Toolchain Preferences
Default technology stack and tooling choices for new projects.
Package Management
pnpm (Default)
Why pnpm:
-
Faster than npm/yarn
-
Disk-efficient through content-addressable storage
-
Strict by default (no phantom dependencies)
-
Better monorepo support
Usage:
pnpm install pnpm add <package> pnpm dev
Version Management: asdf
Node.js version per project:
.tool-versions
nodejs 22.15.0
Ensures consistent environments across projects and machines.
Core Stack
Framework: Next.js App Router + TypeScript
Why Next.js:
-
Full-stack React framework
-
Server components, streaming, React Server Components (RSC)
-
Excellent developer experience, fast iteration
-
Zero-config routing, API routes, server actions
Always TypeScript:
-
Type safety from database to UI
-
Better IDE support, refactoring confidence
-
Catches errors at compile time
Backend: Convex
Why Convex:
-
Real-time database as a service
-
Type-safe from database to UI (auto-generated types)
-
Reactive queries with automatic caching
-
No API layer needed — direct function calls
-
Built-in auth, file storage, scheduling
When to use:
-
Real-time features (chat, collaboration, live updates)
-
Rapid prototyping (skip API boilerplate)
-
Type-safe full-stack (database → UI)
Alternative: tRPC + Prisma for non-real-time apps
Deployment: Vercel
Why Vercel:
-
Zero-config Next.js deployment
-
Edge functions, analytics, preview deployments
-
Tight integration with Next.js features (middleware, ISR, etc.)
-
Great DX (git push → deployed)
UI Stack
Styling: Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui
Tailwind CSS:
-
Utility-first CSS for fast iteration
-
Consistent design system via tailwind.config.ts
-
No CSS file overhead, tree-shakeable
-
Responsive, dark mode, arbitrary values
shadcn/ui:
-
Copy-paste components (NOT a dependency)
-
Full control over component code
-
Built on Radix primitives
-
Accessible by default
Alternative: Use Radix UI directly for full customization
State Management: Zustand
Why Zustand:
-
Minimal boilerplate vs Redux
-
Simple API, works with React patterns
-
Good for client-side state (Convex handles server state)
When to use:
-
Client-side UI state (modals, forms, preferences)
-
Cross-component state without prop drilling
Alternative: React Context + hooks for simple cases
Data Handling: TanStack Query + TanStack Table
TanStack Query:
-
Server state management (when NOT using Convex)
-
Caching, refetching, optimistic updates
-
Replaces Redux for server data
TanStack Table:
-
Headless table logic (sorting, filtering, pagination)
-
Works with any UI framework
-
Fully customizable, accessible
Observability Stack
Error Tracking: Sentry (Required)
Why Sentry:
-
Source maps: Translates minified errors to readable stack traces
-
Deduplication: 10,000 identical errors → 1 alert
-
Breadcrumbs: Auto-records user actions before crash
-
Vercel integration: Automatic source map uploads
Setup:
pnpm add @sentry/nextjs npx @sentry/wizard@latest -i nextjs
Free tier: 5K errors/month — enough until you have traction.
Product Analytics: PostHog (Required for user-facing apps)
Why PostHog:
-
Terraform-native: Only major analytics with official Terraform provider
-
All-in-one: Analytics + feature flags + session replay + A/B testing
-
Developer-first: Open source, self-hostable, transparent pricing
-
CLI-manageable: Fits agentic development workflow
Setup:
pnpm add posthog-js
Free tier: 1M events/month — generous for most apps.
Track conversion events only: signup, subscription, import, key actions. Let autocapture handle generic clicks.
NOT Vercel Analytics
Do NOT use Vercel Analytics. It has:
-
No API access
-
No CLI access
-
No MCP server
-
No way to query programmatically
This makes it completely unusable for AI-assisted workflows. PostHog handles web vitals AND product analytics with full API/MCP access.
Structured Logging: Pino
Why Pino:
-
Fastest Node.js logger
-
JSON output in production
-
Pretty output in development
Edge runtime fallback: Use structured console.log when Pino not available.
Avoid
❌ Mixpanel/Amplitude — Poor CLI automation, expensive at scale
❌ Custom analytics — 800+ hours to reach feature parity; free tiers cover you
❌ Google Analytics — Privacy concerns, poor product analytics
❌ Dashboard-only tools — No CLI/API = not automatable
❌ Vercel Analytics — No API, no CLI, no MCP (completely unusable for our workflow)
Decision Tree
User-facing app?
-
YES → Sentry + PostHog
-
NO (internal tool) → Sentry + structured logging only
Need feature flags?
-
YES → PostHog feature flags (skip LaunchDarkly)
-
NO → Skip for now, easy to add later
Need session replay?
-
YES → PostHog session replay
-
NO → Skip (costs extra)
Build Tools
Default Build Tool by Project Type
Next.js projects:
-
Use Next.js built-in build (Turbopack or webpack)
-
Zero config, optimized for framework
Standalone apps (React/Vue/Svelte):
-
Vite: Fast, modern, great DX
-
HMR, instant server start, optimized builds
Libraries:
-
tsup: Simple TypeScript bundler
-
unbuild: Clean, minimal builds
Testing
Vitest (Default)
Why Vitest:
-
Fast, modern test runner
-
Compatible with Jest API (easy migration)
-
Great TypeScript support
-
Watch mode, coverage, snapshots
When to use:
-
Unit tests, integration tests
-
Component testing (with @testing-library/react)
E2E Testing:
- Playwright for end-to-end tests
Quick Reference
New Project Setup
Create Next.js app with TypeScript
npx create-next-app@latest --typescript --tailwind --app
Use pnpm
pnpm install
Add Convex
pnpm add convex npx convex dev
Add shadcn/ui
npx shadcn@latest init npx shadcn@latest add button card
Add Zustand (if needed)
pnpm add zustand
Add testing
pnpm add -D vitest @testing-library/react @testing-library/jest-dom
Dependency Decision Tree
Need real-time data?
-
YES → Convex
-
NO → TanStack Query + API layer (or tRPC)
Need complex client state?
-
YES → Zustand
-
NO → React Context + useState/useReducer
Need data tables?
-
YES → TanStack Table
-
NO → Plain HTML table or simple list
Need UI components?
-
Start with shadcn/ui (copy-paste)
-
Customize as needed (you own the code)
When to Deviate
Valid Deviations
Static sites:
-
Consider Astro instead of Next.js
-
Better for content-heavy, low-interactivity sites
Non-real-time apps:
-
tRPC + Prisma instead of Convex
-
More control over database schema, migrations
Simple projects:
-
React Context instead of Zustand
-
Reduce dependencies for small apps
Component libraries:
-
Radix UI directly instead of shadcn
-
When you need 100% control from start
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
❌ npm/yarn — Use pnpm for consistency
❌ Redux — Too much boilerplate; use Zustand or TanStack Query
❌ Class components — Use function components + hooks
❌ CSS-in-JS (styled-components, Emotion) — Runtime overhead; use Tailwind
❌ Create React App — Deprecated; use Vite or Next.js
❌ Component libraries as dependencies — Prefer shadcn copy-paste approach
Philosophy
Opinionated defaults, pragmatic deviations.
These tools work well together, have been battle-tested, and provide excellent developer experience. But they're defaults, not dogma.
Choose tools that:
-
Solve real problems (not resume-driven development)
-
Have good documentation and community
-
Integrate well with the rest of the stack
-
Match project requirements (not all projects need real-time)
Prefer boring technology that works over shiny technology that might.
Tool Selection Criteria
Evaluate tools against these requirements (priority order):
- CLI-First (Required)
Tool must be fully operable from command line. Dashboard-only = rejected.
- API-Native (Required)
Programmatic access for automation and scripting.
- MCP-Ready (Strongly Preferred)
Model Context Protocol server for AI agent integration. Check:
-
Official MCP server: @stripe/mcp , @posthog/mcp-server , Sentry MCP
-
Community MCP server: acceptable if maintained
-
No MCP: acceptable only if CLI/API are excellent
Current Stack MCP Status
Service MCP Notes
PostHog ✅ Official @posthog/mcp-server
Sentry ✅ Official @sentry/mcp-server
Stripe ✅ Official @stripe/mcp
Vercel ✅ Official @vercel/mcp
GitHub ✅ Official @modelcontextprotocol/server-github
Clerk ❌ Monitor for MCP support
Convex ❌ CLI is good, no MCP yet