Writing Job Descriptions (Outcome-Based)

Scope

Covers

• Turning a vague “we should hire X” into a clear role outcome + success scorecard

• Defining competency spikes (major/minor) instead of a generic laundry list

• Writing a high-signal job description that is honest about context (pace, constraints, trade-offs)

• Building a lightweight iteration loop to improve the JD after real candidate conversations

When to use

• “Write a job description / job posting for …”

• “Create a role scorecard / success profile for a new hire.”

• “Make this JD more high-signal (it’s generic and attracting everyone).”

• “Rewrite our JD around outcomes instead of responsibilities.”

When NOT to use

• You haven’t decided whether to hire vs restructure/contract/automation (do org planning first)

• You need a full interview loop / evaluation rubric / hiring process design (separate workstream)

• You need legal/HR review for compliance wording (this skill is not legal advice)

Inputs

Minimum required

• Role title + level + function (e.g., “Senior Product Designer”, “Staff Backend Engineer”)

• Team/context (what you build; who the role reports to; key partners)

• Why hire now + the “progress” this role must create

• Success definition: 3–6 outcomes for 12 months after start

• Working model + constraints (remote/hybrid, time zones, travel, on-call, pace)

Missing-info strategy

• Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.

• If answers aren’t available, proceed with explicit assumptions and offer 2 versions: conservative/inclusive and high-intensity/polarizing (if appropriate).

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Job Description Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

• Context snapshot

• Role scorecard: success at 12 months (+ optional 30/60/90)

• Competency spike map: majors/minors + “evidence of strength”

• Job description draft (public): outcome-based, high-signal

• Filters: who will thrive / who should not apply (honest, non-discriminatory)

• Iteration plan + version log: what to test and how to update after candidate conversations

• Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md

Workflow (7 steps)

1. Intake + constraints (don’t start writing yet)

• Inputs: user request; references/INTAKE.md.

• Actions: Clarify role, level, “why now”, constraints (location, pace, comp bands if available), and what “good” looks like. Identify what you can/can’t say publicly.

• Outputs: Context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list.

• Checks: You can state in one sentence: “We are hiring X to achieve Y by Z.”

2. Define “success 12 months later” (scorecard)

• Inputs: business goals, current pains, manager expectations.

• Actions: Write 3–6 outcomes that would make you “clink champagne” in 12 months. Add measurable indicators where possible.

• Outputs: Role scorecard (12-month success).

• Checks: Outcomes describe business impact and shipped/owned artifacts, not just activities.

3. Decide the competency spikes (major/minor)

• Inputs: role scorecard.

• Actions: Choose 1 major spike and 1–2 minor spikes. Define what “strong” looks like and how to recognize it (work samples, narratives, portfolio, shipped systems).

• Outputs: Competency spike map.

• Checks: Spikes explain why a generalist won’t work; each spike ties to at least one 12-month outcome.

4. Translate outcomes into responsibilities (progress over laundry lists)

• Inputs: scorecard + spikes.

• Actions: Convert outcomes into 6–10 responsibilities phrased as progress (“Own X end-to-end”, “Reduce Y from A→B”) rather than “attend meetings”. Remove arbitrary requirements.

• Outputs: Responsibilities section draft.

• Checks: Every responsibility maps to at least one outcome; anything that doesn’t map is cut or re-justified.

5. Add the “truth” section (high-signal + filtering)

• Inputs: team reality: pace, constraints, trade-offs.

• Actions: Write a candid “How we work / What’s hard here” section and a “Who will thrive / Who won’t” filter. Use polarizing clarity without illegal/discriminatory language.

• Outputs: Context truth + filters.

• Checks: A candidate can self-select in/out; claims are honest and specific (not hype).

6. Draft the public job description (clean, inclusive, skimmable)

• Inputs: templates; company/role basics.

• Actions: Assemble a complete JD using references/TEMPLATES.md. Keep requirements minimal; separate must-haves vs nice-to-haves; avoid jargon and bias.

• Outputs: JD draft (public).

• Checks: In 90 seconds, a qualified candidate can answer: “What will I accomplish? Why here? What do I need to be great at?”

7. Iterate + quality gate + finalize pack

• Inputs: JD draft; any candidate feedback; hiring manager review.

• Actions: Propose what to test (which section is failing: attract vs filter). Create an iteration log. Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks/Open questions/Next steps.

• Outputs: Final Job Description Pack.

• Checks: The pack is internally aligned and externally high-signal; unknowns are explicit; iteration triggers are defined.

Quality gate (required)

• Use references/CHECKLISTS.md and references/RUBRIC.md.

• Always include: Risks, Open questions, Next steps.

Examples

Example 1 (Startup, high-pace): “Write a job description for a founding Product Designer for a seed-stage B2B AI tool. We need someone who can ship end-to-end in ambiguity. Include success at 12 months and a candid ‘what’s hard here’ section.”

Expected: clear 12-month outcomes, a design-major spike, honest pace/constraints, and filters that self-select the wrong candidates out.

Example 2 (Scale-up, specialized spike): “Create a role scorecard + job posting for a Staff Backend Engineer owning reliability for a high-traffic API. Emphasize systems thinking and incident ownership.”

Expected: outcome-based responsibilities tied to reliability outcomes, plus a clear major spike (operational excellence) and measurable success criteria.

Boundary example: “Write a JD for a ‘rockstar generalist’ to ‘do whatever is needed’ (no outcomes).”

Response: refuse to invent a laundry list; run intake, define 12-month outcomes and spikes first, then draft.