react-composition-2026

Modern React Composition Patterns

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "react-composition-2026" with this command: npx skills add patternsdev/skills/patternsdev-skills-react-composition-2026

Modern React Composition Patterns

Table of Contents

  • When to Use

  • Instructions

  • Details

  • Source

Composition patterns for building flexible, maintainable React components that scale. These patterns replace boolean-prop proliferation, rigid component APIs, and tangled state with composable, explicit designs.

When to Use

Reference these patterns when:

  • A component has more than 3-4 boolean props controlling its behavior

  • Building reusable UI components or a shared component library

  • Refactoring components that are difficult to extend

  • Designing component APIs that other teams will consume

  • Reviewing component architecture for flexibility and maintainability

Instructions

  • Apply these patterns during component design, code generation, and review. When you see boolean prop accumulation or rigid component APIs, suggest the appropriate composition pattern.

Details

Overview

The core principle: composition over configuration. Instead of adding boolean props and conditional branches to handle every variant, compose smaller, focused components together. This makes components easier to understand, test, and extend — for both humans and AI agents.

  1. Replace Boolean Props with Composition

Impact: HIGH — Prevents combinatorial explosion and makes intent explicit.

Boolean props multiply complexity: 4 booleans = 16 possible states, most of which are untested. Replace them with composable children.

Avoid — boolean prop accumulation:

<Card showHeader showFooter collapsible bordered withShadow headerAction="close" size="large" />

Prefer — explicit composition:

<Card variant="bordered" shadow="md"> <Card.Header> <h3>Title</h3> <Card.CloseButton /> </Card.Header> <Card.Body collapsible> <p>Content here</p> </Card.Body> <Card.Footer> <Button>Save</Button> </Card.Footer> </Card>

Each piece is explicit, testable, and independently optional.

  1. Build Compound Components with Context

Impact: HIGH — Shared implicit state without prop drilling.

Compound components are a group of components that work together, sharing state through context rather than props. The parent owns the state; children consume it.

Avoid — parent manages everything through props:

<Select options={options} value={value} onChange={onChange} renderOption={(opt) => <span>{opt.icon} {opt.label}</span>} renderSelected={(opt) => <b>{opt.label}</b>} placeholder="Choose..." clearable searchable maxHeight={300} />

Prefer — compound components:

const SelectContext = createContext<SelectState | null>(null)

function Select({ children, value, onChange }: SelectProps) { const [open, setOpen] = useState(false) const ctx = useMemo(() => ({ value, onChange, open, setOpen }), [value, onChange, open])

return ( <SelectContext.Provider value={ctx}> <div className="select-root">{children}</div> </SelectContext.Provider> ) }

function Trigger({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const { open, setOpen } = useSelectContext() return <button onClick={() => setOpen(!open)}>{children}</button> }

function Options({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const { open } = useSelectContext() if (!open) return null return <ul role="listbox">{children}</ul> }

function Option({ value, children }: OptionProps) { const { value: selected, onChange, setOpen } = useSelectContext() return ( <li role="option" aria-selected={value === selected} onClick={() => { onChange(value); setOpen(false) }} > {children} </li> ) }

Select.Trigger = Trigger Select.Options = Options Select.Option = Option

Usage:

<Select value={color} onChange={setColor}> <Select.Trigger>Pick a color</Select.Trigger> <Select.Options> <Select.Option value="red">Red</Select.Option> <Select.Option value="blue">Blue</Select.Option> </Select.Options> </Select>

  1. Create Explicit Variant Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Makes each mode a clear, focused component.

When a component has distinct "modes" (dialog vs drawer, inline vs modal, card vs list-item), create explicit variant components instead of toggling with props.

Avoid — one component with mode props:

function MediaDisplay({ type, src, title, showControls, autoPlay, loop }: Props) { if (type === 'video') { return <video src={src} controls={showControls} autoPlay={autoPlay} loop={loop} /> } if (type === 'audio') { return <audio src={src} controls={showControls} /> } return <img src={src} alt={title} /> }

Prefer — explicit variants:

function VideoPlayer({ src, controls, autoPlay, loop }: VideoProps) { return <video src={src} controls={controls} autoPlay={autoPlay} loop={loop} /> }

function AudioPlayer({ src, controls }: AudioProps) { return <audio src={src} controls={controls} /> }

function Image({ src, alt }: ImageProps) { return <img src={src} alt={alt} /> }

Each variant has exactly the props it needs — no impossible states, no unused props.

  1. Use Children Over Render Props for Composition

Impact: MEDIUM — Simpler API, better readability.

Render props (renderHeader , renderItem ) were essential before hooks, but today children provides cleaner composition for most cases.

Avoid — render prop proliferation:

<DataTable data={users} renderHeader={() => <h2>Users</h2>} renderRow={(user) => <UserRow user={user} />} renderEmpty={() => <EmptyState />} renderFooter={() => <Pagination />} />

Prefer — children composition:

<DataTable data={users}> <DataTable.Header> <h2>Users</h2> </DataTable.Header> <DataTable.Body> {users.map(user => <UserRow key={user.id} user={user} />)} </DataTable.Body> <DataTable.Empty> <EmptyState /> </DataTable.Empty> <DataTable.Footer> <Pagination /> </DataTable.Footer> </DataTable>

Reserve render props for cases where the parent needs to provide data to the renderer (e.g., virtualized list items).

  1. Decouple State Implementation from UI

Impact: MEDIUM — Swap state management without changing components.

Define a generic interface for your state shape (value, actions, metadata), then let providers implement it. Components consume the interface, not the implementation.

Define the interface:

interface CounterState { count: number increment: () => void decrement: () => void isLoading: boolean }

const CounterContext = createContext<CounterState | null>(null)

function useCounter() { const ctx = useContext(CounterContext) if (!ctx) throw new Error('useCounter must be used within a CounterProvider') return ctx }

Implement with local state:

function LocalCounterProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const [count, setCount] = useState(0) const value = useMemo(() => ({ count, increment: () => setCount(c => c + 1), decrement: () => setCount(c => c - 1), isLoading: false, }), [count]) return <CounterContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</CounterContext.Provider> }

Swap to API-backed state without changing consumers:

function ApiCounterProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const { data, mutate } = useSWR('/api/counter', fetcher) const value = useMemo(() => ({ count: data?.count ?? 0, increment: () => mutate(patch('/api/counter', { delta: 1 })), decrement: () => mutate(patch('/api/counter', { delta: -1 })), isLoading: !data, }), [data, mutate]) return <CounterContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</CounterContext.Provider> }

The useCounter() consumers never change.

  1. Lift State to Provider Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Enables sibling communication without prop threading.

When two sibling components need shared state, lift it into a provider rather than threading callbacks through the parent.

Avoid — parent threads state to siblings:

function Page() { const [selected, setSelected] = useState<string | null>(null) return ( <div> <Sidebar selected={selected} onSelect={setSelected} /> <Detail selected={selected} /> </div> ) }

Prefer — provider manages shared state:

function SelectionProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const [selected, setSelected] = useState<string | null>(null) return ( <SelectionContext.Provider value={{ selected, setSelected }}> {children} </SelectionContext.Provider> ) }

function Page() { return ( <SelectionProvider> <Sidebar /> <Detail /> </SelectionProvider> ) }

Both Sidebar and Detail consume useSelection() directly.

  1. Use Polymorphic as Props for Flexible Elements

Impact: MEDIUM — One component, any underlying element or component.

The as prop pattern lets consumers control the rendered element while keeping your component's styles and behavior.

type BoxProps<C extends React.ElementType = 'div'> = { as?: C children: React.ReactNode } & Omit<React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<C>, 'as' | 'children'>

function Box<C extends React.ElementType = 'div'>({ as, children, ...props }: BoxProps<C>) { const Component = as || 'div' return <Component {...props}>{children}</Component> }

Usage:

<Box>Default div</Box> <Box as="section">A section</Box> <Box as="a" href="/about">A link</Box> <Box as={Link} to="/about">Router link</Box>

  1. React 19: Drop forwardRef , Use ref as a Prop

Impact: MEDIUM — Simpler component definitions.

React 19 passes ref as a regular prop. No more forwardRef wrapper.

React 18 (deprecated pattern):

const Input = forwardRef<HTMLInputElement, InputProps>(function Input(props, ref) { return <input ref={ref} {...props} /> })

React 19:

function Input({ ref, ...props }: InputProps & { ref?: React.Ref<HTMLInputElement> }) { return <input ref={ref} {...props} /> }

Similarly, use() can read either promises or context and can be called conditionally:

import { use } from 'react'

function Panel({ themePromise }: { themePromise: Promise<Theme> }) { const theme = use(themePromise) // unwraps promise const user = use(UserContext) // conditional context read return <div className={theme.bg}>{user.name}</div> }

  1. Slot Pattern for Layout Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Named insertion points without render props.

For layout components with multiple content areas, use a slot pattern based on child type detection or named sub-components.

function AppLayout({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const slots = React.Children.toArray(children) const header = slots.find( (child): child is React.ReactElement => React.isValidElement(child) && child.type === AppLayout.Header ) const content = slots.filter( (child) => !React.isValidElement(child) || child.type !== AppLayout.Header )

return ( <div className="app-layout"> <header>{header}</header> <main>{content}</main> </div> ) }

AppLayout.Header = function Header({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { return <>{children}</> }

Usage:

<AppLayout> <AppLayout.Header> <Logo /> <Nav /> </AppLayout.Header> <Dashboard /> </AppLayout>

  1. Headless Components for Maximum Flexibility

Impact: HIGH — Logic without opinions about rendering.

Headless components provide behavior (state, keyboard handling, ARIA attributes) without any markup. Consumers supply the rendering.

function useToggle(initial = false) { const [on, setOn] = useState(initial) const toggle = useCallback(() => setOn(o => !o), []) const buttonProps = { 'aria-pressed': on, onClick: toggle, role: 'switch' as const, } return { on, toggle, buttonProps } }

Usage — consumer controls all rendering:

function DarkModeSwitch() { const { on, buttonProps } = useToggle(false) return ( <button {...buttonProps} className={on ? 'dark' : 'light'}> {on ? 'Dark' : 'Light'} Mode </button> ) }

Libraries like Radix UI, Headless UI, and React Aria follow this pattern. Prefer them over fully-styled component libraries when you need design flexibility.

Source

Patterns from patterns.dev — composition guidance for the broader React community.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

hooks-pattern

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ai-ui-patterns

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

react-2026

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

react-data-fetching

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review