finishing-a-development-branch

Finishing a Development Branch

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "finishing-a-development-branch" with this command: npx skills add oimiragieo/agent-studio/oimiragieo-agent-studio-finishing-a-development-branch

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.

Core principle: Verify tests -> Present options -> Execute choice -> Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:

Run project's test suite

npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests fail:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

Try common base branches

git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null

Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

Step 3: Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

  1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
  2. Push and create a Pull Request
  3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
  4. Discard this work

Which option?

Don't add explanation - keep options concise.

Step 4: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

Switch to base branch

git checkout <base-branch>

Pull latest

git pull

Merge feature branch

git merge <feature-branch>

Verify tests on merged result

<test command>

If tests pass

git branch -d <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 2: Push and Create PR

Push branch

git push -u origin <feature-branch>

Create PR

gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'

Summary

<2-3 bullets of what changed>

Test Plan

  • <verification steps> EOF )"

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."

Don't cleanup worktree.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:

  • Branch <name>
  • All commits: <commit-list>
  • Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for exact confirmation.

If confirmed:

git checkout <base-branch> git branch -D <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Step 4.5: Cleanup Scan (MANDATORY)

Run this before ANY commit, regardless of which option was chosen.

4.5.1 — Project root scan:

ls -1 | grep -vE '^(.|node_modules|src|tests|scripts|dist|build|docs|package.json|package-lock.json|pnpm-lock.yaml|tsconfig|eslint|prettier|jest|vitest|README|LICENSE|CHANGELOG|CLAUDE.md|.env)'

If this outputs anything, those files are AI slop. Delete or move them before proceeding.

4.5.2 — Prune stale worktrees:

git worktree prune

4.5.3 — Clean temp directory:

ls .claude/context/tmp/ 2>/dev/null && echo "Temp files exist — delete if from this session"

4.5.4 — Log to session gap log if slop was found:

echo '{"timestamp":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","type":"cleanup","agent":"developer","description":"Deleted AI slop from project root: <filenames>","context":"finishing-a-development-branch cleanup scan"}' >> .claude/context/runtime/session-gap-log.jsonl

4.5.5 — Queue reflection if slop was found (append to reflection-spawn-request.json ):

{ "id": "<uuid>", "trigger": "ai-slop-found", "priority": "low", "context": "Cleanup scan found unexpected files in project root. Investigate which task created them." }

See .claude/rules/cleanup-always.md for the full slop pattern list and correct file destinations.

Step 5: Cleanup Worktree

For Options 1, 2, 4:

Check if in worktree:

git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)

If yes:

git worktree remove <worktree-path>

For Option 3: Keep worktree.

Quick Reference

Option Merge Push Keep Worktree Cleanup Branch

  1. Merge locally Yes

Yes

  1. Create PR

Yes Yes

  1. Keep as-is

Yes

  1. Discard

Yes (force)

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification

  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR

  • Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

Open-ended questions

  • Problem: "What should I do next?" -> ambiguous

  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options

Automatic worktree cleanup

  • Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)

  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

No confirmation for discard

  • Problem: Accidentally delete work

  • Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests

  • Merge without verifying tests on result

  • Delete work without confirmation

  • Force-push without explicit request

Always:

  • Verify tests before offering options

  • Present exactly 4 options

  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4

  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only

Integration

Called by:

  • subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete

  • executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete

Pairs with:

  • using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill

Documentation Gate (BLOCKING — must pass before commit)

Before ANY commit on a feature/skill/agent branch:

  • CHANGELOG.md — entry added under [Unreleased] with today's date

  • README.md — updated if agent/skill counts changed or new user-facing capability added

  • .env.example — commented entry added for EVERY new API key, token, or env var introduced

  • Skill/agent description — frontmatter description: accurately reflects new capabilities

If any item is unchecked → DO NOT COMMIT. Update docs first.

Iron Laws

  • ALWAYS run the full test suite and verify it passes before offering any merge/PR option — presenting merge options with failing tests leads to broken main branches and failed CI pipelines.

  • NEVER force-push to main/master or squash commits without explicit user request — these operations rewrite history and can permanently destroy teammates' work.

  • ALWAYS present exactly the 4 structured options (merge, PR, keep, discard) — open-ended "what next?" questions cause confusion and missed cleanup steps.

  • NEVER delete a branch or discard work without typed confirmation from the user — accidental deletion of uncommitted work is irreversible.

  • ALWAYS clean up the worktree for Options 1 and 4 but preserve it for Options 2 and 3 — orphaned worktrees accumulate and confuse future git operations.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern Why It Fails Correct Approach

Skipping test verification before merge Broken code lands on main; CI fails after the fact Always run test suite first; gate options on passing tests

Presenting open-ended completion questions Developer doesn't know available paths; worktrees left orphaned Present exactly 4 numbered options with clear labels

Deleting branch without confirmation Developer loses in-progress work permanently Require typed "discard" confirmation for Option 4

Cleaning up worktree for Option 2 (PR) Kills local context before PR review is complete Only remove worktree for Options 1 and 4

Merging directly without pulling latest base Merge conflicts or stale base; CI detects drift git pull on base branch before git merge

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md

  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

pyqt6-ui-development-rules

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

code-analyzer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

gcloud-cli

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

github-mcp

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review