defense-in-depth validation

Defense-in-Depth Validation

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "defense-in-depth validation" with this command: npx skills add obra/superpowers-skills/obra-superpowers-skills-defense-in-depth-validation

Defense-in-Depth Validation

Overview

When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.

Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.

Why Multiple Layers

Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"

Different layers catch different cases:

  • Entry validation catches most bugs

  • Business logic catches edge cases

  • Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers

  • Debug logging helps when other layers fail

The Four Layers

Layer 1: Entry Point Validation

Purpose: Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary

function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) { if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') { throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty'); } if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) { throw new Error(workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}); } if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) { throw new Error(workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}); } // ... proceed }

Layer 2: Business Logic Validation

Purpose: Ensure data makes sense for this operation

function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) { if (!projectDir) { throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization'); } // ... proceed }

Layer 3: Environment Guards

Purpose: Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts

async function gitInit(directory: string) { // In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') { const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory)); const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));

if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
  throw new Error(
    `Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`
  );
}

} // ... proceed }

Layer 4: Debug Instrumentation

Purpose: Capture context for forensics

async function gitInit(directory: string) { const stack = new Error().stack; logger.debug('About to git init', { directory, cwd: process.cwd(), stack, }); // ... proceed }

Applying the Pattern

When you find a bug:

  • Trace the data flow - Where does bad value originate? Where used?

  • Map all checkpoints - List every point data passes through

  • Add validation at each layer - Entry, business, environment, debug

  • Test each layer - Try to bypass layer 1, verify layer 2 catches it

Example from Session

Bug: Empty projectDir caused git init in source code

Data flow:

  • Test setup → empty string

  • Project.create(name, '')

  • WorkspaceManager.createWorkspace('')

  • git init runs in process.cwd()

Four layers added:

  • Layer 1: Project.create() validates not empty/exists/writable

  • Layer 2: WorkspaceManager validates projectDir not empty

  • Layer 3: WorktreeManager refuses git init outside tmpdir in tests

  • Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init

Result: All 1847 tests passed, bug impossible to reproduce

Key Insight

All four layers were necessary. During testing, each layer caught bugs the others missed:

  • Different code paths bypassed entry validation

  • Mocks bypassed business logic checks

  • Edge cases on different platforms needed environment guards

  • Debug logging identified structural misuse

Don't stop at one validation point. Add checks at every layer.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

Repository SourceNeeds Review
31.3K85.6Kobra
General

executing-plans

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Repository SourceNeeds Review
24.5K85.6Kobra
General

verification-before-completion

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Repository SourceNeeds Review
18.9K85.6Kobra
General

writing-skills

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment

Repository SourceNeeds Review
18.1K85.6Kobra