Slide Excellence Review

Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of lecture slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized.

Steps

1. Identify the File

Parse $ARGUMENTS for the filename. Resolve path in Quarto/ or Slides/ .

2. Run Review Agents in Parallel

Agent 1: Visual Audit (slide-auditor)

• Overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, images

• Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md

Agent 2: Pedagogical Review (pedagogy-reviewer)

• 13 pedagogical patterns, narrative, pacing, notation

• Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_pedagogy_report.md

Agent 3: Proofreading (proofreader)

• Grammar, typos, consistency, academic quality, citations

• Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md

Agent 4: TikZ Review (only if file contains TikZ)

• Label overlaps, geometric accuracy, visual semantics

• Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md

Agent 5: Content Parity (only for .qmd files with corresponding .tex)

• Frame count comparison, environment parity, content drift

• Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_parity_report.md

Agent 6: Substance Review (optional, for .tex files)

• Domain correctness via domain-reviewer protocol

• Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md

3. Synthesize Combined Summary

Slide Excellence Review: [Filename]

Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]

Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)

Medium Issues (Next Revision)

Recommended Next Steps

Quality Score Rubric

Score Critical Medium Meaning

Excellent 0-2 0-5 Ready to present

Good 3-5 6-15 Minor refinements

Needs Work 6-10 16-30 Significant revision

Poor 11+ 31+ Major restructuring