security

/security - Security Audit Workflow

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "security" with this command: npx skills add parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/parcadei-continuous-claude-v3-security

/security - Security Audit Workflow

Dedicated security analysis for sensitive code.

When to Use

  • "Security audit"

  • "Check for vulnerabilities"

  • "Is this secure?"

  • "Review authentication code"

  • "Check for injection attacks"

  • Before handling auth, payments, user data

  • After adding security-sensitive features

Workflow Overview

┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ aegis │───▶│ arbiter │ │ │ │ │ └─────────┘ └───────────┘ Security Verify audit fixes

Agent Sequence

Agent Role Output

1 aegis Comprehensive security scan Vulnerability report

2 arbiter Verify fixes, run security tests Verification report

Why Dedicated Security?

The /review workflow focuses on code quality. Security needs:

  • Specialized vulnerability patterns

  • Dependency scanning

  • Secret detection

  • OWASP Top 10 checks

  • Authentication/authorization review

Execution

Phase 1: Security Audit

Task( subagent_type="aegis", prompt=""" Security audit: [SCOPE]

Scan for:

Injection Attacks:

  • SQL injection
  • Command injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • LDAP injection

Authentication/Authorization:

  • Broken authentication
  • Session management issues
  • Privilege escalation
  • Insecure direct object references

Data Protection:

  • Sensitive data exposure
  • Hardcoded secrets/credentials
  • Insecure cryptography
  • Missing encryption

Configuration:

  • Security misconfigurations
  • Default credentials
  • Verbose error messages
  • Missing security headers

Dependencies:

  • Known vulnerable packages
  • Outdated dependencies
  • Supply chain risks

Output: Detailed report with:

  • Severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
  • Location (file:line)
  • Description
  • Remediation steps """ )

Phase 2: Verification (After Fixes)

Task( subagent_type="arbiter", prompt=""" Verify security fixes: [SCOPE]

Run:

  • Security-focused tests
  • Dependency audit (npm audit, pip audit)
  • Re-check reported vulnerabilities
  • Verify fixes don't introduce regressions

Output: Verification report """ )

Security Scopes

Full Codebase

User: /security → Scan entire codebase

Specific Area

User: /security authentication → Focus on auth-related code

Single File

User: /security src/api/auth.py → Deep dive on one file

Dependencies Only

User: /security --deps → Only dependency vulnerabilities

Example

User: /security the payment processing code

Claude: Starting /security audit for payment code...

Phase 1: Security audit... [Spawns aegis]

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Security Audit Report │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Scope: src/services/payment/ │ │ Files scanned: 12 │ │ Lines analyzed: 2,847 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ CRITICAL (1) │ │ ────────── │ │ [C1] SQL Injection in payment.py:89 │ │ query = f"SELECT * FROM orders WHERE id = {order_id}" │ │ Fix: Use parameterized queries │ │ │ │ HIGH (2) │ │ ──────── │ │ [H1] Hardcoded API key in stripe_client.py:12 │ │ STRIPE_KEY = "sk_live_..." │ │ Fix: Move to environment variable │ │ │ │ [H2] Missing input validation in refund.py:45 │ │ amount = request.json['amount'] # No validation │ │ Fix: Validate amount is positive number │ │ │ │ MEDIUM (1) │ │ ────────── │ │ [M1] Verbose error messages in error_handler.py:23 │ │ return {"error": str(e)} # Leaks internal details │ │ Fix: Return generic message, log details internally │ │ │ │ LOW (0) │ │ ─────── │ │ None │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Summary: 1 critical, 2 high, 1 medium, 0 low │ │ Status: BLOCKING - Fix critical issues before release │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Fix the critical and high issues, then run: /security --verify

After Fixes

User: /security --verify

Claude: Phase 2: Verifying fixes... [Spawns arbiter]

✅ C1: SQL injection fixed - using parameterized queries ✅ H1: API key moved to environment variable ✅ H2: Input validation added ✅ M1: Error messages sanitized

All security tests passing. Security audit: PASSED

OWASP Top 10 Coverage

Risk Checked

A01 Broken Access Control ✅

A02 Cryptographic Failures ✅

A03 Injection ✅

A04 Insecure Design ✅

A05 Security Misconfiguration ✅

A06 Vulnerable Components ✅

A07 Auth Failures ✅

A08 Data Integrity Failures ✅

A09 Logging Failures ✅

A10 SSRF ✅

Flags

  • --deps : Dependencies only

  • --verify : Re-run after fixes

  • --owasp : Explicit OWASP Top 10 report

  • --secrets : Focus on secret detection

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

discovery-interview

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

github-search

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

dead-code

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review