Check cache invalidation | Cache might be stale | ✅ Found cache not clearing |

## Lessons Learned

### Mistakes Made
- **Assumption:** Assumed the API was the bottleneck
  - **Why wrong:** Didn't check cache layer first
  - **Correction:** Should always check cache before API

### Key Breakthrough
- **Insight:** Realized cache invalidation logic was only running on UPDATE, not DELETE
  - **Impact:** Led directly to the solution

[!TIP] Document the journey, not just the destination. Future readers learn from understanding WHY failed approaches didn't work.

References

  • Schema: docs/solutions/schema.yaml
  • Template: docs/solutions/templates/solution-template.md
  • Patterns: docs/solutions/patterns/critical-patterns.md

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

testing

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

debug

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

session-resume

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

code-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review